FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ... FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
management labor and profit/fee. Such characterizations shall be adequately supported with analysis and rationales. The second subsection shall assess, evaluate and estimate the effective mitigation capacity of the subject contract package pricing/compensation components. Data shall be presented in a tabular format as applicable. Review and Analysis of Transferred Project Risk Mapping The section shall identify and characterize the project risk set that is identified as being allocated to the third party contract using Grantee or PMOC developed risk sets such as OP-40 models. Such characterizations shall be adequately supported with analysis and rationales. The objective is to present FTA with an estimate of the aggregate amount of eligible risk that is being transferred in terms of its expected value as well as what amount of residual risk is still being retained by the Grantee. Data shall be presented in a tabular format as applicable. Review and Analysis of Transfer Rate This first subsection shall present those transferred risks that the PMOC found occurred in the range of 25-75%. The PMOC shall estimate the aggregate amount of Grantee risk for this class relative to the cost of the contracted mitigation capacity. The second subsection shall present those transferred risks that the PMOC found occurred in the range of less than 25%. The PMOC shall estimate the aggregate amount of Grantee risk for this class relative to the cost of the contracted mitigation capacity. The third subsection shall present those transferred risks that the PMOC found occurred in the range of more than 75% with special attention to those risks transferred at greater than 100%. The PMOC shall estimate the aggregate amount of Grantee risk for this class relative to the cost of the contracted mitigation capacity. Again, with special attention to those risks transferred above 100%. Data shall be presented in a tabular format as applicable. Review and Analysis of Value to Project This section shall identify and characterize the PMOC’s opinion as to the value of the project risk set that is identified as being allocated to third party contracts. Such characterizations shall be adequately supported with analysis and rationales. The objective is to present FTA with an estimate of the aggregate transfer rate and its effectiveness as well as what amount of residual risk is being retained by the Grantee. The PMOC shall also make recommendations as to the way in which this value can be increased or its associated cost can be decreased. Data shall be presented in a tabular format as applicable. Conclusion OP 35 Project Contingency and Contract Package Review Revision 0, June 2008 Page 9 of 10
Recommendations • Scope Review checklists for design and construction reviews. • Recommendations for Conditional Approval to Enter PE/FD • Recommendations for Project Development Agreement/FFGA. Appendix A: Grantee Project Data This section shall identify and characterize the Grantee’s structure and quality of the Grantee’s project data reviewed for the spot report or other deliverables. The intent is to determine the extent, nature, detail and quality of the Grantee project data and the steps the PMOC took to determine its value. The PMOC shall identify, and discuss that Grantee or third party data it accepted without adjustment. Appendix B: Methodology This purpose of this section is to describe the PMOC’s methodology. Include other appendices as necessary or directed. OP 35 Project Contingency and Contract Package Review Revision 0, June 2008 Page 10 of 10
- Page 164 and 165: o Development of strategies for min
- Page 166 and 167: to then be backfilled or would othe
- Page 168 and 169: • Major or critical work details;
- Page 170 and 171: It is important to select a project
- Page 172 and 173: 6.2 Preliminary Document Review Upo
- Page 174 and 175: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 176 and 177: o Level 4: Subdivide Level 3 as fol
- Page 178 and 179: • Is integrated with and makes ad
- Page 180 and 181: APPENDIX B Cost Estimate Review Che
- Page 182 and 183: o Confirm that cost estimates are b
- Page 184 and 185: 12) Appendices a) Grantee Project I
- Page 186 and 187: This sample of 118 cost items was s
- Page 188 and 189: consistently accurate. In addition,
- Page 190 and 191: SCC-10.02 Earth Excavation Although
- Page 192 and 193: The scope review identifies risk in
- Page 194 and 195: • Producer Price Index (PPI) - Th
- Page 196 and 197: APPENDICES PROJECT COST ESTIMATE ([
- Page 198 and 199: EXHIBIT D-1: PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
- Page 200 and 201: 3.0 OBJECTIVES FTA’s objective is
- Page 202 and 203: E) Lead times and durations for equ
- Page 204 and 205: activity durations. Critical path f
- Page 206 and 207: US DOT Federal Transit Administrati
- Page 208 and 209: orders may direct the PMOC to reeva
- Page 210 and 211: Design‐Build or CM‐GC), the pro
- Page 212 and 213: degree of understanding among the p
- Page 216 and 217: US DOT Federal Transit Administrati
- Page 218 and 219: Construction Risk is subdivided int
- Page 220 and 221: Category or sub‐category cost ele
- Page 222 and 223: with the construction contractor. T
- Page 224 and 225: Management Plan; these recommendati
- Page 226 and 227: etween risk reduction and risk acce
- Page 228 and 229: 75% construction 85% 90% constructi
- Page 230 and 231: milestones, the value of expected m
- Page 232 and 233: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 234 and 235: 4.2 Guidance coordination of platfo
- Page 236 and 237: communicate with the vehicle manufa
- Page 238 and 239: APPENDIX A FTA Request for Informat
- Page 240 and 241: APPENDIX B OP 41 ADA Review - Level
- Page 242 and 243: 4.1 Legislative • The Safe, Accou
- Page 244 and 245: 4) Cost estimate in year-of-expendi
- Page 246 and 247: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 248 and 249: • Project Schedule (Master Schedu
- Page 250 and 251: d) Assessed safety and security iss
- Page 252 and 253: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 254 and 255: • Interim Guidance on Design-Buil
- Page 256 and 257: (3) Appropriateness of the proposed
- Page 258 and 259: 7) Project Schedule The PMOC should
- Page 260 and 261: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 262 and 263: 2) The Grantee’s program for adva
Recommendations<br />
• Scope Review checklists for design and construction reviews.<br />
• Recommendations for Conditional Approval to Enter PE/FD<br />
• Recommendations for Project Development Agreement/FFGA.<br />
Appendix A: Grantee Project Data<br />
This section shall identify and characterize the Grantee’s structure and quality of the Grantee’s project<br />
data reviewed for the spot report or other deliverables. The intent is to determine the extent, nature, detail<br />
and quality of the Grantee project data and the steps the PMOC took to determine its value. The PMOC<br />
shall identify, and discuss that Grantee or third party data it accepted without adjustment.<br />
Appendix B: Methodology<br />
This purpose of this section is to describe the PMOC’s methodology.<br />
Include other appendices as necessary or directed.<br />
OP 35 Project Contingency and Contract Package Review<br />
Revision 0, June 2008<br />
Page 10 of 10
Change language