FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ... FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
with the construction contractor. The effect of such alternative project delivery methods should be considered in consultation with the FTA work order manager. The extent and effectiveness of third party risk transfers and sharing is a component of the OP‐35 product. SCC Category Cost Range Establishment SCC Cost Elements within an SCC Category are assumed to be positively correlated and therefore the total SCC Category Cost Range for a given SCC category is the sum of the ranges of the individual SCC Category Elements. These calculations are modeled in the FTA Cost Risk Assessment Worksheet. 6.2.2.3 Project Cost Risk Assessment Project risk is an aggregated amount of the risk associated with all of the SCC Category Cost Ranges. It is assumed to be normally distributed and partially correlated at 33% of the difference between the fully correlated and fully independent cases. Example worksheets with the appropriate calculations are available from the WOM. As directed by the COTR/WOM, the Project level risk model shall be successively modeled and iteratively advanced at each future Project Milestone. The PMOC shall also produce a separate chart that lists the SCC/BCEs with their assessment data ranked by their variability in terms of the standard deviations and percentage effect on the overall budget. The PMOC will then perform additional assessments and present, in a narrative format, its analysis on those project elements with the largest variability in cost in order to identify the cost, schedule and technical risk drivers. The work order manager or COTR may direct the PMOC to perform additional analysis of covariance/correlation in the form of logic diagrams, matrices, etc. In addition, development of a second risk transfer curve that represents the PMOC’s estimate of risk transferred to third party project participants, using information developed in the OP‐35 may be required, as directed by the work order manager. 6.3 Project Schedule Risk The PMOC shall use its professional judgment to identify, assess, and evaluate the uncertainties in the Grantee’s project schedule, in terms of the project’s social, political, legal, financial and physical environment. Such evaluation shall be based on the PMOC’s review of the Grantee’s structure, and the project’s scope, schedule, cost estimates, and delivery process, including prior reviews conducted under other Operational Procedures. Further, the PMOC will document and report its recommendations for responding to identified items of likely risk, including recommendations of adjustment to the Grantee’s schedule and Project Management Plan. 6.3.1 Schedule Risk Event Identification The PMOC shall identify and document the uncertainties in the project schedule using information provided by the Grantee. Such assessment shall generally be conducted in a manner similar to that outlined for Cost Risk Identification (see 6.2.1, above). Special attention should be focused on the interrelationship between identified Cost Risk Events and Schedule Risk Events. OP 40 Risk Assessment and Mitigation Review Revision 0, June 2008 Page 7 of 16
Risk Events identified shall be reported in a format similar to the prior‐established Cost Risk Register, using similar numbering and categorization schemas. Where appropriate, this listing will contain cross‐references to the Cost Risk Register. 6.3.2 Schedule Risk Assessment The PMOC shall assess the likelihood of project completion within the timeframes estimated on Grantee’s schedule. This assessment shall include: evaluation of activity durations, including statistical information such as range, mean, minimum and maximums, and whether such durations are appropriate for the project phase; identification of critical and near‐critical paths and the relationship between those paths and identified risk events; identification of hidden and exposed time contingencies and their role in schedule risk mitigation; and identification of logic relationships designed to provide risk mitigation. The FTA may direct other similar analyses. Based upon its findings, the PMOC shall assess the sufficiency of the Grantee’s sequencing and schedule to cause project completion within targeted completion dates, including any interim milestones. Based upon the assessment, the Contractor shall provide recommendations for adjustment to the Grantee’s schedule and Project Management Plan to reduce risk of not meeting the project’s schedule goals. 6.4 Performance and Safety Risk Subject to the issuance of individual Work Orders, the PMOC shall identify, assess and evaluate the uncertainties in the Grantee’s project that are not directly related to project cost or schedule such as technical performance of systems, vehicles, etc. in terms of system reliability (mean time between failure, etc.) or safety in terms of reportable accidents, etc. The PMOC shall develop its approach for risk assessments of this Section and shall review the approach and receive WOM approval prior to executing this work. In general, such risk assessments shall conform to the principles outlined for cost and schedule assessments, detailed within this Oversight Procedure; however, these risk products shall be tailored to the specific requirements of the project, considering stage of project development and project scope. Upon completion of these risk assessments, the PMOC shall provide recommendations for adjustment to the Grantee’s Project Management Plan. 6.5 Contract Packaging Risk As part of an individual work order, the FTA may direct the PMOC to develop specialized risk management products for cost and/or schedule, on a non‐recurring basis. Examples of such products are PMO reviews of Grantee project deliverables produced in conformance with approved project management plans or sub plans. Using data inputs regarding contingency and scope, the PMOC shall analyze the Grantee’s proposed contract language for its effectiveness in meeting the proposed allocation of risk developed as part of the Grantee’s Project Delivery Method. 6.6 Risk Mitigation 6.6.1 Risk Mitigation Recommendations The PMOC shall develop risk mitigation recommendations for changes to the Grantee’s Project OP 40 Risk Assessment and Mitigation Review Revision 0, June 2008 Page 8 of 16
- Page 172 and 173: 6.2 Preliminary Document Review Upo
- Page 174 and 175: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 176 and 177: o Level 4: Subdivide Level 3 as fol
- Page 178 and 179: • Is integrated with and makes ad
- Page 180 and 181: APPENDIX B Cost Estimate Review Che
- Page 182 and 183: o Confirm that cost estimates are b
- Page 184 and 185: 12) Appendices a) Grantee Project I
- Page 186 and 187: This sample of 118 cost items was s
- Page 188 and 189: consistently accurate. In addition,
- Page 190 and 191: SCC-10.02 Earth Excavation Although
- Page 192 and 193: The scope review identifies risk in
- Page 194 and 195: • Producer Price Index (PPI) - Th
- Page 196 and 197: APPENDICES PROJECT COST ESTIMATE ([
- Page 198 and 199: EXHIBIT D-1: PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
- Page 200 and 201: 3.0 OBJECTIVES FTA’s objective is
- Page 202 and 203: E) Lead times and durations for equ
- Page 204 and 205: activity durations. Critical path f
- Page 206 and 207: US DOT Federal Transit Administrati
- Page 208 and 209: orders may direct the PMOC to reeva
- Page 210 and 211: Design‐Build or CM‐GC), the pro
- Page 212 and 213: degree of understanding among the p
- Page 214 and 215: management labor and profit/fee. Su
- Page 216 and 217: US DOT Federal Transit Administrati
- Page 218 and 219: Construction Risk is subdivided int
- Page 220 and 221: Category or sub‐category cost ele
- Page 224 and 225: Management Plan; these recommendati
- Page 226 and 227: etween risk reduction and risk acce
- Page 228 and 229: 75% construction 85% 90% constructi
- Page 230 and 231: milestones, the value of expected m
- Page 232 and 233: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 234 and 235: 4.2 Guidance coordination of platfo
- Page 236 and 237: communicate with the vehicle manufa
- Page 238 and 239: APPENDIX A FTA Request for Informat
- Page 240 and 241: APPENDIX B OP 41 ADA Review - Level
- Page 242 and 243: 4.1 Legislative • The Safe, Accou
- Page 244 and 245: 4) Cost estimate in year-of-expendi
- Page 246 and 247: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 248 and 249: • Project Schedule (Master Schedu
- Page 250 and 251: d) Assessed safety and security iss
- Page 252 and 253: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 254 and 255: • Interim Guidance on Design-Buil
- Page 256 and 257: (3) Appropriateness of the proposed
- Page 258 and 259: 7) Project Schedule The PMOC should
- Page 260 and 261: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 262 and 263: 2) The Grantee’s program for adva
- Page 264 and 265: 2. Identify all apparent discrepanc
- Page 266 and 267: • The PMOC shall assess whether t
- Page 268 and 269: to FD phase of the project, should
- Page 270 and 271: Table 1, continued: Expected Attrib
with the construction contractor. The effect of such alternative project delivery methods should be<br />
considered in consultation with the <strong>FTA</strong> work order manager.<br />
The extent and effectiveness of third party risk transfers and sharing is a component of the OP‐35<br />
product.<br />
SCC Category Cost Range Establishment SCC Cost Elements within an SCC Category are assumed<br />
to be positively correlated and therefore the total SCC Category Cost Range for a given SCC category<br />
is the sum of the ranges of the individual SCC Category Elements. These calculations are modeled<br />
in the <strong>FTA</strong> Cost Risk Assessment Worksheet.<br />
6.2.2.3 Project Cost Risk Assessment<br />
Project risk is an aggregated amount of the risk associated with all of the SCC Category Cost Ranges.<br />
It is assumed to be normally distributed and partially correlated at 33% of the difference between<br />
the fully correlated and fully independent cases. Example worksheets with the appropriate<br />
calculations are available from the WOM.<br />
As directed by the COTR/WOM, the Project level risk model shall be successively modeled and<br />
iteratively advanced at each future Project Milestone.<br />
The PMOC shall also produce a separate chart that lists the SCC/BCEs with their assessment data<br />
ranked by their variability in terms of the standard deviations and percentage effect on the overall<br />
budget. The PMOC will then perform additional assessments and present, in a narrative format, its<br />
analysis on those project elements with the largest variability in cost in order to identify the cost,<br />
schedule and technical risk drivers.<br />
The work order manager or COTR may direct the PMOC to perform additional analysis of<br />
covariance/correlation in the form of logic diagrams, matrices, etc. In addition, development of a<br />
second risk transfer curve that represents the PMOC’s estimate of risk transferred to third party<br />
project participants, using information developed in the OP‐35 may be required, as directed by the<br />
work order manager.<br />
6.3 Project Schedule Risk<br />
The PMOC shall use its professional judgment to identify, assess, and evaluate the uncertainties in<br />
the Grantee’s project schedule, in terms of the project’s social, political, legal, financial and physical<br />
environment. Such evaluation shall be based on the PMOC’s review of the Grantee’s structure, and<br />
the project’s scope, schedule, cost estimates, and delivery process, including prior reviews<br />
conducted under other Operational <strong>Procedures</strong>. Further, the PMOC will document and report its<br />
recommendations for responding to identified items of likely risk, including recommendations of<br />
adjustment to the Grantee’s schedule and Project Management Plan.<br />
6.3.1 Schedule Risk Event Identification<br />
The PMOC shall identify and document the uncertainties in the project schedule using information<br />
provided by the Grantee. Such assessment shall generally be conducted in a manner similar to that<br />
outlined for Cost Risk Identification (see 6.2.1, above). Special attention should be focused on the<br />
interrelationship between identified Cost Risk Events and Schedule Risk Events.<br />
OP 40 Risk Assessment and Mitigation Review<br />
Revision 0, June 2008<br />
Page 7 of 16