FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ... FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
US DOT Federal Transit Administration TPM-20 Office of Engineering Project Management Oversight Oversight Procedure 40 – Risk Assessment and Mitigation Review _____________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0 PURPOSE This Oversight Procedure supports FTA programmatic decisions made under uncertainty in a project delivery environment where transit projects are complex and inherently risky. To obtain FTA Project Management Oversight Contractor (PMOC) produced products that reflect a disciplined process, structured deliverables, individual competency, team functionality and rigor of practice; based upon comprehensive systems analysis with analytical support; repeated periodically as the project advances and new data or information becomes available. 2.0 BACKGROUND The role of the OP‐40 product is to establish a programmatic management baseline for evaluating the reliability of the grantee project cost estimate and schedule and attendant components, given the various elements of uncertainty associated with the effectiveness and efficiency of the grantee’s project implementation, the project scope, and the surrounding project conditions. 3.0 OBJECTIVES These products and services support FTA in making programmatic decisions under uncertainty, for projects using traditional or alternative project delivery methods. 4.0 REFERENCES The statutes, regulations, policies, guidance documents and circulars in OP 01 Administrative Conditions and Requirements apply. 5.0 PROJECT SPONSOR SUBMITTALS The PMOC shall obtain appropriate documentation to adequately investigate the project and complete the work described herein; such documentation may include the project cost estimate, FFGA Baseline Cost Estimate (BCE) line items, project schedules, management plans, and other documentation as required. 6.0 SCOPE OF WORK 6.1 PMOC Oversight Plan The PMOC shall develop, submit or resubmit for review, comment and approval a plan for providing surveillance of the Grantee’s performance in risk management, that defines how such services or products will be accomplished in a manner and quality that meets FTA’s requirements. This OP 40 Risk Assessment and Mitigation Review Revision 0, June 2008 Page 1 of 16
surveillance plan should present an overview of the issues, technical approach, and PMOC’s recommendations or course of action and shall identify sampling approaches and inspection methods as well as timelines for reporting deficiencies in Grantee performance, taking corrective actions and varying the level of surveillance depending on the Grantee’s conformance to the performance standards. The purpose of the PMOC’s surveillance plan is to provide the government with an effective tool to manage PMOC performance and to ensure that the Grantee project implementation achieves risk management objectives and targets. 6.2 Cost Risk The PMOC shall use its professional judgment to identify, assess and evaluate the uncertainties in the Grantee’s cost estimates, in terms of the project’s social, political, legal, financial and physical environment. Such evaluation shall be based on the PMOC’s review of the Grantee’s structure, and the project’s scope, schedule, cost estimates, and delivery process, including prior reviews conducted under other Operational Procedures. Further, the PMOC will document and report its recommendations for responding to identified items of likely risk, including recommendations of adjustment to the Grantee’s Project Management Plan. The process of evaluation of cost risk generally includes at a minimum, identification of potential risk events (6.2.1), and may include, as directed by the FTA work order manager, such additional items as cost and/or schedule risk assessment modeling, risk management oversight, or other specialized services as described below or as required to respond to specific project conditions. 6.2.1 Cost Risk Event Identification 6.2.1.1 Risk Events Risk events are individually identified contingent, or unplanned, events that may occur and which may create a plan variance and may be cause for special management scrutiny or action. Such events, or a combination of such events, do not represent all risk present on a project, and the identification or disposal of risk events may only become possible as the project proceeds through its various phases. Therefore, risk event identification may require periodic updates as a project progresses. 6.2.1.2 Risk Categories Risk shall be characterized as belonging to any of the following categories, which are listed in chronological order. Generally, risk is categorized as associated with the category during which the risk may be earliest and best mitigated; these categories are listed below. Requirements Risk is associated with all project development activities from earliest concept through Alternatives Analysis. Design Risk is associated with all design‐related activities occurring after Alternatives Analysis. Substantially complete design risk is indicated when no material design‐related non‐conformances are detected through OP‐32 reviews; OP‐33 reviews indicate that 95% of all construction direct costs are shown on both design deliverables and cost estimate; and OP‐34 reviews indicate that no project level critical path element or procurement activity exceeds 45 calendar days in duration. Market Risk is related to procurement of construction services, materials, and equipment. OP 40 Risk Assessment and Mitigation Review Revision 0, June 2008 Page 2 of 16
- Page 166 and 167: to then be backfilled or would othe
- Page 168 and 169: • Major or critical work details;
- Page 170 and 171: It is important to select a project
- Page 172 and 173: 6.2 Preliminary Document Review Upo
- Page 174 and 175: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 176 and 177: o Level 4: Subdivide Level 3 as fol
