FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2. Identify all apparent discrepancies and deficiencies.<br />
3. State findings in descending order of importance (most likely, largest consequences, least<br />
likely, moderate/minor consequences) and make recommendations for modifications or<br />
additional work by the Grantee along with a time frame for the performance of the work.<br />
4. For major findings, provide recommendations for the Grantee and/or <strong>FTA</strong> to implement that<br />
will address the issue or correct or mitigate the deficiency.<br />
5. Identify action items, if any, and next steps.<br />
6. Document the assessment, including objectives, approach/methodology, findings, and<br />
recommendations and provide back-up information in appendices or attachments to the main<br />
body of any report.<br />
6.1 NEPA Overview and New Starts Status<br />
The PMOC shall verify that the<br />
• Definition of the project (i.e., scope) contained in the project ROD/FONSI and most recent New<br />
Starts submittal agree with the scope as developed in PE materials, including the approved PMP<br />
and the engineering design plans and specifications.<br />
• Basic quantities, such as number and locations of facilities, peak and total vehicles, etc., identified<br />
in the environmental document and ROD/FONSI are the same as assumed in the current project<br />
definition.<br />
• The current project design satisfies the capacity and operational objectives established in the<br />
approved environmental document.<br />
• Mitigations committed to in the ROD (or project mitigation plans), when involving a physical or<br />
operational feature of the project, are incorporated—or in the process of being incorporated—into<br />
the engineering design, proposed construction program, and/or other implementation plans.<br />
Mitigations could include changes in design, use of different types of material, modified traffic<br />
control, restricted construction activities, etc.<br />
NOTE: Need to confirm that this is consistent with OP No. 44, or alternatively, require the review to be performed<br />
in accordance with OP No. 44 for the completion of PE/Entry to FD phase of the project<br />
• Environmental and related early permits and approvals for project development have been executed<br />
or are in the approval process.<br />
Assuming an OP No. 32 Scope review has been completed, results should be incorporated into this<br />
analysis. Consistency between the project as planned and as reflected in engineering design is<br />
important.<br />
6.2 PE Plans, Master Schedule, Budget (Cost Estimate)<br />
6.2.1 Engineering Design<br />
The PMOC shall examine the Grantee’s PE plans for clarity, accuracy, and level of detail for a project at<br />
approximately the 30 percent design level (completion of schematic design). Types of information that should be<br />
included in the PE plan sets are listed in Table 1 (pages 12 and 13). Note for discussion by Review Committee<br />
Need to keep this and the future Table 2 consistent with <strong>FTA</strong>’s May 16, 2006 “New Starts Policies and<br />
<strong>Procedures</strong>”<br />
OP 46.2 Readiness to Enter Final Design<br />
Revision 0, June 2008<br />
Page 5 of 11