APPENDICES PROJECT COST ESTIMATE ([date of estimate]) Exhibit D-1 summarizes the [Grantee’s] Project cost estimate, dated June 2, 2006, by <strong>FTA</strong> Standard Cost Categories. As of the writing of this report, a more recent cost estimate has been provided by [Grantee], dated June 6, 2006, which decreased the Preliminary Engineering budget (SCC-80) by [$XX] million. This consequently decreased the contingencies (SCC-90) and escalation (SCC-100) costs. However, the PMOC cost review was performed on the June 2, 2006 Grantee cost estimate and its backup documentation. OP 33 Capital Cost Estimate Review Revision 0, June 2008 Page D-12
EXHIBIT D-1: PROJECT COST ESTIMATE CLASSIFICATION DRAFT Quant Lump Sum / Perce Perce Estimate Classification ity UM n Unit Pricing n CER n Allowance Σn Total nt n nt $ Percent Of Total 10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK 88.7% 43.0% 1.4% 22.4% 10.0% 34.6% ELEMENTS (route miles) 9.40 RM 258 $ 73,570,533 4 $ 38,348,813 29 $ 59,196,427 291 $171,115,773 Drawings / Specifications 257 $ 63,214,438 3 $ 32,950,675 260 $ 96,165,113 89.3% 56.2% Schedule (Includes Escalation) 1 $ 10,356,094 1 $ 5,398,138 1 $ 8,332,735 3 $ 24,086,968 1.0% 14.1% Design Report $ - $ - 28 $ 50,863,692 28 $ 50,863,692 9.6% 29.7% GCs $ - $ - - $ - 0.0% 0.0% Percent Of Total 20 STATIONS, STOPS, 54.3% 28.1% 11.4% 18.0% 34.3% 53.8% TERMINALS, INTERMODAL 11.00 EA 19 $ 7,299,565 4 $ 4,683,534 12 $ 13,967,320 35 $ 25,950,418 Drawings / Specifications 18 $ 6,272,000 3 $ 4,024,229 21 $ 10,296,229 60.0% 39.7% Schedule (Includes Escalation) 1 $ 1,027,565 1 $ 659,304.4 1 $ 1,966,190 3 $ 3,653,059 8.6% 14.1% Design Report $ - $ - 11 $ 12,001,130 11 $ 12,001,130 31.4% 46.2% GCs $ - $ - - $ - 0.0% 0.0% Percent Of Total 30 SUPPORT FACILITIES: YARDS, 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% SHOPS, ADMIN. BLDGS 9.40 RM - $ - - $ - - $ - - $ - Drawings / Specifications $ - - $ - Schedule (Includes Escalation) $ - $ - $ - - $ - Design Report $ - $ - $ - - $ - GCs $ - $ - - $ - Percent Of Total 48.3% 42.1% 32.8% 47.9% 18.9% 10.0% 40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 9.40 RM 115 $ 34,909,305 78 $ 39,674,285 45 $ 8,243,518 238 $ 82,827,108 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Drawings / Specifications 114 $ 29,995,357 77 $ 34,089,602 44 $ 7,083,134 235 $ 71,168,093 98.7% 85.9% Schedule (Includes Escalation) 1 $ 4,913,948 1 $ 5,584,682 1 $ 1,160,385 3 $ 11,659,015 1.3% 14.1% Design Report $ - - $ - 0.0% 0.0% GCs $ - - $ - 0.0% 0.0% Percent Of Total 9.8% 9.8% 7.8% 23.2% 82.4% 67.0% 50 SYSTEMS 9.40 RM 5 $ 2,459,937 4 $ 5,847,541 42 $ 16,888,973 51 $ 25,196,451 Drawings / Specifications 4 $ 2,113,650 - $ - - $ - 4 $ 2,113,650 7.8% 8.4% Schedule (Includes Escalation) 1 $ 346,287 1 $ 823,163 1 $ 2,377,473 3 $ 3,546,923 5.9% 14.1% Design Report $ - 3 $ 5,024,379 41 $ 14,511,500 44 $ 19,535,879 86.3% 77.5% GCs $ - $ - $ - - $ - 0.0% 0.0% OP 33 Capital Cost Estimate Review Revision 0, June 2008 Page D-13
- Page 1 and 2:
CLIN# OP# FTA Oversight Procedures
- Page 3 and 4:
5.0 GRANTEE SUBMITTALS NA 6.0 SCOPE
- Page 5 and 6:
6.1.2 Task Orders FTA headquarters
- Page 7 and 8:
and communications systems; fare co
- Page 9 and 10:
7.1 Format Avoid repetition in the
- Page 11 and 12:
APPENDIX B Sample Task Order ______
- Page 13 and 14:
APPENDIX D Sample Proposal Format _
- Page 15 and 16:
U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 17 and 18:
Management controls are the organiz
- Page 19 and 20:
5. Act in a manner consistent with
- Page 21 and 22:
5) Introduction to PMOC scope of wo
- Page 23 and 24:
7.3 Project Status Reporting - Cont
- Page 25 and 26:
Cost $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,0
- Page 27 and 28:
• Legislators, legislative staff
- Page 29 and 30:
4.2 FTA Circulars • C5010.1C, Gra
- Page 31 and 32:
v) develop and implement a force ac
- Page 33 and 34:
4.0 REFERENCES The following are th
- Page 35 and 36:
o PMOC’s opinion of situations an
- Page 37 and 38:
The report formatting requirements
- Page 39 and 40:
U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 41:
APPENDIX A Sample - Lessons Learned
- Page 66 and 67:
• Recipients with major capital p
- Page 68 and 69:
follow, have different names for si
- Page 70 and 71:
documents referenced in the SSMP to
- Page 72 and 73:
(2) The effectiveness of the proces
- Page 74 and 75:
For recipients with projects affect
- Page 76 and 77:
APPENDIX A: SSMP REVIEW CHECKLIST -
- Page 78 and 79:
App. No. Checklist Item Plan Requir
- Page 80 and 81:
App. No. Checklist Item Plan Requir
- Page 82 and 83:
App. No. Checklist Item Plan Requir
- Page 84 and 85:
App. No. Checklist Item Plan Requir
- Page 86 and 87:
App. No. Checklist Item Plan Requir
- Page 88 and 89:
APPENDIX B: LIST OF SUGGESTED DOCUM
- Page 90 and 91:
DOCUMENT (Title and acronym; R sign
- Page 92 and 93:
DOCUMENT (Title and acronym; R sign
- Page 94 and 95:
APPENDIX D: SAMPLE INTERVIEW QUESTI
- Page 96 and 97:
APPENDIX E: SSMP REVIEW CHECKLIST -
- