FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ... FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
• Interim Guidance on Design-Build • Quality Assurance and Quality Control Guidelines • Project and Construction Management Guidelines, 2003 Update • Value Engineering Process Overview, January 1998 5.0 PROJECT SPONSOR SUBMITTALS In advance of performing the review, the PMOC should meet with the FTA Regional Office, the Project Sponsor and their consultants, visit the project sites, discuss the purpose of the review, and obtain and study the available project documents: To verify the status of the LPA • MPO adopted Long Range Transportation Plan • Transportation Improvement Program Narrative and drawing material • Written project narrative, project description • Project sponsor’s New Starts submittal • Final Alternatives Analysis Report • Environmental studies, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Environmental Assessment • Design Criteria, Design Standards • Planning diagrams and drawings, materials used in public presentations • Plans, profiles, cross sections, special studies for locations with large uncertainties Cost and schedule information • Capital cost estimating methodology memo • Cost estimate and back up detail in Project Sponsor’s original format • Schedule in hard copy and acceptable electronic format i.e. Primavera, .PRX, etc. • Cost estimate and schedule in FTA’s Standard Cost Category format • Operating and Maintenance Cost Estimates and Assumptions • Transit Agency Operating and Capital Budget Other Documentation • Project Sponsor Organization and Staffing • Project Management Plan • Operating Plan • Rail Fleet Management Plan • Bus Fleet Management Plan • Risk Register and Mitigation Plan • Contracting Plan for Preliminary Engineering • Contingency Management Plan (identifying significant areas of uncertainty in scope, cost, and schedule) • Real Estate Acquisition Management Plan • System Safety and Security Management Plan • Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan • Third Party Agreements and Permits OP 46.1 LPA Review and Readiness to enter PE Revision 0, June 2008 Page 3 of 8
6.0 SCOPE OF WORK The PMOC should form a competent team of subject matter experts with prior experience to fulfill the requirements below: 1) Setting the groundwork So that this review is undertaken at the appropriate time, the FTA Regional Office should confirm that the Project Sponsor’s materials are developed to the level required at entry to PE. The PMOC should coordinate with the Regional Office to make the initial interview, project discussion and site visit with the project sponsor and to obtain from the project sponsor the materials to be reviewed. The PMOC should verify that the Final Alternative Analysis Report (AA) indicates that the project sponsor has considered all reasonable alternatives. In particular, the PMOC should verify that a transit mode was not overlooked leaving the LPA open to later challenge. The PMOC shall verify that the Notice of Intent for the environmental review has been issued. If an environmental document has been produced, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) or Environmental Assessment (EA), the PMOC shall verify that impacted third parties have been notified of the project and provided with an opportunity to review and comment. For each impacted third party, the PMOC shall coordinate with FTA’s Regional Office that the correct representative has been identified and the correct address has been used. The review should verify that the project is adopted into the MPO’s financially constrained Long Range Transportation Plan and the Transportation Improvement Plan and identify which year the LRTP and TIP call for the project to be funded. 2) Project Scope The PMOC should review the project scope in relation to the Draft Environmental Document, Operating Plan, Design Criteria, Schedule and Budget including an evaluation of the mitigation measures as follows: a) Assess the Project Sponsor’s fundamental reasons for the project and for selecting this alternative from the alternatives considered. Confirm that all reasonable modes were considered by the Project Sponsor in its alternatives analysis. Comment on the project assumptions that have led to scope decisions (relationship between the transit project and existing or future residential/commercial development, ridership in the forecast year, operating plan, infrastructure and vehicle capacities, project implementation schedule, and life cycle considerations, etc.) b) Through a site visit, perform an on-the-ground check of physical conditions. Verify project fit with local conditions through study of project planning diagrams, jurisdictional zoning and transit-oriented development maps, and concept design drawings. c) Study and evaluate the project documents (narratives, design criteria, planning diagrams, plans and profile drawings, aerial photos, and environmental studies) for completeness including: (1) Spatial and functional aspects of the project (2) Compliance with applicable statutes, regulations, guidance and policies, including but not limited to, the level boarding provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act. OP 46.1 LPA Review and Readiness to enter PE Revision 0, June 2008 Page 4 of 8
- Page 204 and 205: activity durations. Critical path f
- Page 206 and 207: US DOT Federal Transit Administrati
- Page 208 and 209: orders may direct the PMOC to reeva
