Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund
Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund
Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The ownership of CERs <strong>and</strong> VERs generated by the project is clearly a situation where<br />
economic benefits result from the dem<strong>and</strong> for credits created by the Kyoto Regime <strong>and</strong>/or the<br />
voluntary market. Regardless of the definition of the legal nature of CERs <strong>and</strong> VERs, which is<br />
still under debate by Brazilian scholars, both are characterized as a right (in the case of CER, as<br />
established by international law), the economic benefits of which shall be obtained through<br />
project activities.<br />
It is clear that the Surui have the legal title over CERs <strong>and</strong> VERs which may result from<br />
sustainable forest practices conducted by the Surui on their l<strong>and</strong>. Such rights, such as in any other<br />
case, must be exercised in compliance with the rules <strong>and</strong> sustainability criteria established by<br />
the relevant legislation, including the regulations regarding CDM project approval or Voluntary<br />
Market st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> the sustainable management of natural forests as foreseen in the Brazilian<br />
Forest Code.<br />
Federal Public Forest Concession Law<br />
With regards to the possible intersection between Surui Carbon projects in Brazilian<br />
Indians’ l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Federal Law Nº 11, 284/06 on Management of Public Forests, 30 we underst<strong>and</strong><br />
that the public forest concession regime established by the law does not apply to forests that<br />
cover Brazilian Indians’ l<strong>and</strong>, due to the following reasons:<br />
• The Brazilian Indians have exclusive constitutional rights of fruition from their l<strong>and</strong>;<br />
• The concept of concession established by Federal Decree Nº 271, of February 28, 1967<br />
<strong>and</strong> Administrative Law doctrine clearly does not apply to activities conducted on<br />
Brazilian Indians’ l<strong>and</strong>; 31<br />
30 Public forests are classified by the Brazilian Forest Service as “A,” “B,” or “C”. The public forests of category “A” are<br />
located in areas destined to Environmental Protection <strong>and</strong> Conservation Units (Unidades de Conservação de<br />
Proteção Integral e de Uso Sustentável) <strong>and</strong> to the use of traditional communities (e.g., Brazilian Indians),<br />
as well as other forms of destinations established by law. The public forests of category “B” are located in<br />
public areas but were not object of specific destination, <strong>and</strong> public forests of category “C” are located in<br />
areas of indefinite domain. Further information is available at http://www.florestal.gov.br/<br />
31 Besides the definition of concession regarding public forests set forth in Law Nº 11,284/06, the legal<br />
institution of concession was established in Article 7 of Federal Decree Nº 271 on February 28, 1967.<br />
In addition, the Administrative Law legal doctrine defines it as “the agreement by which the Administration<br />
transfers a payable or free use of a public l<strong>and</strong> to a private entity, as a resolute in rem right, for the specific<br />
purposes of urbanization, industrialization, cultivation or any other exploitation with social interests.<br />
See MEIRELLES, Hely Lopes. Direito Administrativo Brasileiro [Brazilian Administrative Law], São Paulo:<br />
Ed. Malheiros, 2001.<br />
134 Av o i d e d d e f o re s t A t i o n (redd) A n d i n d i g e n o u s p e o p l e s: experiences, chAllenges A n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s in t h e A m A zo n c o n t e x t