FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ... FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
DOCUMENT (Title and acronym; R signifies Recipient, P Project) [P] Project Emergency Procedures [P] Public Education Program [P] System Integration Test Plan (SITP) [R] Operations and Maintenance Plan (OMP) [R] Rail [or Bus] Fleet Management Plan (RFMP) [or BFMP] [P] Training Plans and Manuals SSI Preliminary Engineering Final Design FFGA Application Construction Testing and Start-Up Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y NOTES Project document, like other safety and security documents; may have various titles. PMOC must be aware of recipient’s nomenclature to assure that proper materials are reviewed. Program is relevant if safety or security issues are required in outreach efforts. (Examples: grade crossing, noise abatement, trespass issues) Document should be reviewed for consistency with SSMP and to assure it includes needed integration tests and emergency drills, and has adequate test procedures and reporting requirements. New plan for a recipient’s initial rail project or revisions to an existing plan for a subsequent rail project; review for consistency with SSMP, timeliness of safety and security training requirements, and adequacy of personnel to provide required levels of safety and security after the start of revenue operations. New plan for a recipient’s initial rail/bus project or revisions to an existing plan for a subsequent project; review for consistency with SSMP and adequacy of facilities to safely maintain fleet. OP 22 Safety and Security Management Plan Review Revision 0, June 2008 Page B-5
APPENDIX C: LIST OF POSSIBLE INTERVIEWEES As with documents, different recipients and different projects will have staff with different titles. The following list can assist the PMOC in identifying the personnel to be interviewed at a particular project: Chief Executive Senior person responsible for project management Senior persons responsible for rail operations, construction, and facilities engineering Senior safety manager(s), including those responsible for construction and system safety Emergency preparedness manager Senior security or police manager (may be the police chief or may be a civilian) Agency and project managers for rail operations, risk management, construction, facilities engineering, and systems integration Actual titles of interviewees for a past SSMP review included: Senior Vice President, Project Management Assistant Vice President, Technical Services Director, Engineering and Systems Assistant Vice President, Construction System Integration Consultant Safety Manager, Rail Systems Safety Manager, Construction Manager, Rail Operations Emergency Preparedness Chief of Police Assistant Vice President, Risk Management Senior Manager, Safety Assistant Vice President, Facilities Engineering Vice President, Maintenance General Engineering Consultant Systems Design Consultant Light Rail Vehicle Consultant OP 22 Safety and Security Management Plan Review Revision 0, June 2008 Page C-1
- Page 41: APPENDIX A Sample - Lessons Learned
- Page 66 and 67: • Recipients with major capital p
- Page 68 and 69: follow, have different names for si
- Page 70 and 71: documents referenced in the SSMP to
- Page 72 and 73: (2) The effectiveness of the proces
- Page 74 and 75: For recipients with projects affect
- Page 76 and 77: APPENDIX A: SSMP REVIEW CHECKLIST -
- Page 78 and 79: App. No. Checklist Item Plan Requir
- Page 80 and 81: App. No. Checklist Item Plan Requir
- Page 82 and 83: App. No. Checklist Item Plan Requir
- Page 84 and 85: App. No. Checklist Item Plan Requir
- Page 86 and 87: App. No. Checklist Item Plan Requir
- Page 88 and 89: APPENDIX B: LIST OF SUGGESTED DOCUM
- Page 90 and 91: DOCUMENT (Title and acronym; R sign
- Page 94 and 95: APPENDIX D: SAMPLE INTERVIEW QUESTI
- Page 96 and 97: APPENDIX E: SSMP REVIEW CHECKLIST -
- Page 98 and 99: Note: SSMP Element Compliant with D
- Page 100 and 101: SSMP Element Compliant with DRAFT G
- Page 102 and 103: APPENDIX F: DISCUSSION OF CONTENTS
- Page 104 and 105: candidates for the committee so tha
- Page 106 and 107: US DOT Federal Transit Administrati
- Page 108 and 109: the time. During preliminary engine
- Page 110 and 111: • Plans - who prepares, who can m
- Page 112 and 113: U.S. Department of Transportation F
- Page 114 and 115: • Serve as a resource by lending
- Page 116 and 117: c. Peak Vehicle Requirement include
- Page 118 and 119: 3 PMOC review of Grantee’s Operat
- Page 120 and 121: Requirement PMOC Review Comments 5C
- Page 122 and 123: waiver is requested are not produce
- Page 124 and 125: (5) To provide PMOCs with recommend
- Page 126 and 127: 4.1.2 Pre-Award Purchaser’s Requi
- Page 128 and 129: 5.0 PMOC REVIEW OF PROJECT SPONSOR
- Page 130 and 131: • If no, examine contract files,
- Page 132 and 133: 6.3.2 Corrective Action: The Grante
- Page 134 and 135: 8.0 APPENDICES 8.1 Sample Review Ce
- Page 136 and 137: comply? 5.3.1.5 Are the vehicle bod
- Page 138 and 139: US DOT Federal Transit Administrati
- Page 140 and 141: including: the applicability of Fed
DOCUMENT<br />
(Title and acronym; R<br />
signifies Recipient,<br />
P Project)<br />
[P] Project Emergency<br />
<strong>Procedures</strong><br />
[P] Public Education<br />
Program<br />
[P] System Integration<br />
Test Plan (SITP)<br />
[R] Operations and<br />
Maintenance Plan (OMP)<br />
[R] Rail [or Bus] Fleet<br />
Management Plan<br />
(RFMP) [or BFMP]<br />
[P] Training Plans and<br />
Manuals<br />
SSI<br />
Preliminary<br />
Engineering<br />
Final Design<br />
FFGA<br />
Application<br />
Construction<br />
Testing and<br />
Start-Up<br />
Y Y Y<br />
Y Y Y Y<br />
Y Y<br />
Y Y Y<br />
Y Y Y<br />
Y<br />
NOTES<br />
Project document, like other safety and<br />
security documents; may have various<br />
titles. PMOC must be aware of recipient’s<br />
nomenclature to assure that proper<br />
materials are reviewed.<br />
Program is relevant if safety or security<br />
issues are required in outreach efforts.<br />
(Examples: grade crossing, noise<br />
abatement, trespass issues)<br />
Document should be reviewed for<br />
consistency with SSMP and to assure it<br />
includes needed integration tests and<br />
emergency drills, and has adequate test<br />
procedures and reporting requirements.<br />
New plan for a recipient’s initial rail<br />
project or revisions to an existing plan for a<br />
subsequent rail project; review for<br />
consistency with SSMP, timeliness of<br />
safety and security training requirements,<br />
and adequacy of personnel to provide<br />
required levels of safety and security after<br />
the start of revenue operations.<br />
New plan for a recipient’s initial rail/bus<br />
project or revisions to an existing plan for a<br />
subsequent project; review for consistency<br />
with SSMP and adequacy of facilities to<br />
safely maintain fleet.<br />
OP 22 Safety and Security Management Plan Review<br />
Revision 0, June 2008<br />
Page B-5