- Page 210 and 211: Design‐Build or CM‐GC), the pro
- Page 212 and 213: degree of understanding among the p
- Page 214 and 215: management labor and profit/fee. Su
- Page 216 and 217: US DOT Federal Transit Administrati
- Page 218 and 219: Construction Risk is subdivided int
- Page 220 and 221: Category or sub‐category cost ele
- Page 222 and 223: with the construction contractor. T
- Page 224 and 225: Management Plan; these recommendati
- Page 226 and 227: etween risk reduction and risk acce
- Page 228 and 229: 75% construction 85% 90% constructi
- Page 230 and 231: milestones, the value of expected m
- Page 232 and 233: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 234 and 235: 4.2 Guidance coordination of platfo
- Page 236 and 237: communicate with the vehicle manufa
- Page 238 and 239: APPENDIX A FTA Request for Informat
- Page 240 and 241: APPENDIX B OP 41 ADA Review - Level
- Page 242 and 243: 4.1 Legislative • The Safe, Accou
- Page 244 and 245: 4) Cost estimate in year-of-expendi
- Page 246 and 247: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 248 and 249: • Project Schedule (Master Schedu
- Page 250 and 251: d) Assessed safety and security iss
- Page 252 and 253: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 256 and 257: (3) Appropriateness of the proposed
- Page 258 and 259: 7) Project Schedule The PMOC should
- Page 260 and 261: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 262 and 263: 2) The Grantee’s program for adva
- Page 264 and 265: 2. Identify all apparent discrepanc
- Page 266 and 267: • The PMOC shall assess whether t
- Page 268 and 269: to FD phase of the project, should
- Page 270 and 271: Table 1, continued: Expected Attrib
- Page 272 and 273: • Real Estate Acquisition Managem
- Page 274 and 275: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 276 and 277: performed Quality assurance records
- Page 278 and 279: plan that ensures the necessary qua
- Page 280 and 281: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 282 and 283: 5.3 Systems/Facilities Integration
- Page 284: 6.2 Successful completion and recor
6.0 SCOPE OF WORK<br />
The PMOC should form a competent team of subject matter experts with prior experience to fulfill the<br />
requirements below:<br />
1) Setting the groundwork<br />
So that this review is undertaken at the appropriate time, the <strong>FTA</strong> Regional Office should confirm<br />
that the Project Sponsor’s materials are developed to the level required at entry to PE. The PMOC<br />
should coordinate with the Regional Office to make the initial interview, project discussion and site<br />
visit with the project sponsor and to obtain from the project sponsor the materials to be reviewed.<br />
The PMOC should verify that the Final Alternative Analysis Report (AA) indicates that the project<br />
sponsor has considered all reasonable alternatives. In particular, the PMOC should verify that a<br />
transit mode was not overlooked leaving the LPA open to later challenge.<br />
The PMOC shall verify that the Notice of Intent for the environmental review has been issued. If<br />
an environmental document has been produced, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) or<br />
Environmental Assessment (EA), the PMOC shall verify that impacted third parties have been<br />
notified of the project and provided with an opportunity to review and comment. For each<br />
impacted third party, the PMOC shall coordinate with <strong>FTA</strong>’s Regional Office that the correct<br />
representative has been identified and the correct address has been used.<br />
The review should verify that the project is adopted into the MPO’s financially constrained Long<br />
Range Transportation Plan and the Transportation Improvement Plan and identify which year the<br />
LRTP and TIP call for the project to be funded.<br />
2) Project Scope<br />
The PMOC should review the project scope in relation to the Draft Environmental Document,<br />
Operating Plan, Design Criteria, Schedule and Budget including an evaluation of the mitigation<br />
measures as follows:<br />
a) Assess the Project Sponsor’s fundamental reasons for the project and for selecting this<br />
alternative from the alternatives considered. Confirm that all reasonable modes were<br />
considered by the Project Sponsor in its alternatives analysis. Comment on the project<br />
assumptions that have led to scope decisions (relationship between the transit project and<br />
existing or future residential/commercial development, ridership in the forecast year, operating<br />
plan, infrastructure and vehicle capacities, project implementation schedule, and life cycle<br />
considerations, etc.)<br />
b) Through a site visit, perform an on-the-ground check of physical conditions. Verify project fit<br />
with local conditions through study of project planning diagrams, jurisdictional zoning and<br />
transit-oriented development maps, and concept design drawings.<br />
c) Study and evaluate the project documents (narratives, design criteria, planning diagrams, plans<br />
and profile drawings, aerial photos, and environmental studies) for completeness including:<br />
(1) Spatial and functional aspects of the project<br />
(2) Compliance with applicable statutes, regulations, guidance and policies, including but<br />
not limited to, the level boarding provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act.<br />
OP 46.1 LPA Review and Readiness to enter PE<br />
Revision 0, June 2008<br />
Page 4 of 8