FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ... FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administration TPM-20 Office of Engineering Project Management Oversight Oversight Procedure 46.1 – LPA Review and Readiness to Enter PE Review ______________________________________________________________________________ 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this Oversight Procedure is to describe the review, analysis and recommendation procedures and reporting requirements expected by Federal Transit Administration (FTA) from the Project Management Oversight Contractor (PMOC) as regards the reliability of the project scope, cost, and schedule of the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) and readiness of the project to enter preliminary engineering (PE). 2.0 BACKGROUND When a Grantee requests entry to PE for a proposed project, FTA undertakes a number of reviews. This review by the PMOC provides FTA with critical input – assessment, conclusions, recommendations, and professional opinions substantiated with project information and comparative industry bench marks -- regarding the reliability of the project scope, cost, and schedule of the LPA. This review also includes an analysis of the adequacy of the Grantee’s technical capacity and capability to perform preliminary engineering work to develop the LPA into a project. Also, Grantee submittals are reviewed to verify the Grantee’s compliance with applicable Federal requirements and FTA program requirements. Consistent with 49 USC 5309(e) (6) and 5328(a) (2, 3), FTA approves/disapproves the entry of a proposed project into PE within 30 days of receipt of a formal request from the Grantee provided the following actions have been completed: • The Alternatives Analysis was completed and the LPA was selected in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA); • The LPA has been incorporated by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) into its financially constrained metropolitan transportation plan; • The Grantee demonstrates adequate technical capacity and capability to carry out preliminary engineering for the proposed project; • Other applicable Federal requirements and FTA program requirements are met. FTA's approval is based on the results of its evaluation as described in 49 CFR Sec. 611.9-611.13. At a minimum, a proposed project must receive an overall rating of "Medium'' to be approved for entry to PE. The PMOC’s performance of this review as documented in a written report is critical input to FTA evaluation and decision making. 3.0 OBJECTIVES With intense competition for limited Federal New Starts funding, project admittance into the New Stars pipeline is carefully considered. Project Sponsor submittals must undergo a thorough review to ensure that projects entered into preliminary engineering are meritorious and have a high likelihood of OP 46.1 LPA Review and Readiness to enter PE Revision 0, June 2008 Page 1 of 8
successful completion. This review helps FTA to make these determinations and helps to establish a level playing field for rating these projects. The project at the time of this review is in an early stage of development. In fact in most cases, the project has just emerged as the preferred alternative from an analysis of many mode and alignment alternatives. However, significant information should be available for the PMOC to undertake a qualitative and quantitative review. The PMOC is to synthesize the findings of its review, describe the project, provide FTA with a wellgrounded professional opinion as to the reliability of the scope, cost, and schedule of the LPA, describe uncertainties, and make a statement of the potential cost range (lower/upper bound). For areas of significant uncertainties, the PMOC is to recommend additional investigation, planning or design work by the Project Sponsor and stipulate a time frame for accomplishing the work either prior to or after FTA’s decision regarding project entry into PE. The Project Sponsor’s technical capacity and capability to preliminary engineer the project should be assessed and deficiencies with recommended remedies should be provided. 4.0 REFERENCES The following are the principal, but by no means the only, references to Federal legislation, codification, regulation and guidance with which the PMOC should have a good understanding as related to the Grantee’s project work being reviewed under this OP: 4.1 Legislative • Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987, P.L. 100-17 • The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, or SAFETEA-LU, Pub.L. 109-59 4.2 United States Code • FTA enabling statutes, 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53, Section 5327 4.3 Regulations • Project Management Oversight, 49 C.F.R. Part 633 • Major Capital Investment Projects, 49 C.F.R. Part 611 • Joint FTA/FHWA regulations, Metropolitan Planning, 23 C.F.R. Part 450 • Joint FTA/FHWA regulations, Environmental Impact and Related Procedures, 23 C.F.R. Part 771 • U.S. DOT regulation, Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition for Federal and Federally Assisted Programs, 49 C.F.R. Part 24 4.4 FTA Circulars • C4220.1F, Third Party Contracting Requirements • C5010.1C, Grant Management Guidelines • FTA Master Agreement • C6800.1, Safety and Security Management Plan 4.5 Guidance • Guidance for Transit Financial Plans, June 2000 • Reporting Instructions for the Section 5309 New Starts Criteria OP 46.1 LPA Review and Readiness to enter PE Revision 0, June 2008 Page 2 of 8
- Page 202 and 203: E) Lead times and durations for equ
- Page 204 and 205: activity durations. Critical path f