- Page 178 and 179: • Is integrated with and makes ad
- Page 180 and 181: APPENDIX B Cost Estimate Review Che
- Page 182 and 183: o Confirm that cost estimates are b
- Page 184 and 185: 12) Appendices a) Grantee Project I
- Page 186 and 187: This sample of 118 cost items was s
- Page 188 and 189: consistently accurate. In addition,
- Page 190 and 191: SCC-10.02 Earth Excavation Although
- Page 192 and 193: The scope review identifies risk in
- Page 194 and 195: • Producer Price Index (PPI) - Th
- Page 196 and 197: APPENDICES PROJECT COST ESTIMATE ([
- Page 198 and 199: EXHIBIT D-1: PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
- Page 200 and 201: 3.0 OBJECTIVES FTA’s objective is
- Page 202 and 203: E) Lead times and durations for equ
- Page 204 and 205: activity durations. Critical path f
- Page 206 and 207: US DOT Federal Transit Administrati
- Page 208 and 209: orders may direct the PMOC to reeva
- Page 210 and 211: Design‐Build or CM‐GC), the pro
- Page 212 and 213: degree of understanding among the p
- Page 214 and 215: management labor and profit/fee. Su
- Page 218 and 219: Construction Risk is subdivided int
- Page 220 and 221: Category or sub‐category cost ele
- Page 222 and 223: with the construction contractor. T
- Page 224 and 225: Management Plan; these recommendati
- Page 226 and 227: etween risk reduction and risk acce
- Page 228 and 229: 75% construction 85% 90% constructi
- Page 230 and 231: milestones, the value of expected m
- Page 232 and 233: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 234 and 235: 4.2 Guidance coordination of platfo
- Page 236 and 237: communicate with the vehicle manufa
- Page 238 and 239: APPENDIX A FTA Request for Informat
- Page 240 and 241: APPENDIX B OP 41 ADA Review - Level
- Page 242 and 243: 4.1 Legislative • The Safe, Accou
- Page 244 and 245: 4) Cost estimate in year-of-expendi
- Page 246 and 247: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 248 and 249: • Project Schedule (Master Schedu
- Page 250 and 251: d) Assessed safety and security iss
- Page 252 and 253: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 254 and 255: • Interim Guidance on Design-Buil
- Page 256 and 257: (3) Appropriateness of the proposed
- Page 258 and 259: 7) Project Schedule The PMOC should
- Page 260 and 261: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 262 and 263: 2) The Grantee’s program for adva
- Page 264 and 265: 2. Identify all apparent discrepanc
surveillance plan should present an overview of the issues, technical approach, and PMOC’s<br />
recommendations or course of action and shall identify sampling approaches and inspection<br />
methods as well as timelines for reporting deficiencies in Grantee performance, taking corrective<br />
actions and varying the level of surveillance depending on the Grantee’s conformance to the<br />
performance standards. The purpose of the PMOC’s surveillance plan is to provide the government<br />
with an effective tool to manage PMOC performance and to ensure that the Grantee project<br />
implementation achieves risk management objectives and targets.<br />
6.2 Cost Risk<br />
The PMOC shall use its professional judgment to identify, assess and evaluate the uncertainties in<br />
the Grantee’s cost estimates, in terms of the project’s social, political, legal, financial and physical<br />
environment. Such evaluation shall be based on the PMOC’s review of the Grantee’s structure, and<br />
the project’s scope, schedule, cost estimates, and delivery process, including prior reviews<br />
conducted under other Operational <strong>Procedures</strong>. Further, the PMOC will document and report its<br />
recommendations for responding to identified items of likely risk, including recommendations of<br />
adjustment to the Grantee’s Project Management Plan.<br />
The process of evaluation of cost risk generally includes at a minimum, identification of potential<br />
risk events (6.2.1), and may include, as directed by the <strong>FTA</strong> work order manager, such additional<br />
items as cost and/or schedule risk assessment modeling, risk management oversight, or other<br />
specialized services as described below or as required to respond to specific project conditions.<br />
6.2.1 Cost Risk Event Identification<br />
6.2.1.1 Risk Events<br />
Risk events are individually identified contingent, or unplanned, events that may occur and which<br />
may create a plan variance and may be cause for special management scrutiny or action. Such<br />
events, or a combination of such events, do not represent all risk present on a project, and the<br />
identification or disposal of risk events may only become possible as the project proceeds through<br />
its various phases. Therefore, risk event identification may require periodic updates as a project<br />
progresses.<br />
6.2.1.2 Risk Categories<br />
Risk shall be characterized as belonging to any of the following categories, which are listed in<br />
chronological order. Generally, risk is categorized as associated with the category during which the<br />
risk may be earliest and best mitigated; these categories are listed below.<br />
Requirements Risk is associated with all project development activities from earliest concept<br />
through Alternatives Analysis.<br />
Design Risk is associated with all design‐related activities occurring after Alternatives Analysis.<br />
Substantially complete design risk is indicated when no material design‐related non‐conformances<br />
are detected through OP‐32 reviews; OP‐33 reviews indicate that 95% of all construction direct<br />
costs are shown on both design deliverables and cost estimate; and OP‐34 reviews indicate that no<br />
project level critical path element or procurement activity exceeds 45 calendar days in duration.<br />
Market Risk is related to procurement of construction services, materials, and equipment.<br />
OP 40 Risk Assessment and Mitigation Review<br />
Revision 0, June 2008<br />
Page 2 of 16