Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund
Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund
framework of ecological function and the environmental obligations of the property, which prevents indigenous peoples, even if they wanted to, from completely changing the forest land use in the overlapping territories. Cases of indigenous territories overlapping with NNP will have to be included under the idea of promoting conservation and forest cover maintenance and will have to form part of the group of incentives to comply with the necessary conditions for the conservation function of these areas. Eventually, resources derived from REDD projects, in these cases, should help ensure existing economic pressures so that the people living in these areas can continue to conserve forest resources as they have done up to now. Finally, the most important legal consequence of the overlap between IRs and NNPs is the impossibility of carrying out an exploration of subsoil resources in the area of NNP, which guarantees that indigenous territories located in these areas are exempt from this type of territorial expropriation, 70 which is becoming a growing threat in the Colombian Amazon. 71 With regard to the overlap between Forest Reserves and Indigenous Reservations, the current law is not as explicit as in the case of overlap with NNPs. However, it declares the possibility for the creation of reservations inside forest reserves, allowing the possibility that they are not exclusive institutions, and for this reason they should harmonize their ecological, as well as their cultural, function. To this respect, law 160 of 1993 in the 6th paragraph of Article 85 points out that “the territories traditionally used by nomadic, semi-nomadic or indigenous people who practice shifting cultivation for hunting, gathering or horticulture which may be located in forest reserve areas according to this law can only be designated as the indigenous reserves, but the occupation and harvesting should also be submitted in addition to the procedures established by the Ministry of the Environment and the current regulations regarding renewable natural resources.” It is possible to interpret that in the case of the overlap of reservations with forest reserves, in addition to the same exceptions of traditional use of the natural resources which are in place in the case of overlap with NNPs, forest reserves are a type of protected areas much 70 Judgment C-649 of 1997. Constitutional Court. 71 The general regime of the NNPS (National Natural Park System) is not applicable to indigenous territories, except in the case of the authorization of exploration and exploitation of subsoil resources belonging to the State or commercial or industrial renewable natural resource permissions. Thus, members of indigenous communities in overlapping areas have been conducting the management, use and harvesting of their natural resources in an uninterrupted and peaceful manner, without the limitations set forth under this rule.” LABORDE, Ramón. “Los Territorios indígenas Traslapados con áreas del Sistema de Parques Naturales.” In: Public Policy Document Nº 23, publication of the National Environmental Forum. December 2007. 46 Av o i d e d d e f o re s t A t i o n (redd) A n d i n d i g e n o u s p e o p l e s: experiences, chAllenges A n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s in t h e A m A zo n c o n t e x t
less restricted than a NNP, making the implementation of non-traditional activities possible in its interior without detracting from the environmental objectives of the area. 72 As a matter of fact, the legislation permits the separation of areas from the reserve in order for non-forestry activities to be implemented. When indigenous people want to carry out non-traditional economic activities in the overlapping territories, they can solicit the regional environmental authority for the separation of a part of the forest reserve inside their territory with the objective of implementing economic uses other than forest uses, while demonstrating that the protective function of the reserve is not being affected. Article 210 of the RNRC states that “If in areas of forest reserves, for reasons of public utility or social interest, it is necessary to implement economic activities that imply removal of forest or land use change or any other activity different from the rational harvesting of forests in areas of forest reserves, the affected zone should be duly demarcated and separated from the reserve. It is also possible to separate from the forest reserve the premises whose owners demonstrate that their soils can be used in operations other than forestry provided that they do not harm the protective function of the reserve.” This means that, in indigenous territories that overlap with forest reserves, indigenous people can legally change the forest use of their land for other types provided that they meet with the constraints of environmental regulation; this implies that, to comply with the ecological function of the property, indigenous people cannot change the forest use of their entire territory, as it is necessary to define an area to be separated from the forest reserve. The proportion of said area should be agreed upon between the Regional Environmental Authority and the indigenous people. In addition, the laws pertaining to Forest Reserves, establish that any infrastructure project to be implemented in such an area should guarantee that it does not conflict with the conservation of renewable natural resources; this constitutes an additional guarantee for the preservation of the natural resources that belong to the indigenous people who live there. 73 72 Article 207 of the Renewable Natural Resources Code (hereafter RNRC) points out that “The forest reserve area can only be used for permanent rational use of forests that exist therein or are established and, in any case, should guarantee the recuperation and survival of the forests.” (Emphasis by author) 73 Article 208 Legislative Decree 2811 of 1974. “Ways, reservoirs, dams or buildings and the implementation of economic activities inside of forest reserve areas, will require prior licensing. The license will only be granted when it has been proven that the execution of the works and the exercise of the activities do not conflict with the conservation of the renewable natural resources of the area.” (Emphasis by author.) Av o i d e d d e f o re s t A t i o n (redd) A n d i n d i g e n o u s p e o p l e s: experiences, chAllenges A n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s in t h e A m A zo n c o n t e x t 47
- Page 1 and 2: Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and In
- Page 3 and 4: Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and In
- Page 5: Summary Introduction Raul Silva Tel
- Page 8 and 9: Amazon region is currently the pref
- Page 11 and 12: Indigenous Lands and the Climate Cr
- Page 13 and 14: “Amazon biome,” which does not
- Page 15 and 16: approximately 13 million hectares,
- Page 17 and 18: The tables below display data regar
- Page 19 and 20: In practice, the main decisions reg
- Page 21: Nogueira, EM., Fearnside, PM., Nels
- Page 24 and 25: 22 Av o i d e d d e f o re s t A t
- Page 26 and 27: Given the absence of legal definiti
- Page 28 and 29: internal debates on this issue, pre
- Page 30 and 31: which they have traditionally owned
- Page 32 and 33: which Bolivian legislation calls
- Page 34 and 35: consultation” in its articles 30.