- Page 206 and 207: US DOT Federal Transit Administrati
- Page 208 and 209: orders may direct the PMOC to reeva
- Page 210 and 211: Design‐Build or CM‐GC), the pro
- Page 212 and 213: degree of understanding among the p
- Page 214 and 215: management labor and profit/fee. Su
- Page 216 and 217: US DOT Federal Transit Administrati
- Page 218 and 219: Construction Risk is subdivided int
- Page 220 and 221: Category or sub‐category cost ele
- Page 222 and 223: with the construction contractor. T
- Page 224 and 225: Management Plan; these recommendati
- Page 226 and 227: etween risk reduction and risk acce
- Page 228 and 229: 75% construction 85% 90% constructi
- Page 230 and 231: milestones, the value of expected m
- Page 232 and 233: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 234 and 235: 4.2 Guidance coordination of platfo
- Page 236 and 237: communicate with the vehicle manufa
- Page 238 and 239: APPENDIX A FTA Request for Informat
- Page 240 and 241: APPENDIX B OP 41 ADA Review - Level
- Page 242 and 243: 4.1 Legislative • The Safe, Accou
- Page 244 and 245: 4) Cost estimate in year-of-expendi
- Page 246 and 247: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 248 and 249: • Project Schedule (Master Schedu
- Page 250 and 251: d) Assessed safety and security iss
- Page 254 and 255: • Interim Guidance on Design-Buil
- Page 256 and 257: (3) Appropriateness of the proposed
- Page 258 and 259: 7) Project Schedule The PMOC should
- Page 260 and 261: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 262 and 263: 2) The Grantee’s program for adva
- Page 264 and 265: 2. Identify all apparent discrepanc
- Page 266 and 267: • The PMOC shall assess whether t
- Page 268 and 269: to FD phase of the project, should
- Page 270 and 271: Table 1, continued: Expected Attrib
- Page 272 and 273: • Real Estate Acquisition Managem
- Page 274 and 275: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 276 and 277: performed Quality assurance records
- Page 278 and 279: plan that ensures the necessary qua
- Page 280 and 281: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 282 and 283: 5.3 Systems/Facilities Integration
- Page 284: 6.2 Successful completion and recor
U.S. DOT <strong>Federal</strong> <strong>Transit</strong> <strong>Administration</strong><br />
TPM-20 Office of Engineering<br />
Project Management <strong>Oversight</strong><br />
<strong>Oversight</strong> Procedure 46.1 – LPA Review and Readiness to Enter PE Review<br />
______________________________________________________________________________<br />
1.0 PURPOSE<br />
The purpose of this <strong>Oversight</strong> Procedure is to describe the review, analysis and recommendation<br />
procedures and reporting requirements expected by <strong>Federal</strong> <strong>Transit</strong> <strong>Administration</strong> (<strong>FTA</strong>) from the<br />
Project Management <strong>Oversight</strong> Contractor (PMOC) as regards the reliability of the project scope, cost,<br />
and schedule of the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) and readiness of the project to enter<br />
preliminary engineering (PE).<br />
2.0 BACKGROUND<br />
When a Grantee requests entry to PE for a proposed project, <strong>FTA</strong> undertakes a number of reviews.<br />
This review by the PMOC provides <strong>FTA</strong> with critical input – assessment, conclusions,<br />
recommendations, and professional opinions substantiated with project information and comparative<br />
industry bench marks -- regarding the reliability of the project scope, cost, and schedule of the LPA.<br />
This review also includes an analysis of the adequacy of the Grantee’s technical capacity and<br />
capability to perform preliminary engineering work to develop the LPA into a project. Also, Grantee<br />
submittals are reviewed to verify the Grantee’s compliance with applicable <strong>Federal</strong> requirements and<br />
<strong>FTA</strong> program requirements.<br />
Consistent with 49 USC 5309(e) (6) and 5328(a) (2, 3), <strong>FTA</strong> approves/disapproves the entry of a<br />
proposed project into PE within 30 days of receipt of a formal request from the Grantee provided the<br />
following actions have been completed:<br />
• The Alternatives Analysis was completed and the LPA was selected in accordance with the<br />
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA);<br />
• The LPA has been incorporated by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) into its<br />
financially constrained metropolitan transportation plan;<br />
• The Grantee demonstrates adequate technical capacity and capability to carry out preliminary<br />
engineering for the proposed project;<br />
• Other applicable <strong>Federal</strong> requirements and <strong>FTA</strong> program requirements are met.<br />
<strong>FTA</strong>'s approval is based on the results of its evaluation as described in 49 CFR Sec. 611.9-611.13. At a<br />
minimum, a proposed project must receive an overall rating of "Medium'' to be approved for entry to<br />
PE. The PMOC’s performance of this review as documented in a written report is critical input to<br />
<strong>FTA</strong> evaluation and decision making.<br />
3.0 OBJECTIVES<br />
With intense competition for limited <strong>Federal</strong> New Starts funding, project admittance into the New<br />
Stars pipeline is carefully considered. Project Sponsor submittals must undergo a thorough review to<br />
ensure that projects entered into preliminary engineering are meritorious and have a high likelihood of<br />
OP 46.1 LPA Review and Readiness to enter PE<br />
Revision 0, June 2008<br />
Page 1 of 8