- Page 36 and 37: are also facilitated by the strong
- Page 38 and 39: legal risk that these lands can be
- Page 40 and 41: has the duty (and exclusive compete
- Page 42 and 43: derived from them, such as from the
- Page 44 and 45: On the other hand, the Colombian le
- Page 46 and 47: “the special norms which regulate
- Page 50 and 51: The law permits and stimulates refo
- Page 52 and 53: the use, enjoyment, control, admini
- Page 54 and 55: One of these bills relates to the e
- Page 56 and 57: the constitution which still has no
- Page 58 and 59: Since there is not a specific law r
- Page 60 and 61: communities of the sierra and jungl
- Page 62 and 63: the lands that they possess and tha
- Page 64 and 65: and legal instruments to guarantee
- Page 66 and 67: those recognized “in internationa
- Page 68 and 69: limitation for implementing eventua
- Page 70 and 71: REDD in Venezuela Since REDD mechan
- Page 72 and 73: to implement REDD projects with bec
- Page 74 and 75: Can IPs dispose of the forestry res
- Page 76 and 77: Ecuador Yes. However, it will be ne
- Page 78 and 79: to reductions in GHG emissions and
- Page 80 and 81: did not establish any mechanism to
- Page 82 and 83: On the other hand, there is a growi
- Page 84 and 85: the co-existence of diverse culture
- Page 86 and 87: In accordance with this internation
- Page 88 and 89: Indigenous Peoples as Protagonists
- Page 90 and 91: e considered a security under Brazi
- Page 92 and 93: cannot dispose of the lands they tr
- Page 94 and 95: Article 34 of the Indian Statute (F
- Page 96 and 97: is a legal obligation and there is
framework of ecological function <strong>and</strong> the environmental obligations of the property, which<br />
prevents indigenous peoples, even if they wanted to, from completely changing the forest l<strong>and</strong><br />
use in the overlapping territories.<br />
Cases of indigenous territories overlapping with NNP will have to be included under the<br />
idea of promoting conservation <strong>and</strong> forest cover maintenance <strong>and</strong> will have to form part of the<br />
group of incentives to comply with the necessary conditions for the conservation function of<br />
these areas. Eventually, resources derived from <strong>REDD</strong> projects, in these cases, should help ensure<br />
existing economic pressures so that the people living in these areas can continue to conserve<br />
forest resources as they have done up to now.<br />
Finally, the most important legal consequence of the overlap between IRs <strong>and</strong> NNPs is<br />
the impossibility of carrying out an exploration of subsoil resources in the area of NNP, which<br />
guarantees that indigenous territories located in these areas are exempt from this type of<br />
territorial expropriation, 70 which is becoming a growing threat in the Colombian <strong>Amazon</strong>. 71<br />
With regard to the overlap between Forest Reserves <strong>and</strong> <strong>Indigenous</strong> Reservations, the<br />
current law is not as explicit as in the case of overlap with NNPs. However, it declares the possibility<br />
for the creation of reservations inside forest reserves, allowing the possibility that they are not<br />
exclusive institutions, <strong>and</strong> for this reason they should harmonize their ecological, as well as their<br />
cultural, function. To this respect, law 160 of 1993 in the 6th paragraph of Article 85 points out that<br />
“the territories traditionally used by nomadic, semi-nomadic or indigenous people who practice<br />
shifting cultivation for hunting, gathering or horticulture which may be located in forest reserve<br />
areas according to this law can only be designated as the indigenous reserves, but the occupation<br />
<strong>and</strong> harvesting should also be submitted in addition to the procedures established by the Ministry<br />
of the Environment <strong>and</strong> the current regulations regarding renewable natural resources.”<br />
It is possible to interpret that in the case of the overlap of reservations with forest<br />
reserves, in addition to the same exceptions of traditional use of the natural resources which<br />
are in place in the case of overlap with NNPs, forest reserves are a type of protected areas much<br />
70 Judgment C-649 of 1997. Constitutional Court.<br />
71 The general regime of the NNPS (National Natural Park System) is not applicable to indigenous territories,<br />
except in the case of the authorization of exploration <strong>and</strong> exploitation of subsoil resources belonging to the State<br />
or commercial or industrial renewable natural resource permissions. Thus, members of indigenous communities<br />
in overlapping areas have been conducting the management, use <strong>and</strong> harvesting of their natural resources in<br />
an uninterrupted <strong>and</strong> peaceful manner, without the limitations set forth under this rule.” LABORDE, Ramón. “Los<br />
Territorios indígenas Traslapados con áreas del Sistema de Parques Naturales.” In: Public Policy Document Nº 23,<br />
publication of the National Environmental Forum. December 2007.<br />
46 Av o i d e d d e f o re s t A t i o n (redd) A n d i n d i g e n o u s p e o p l e s: experiences, chAllenges A n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s in t h e A m A zo n c o n t e x t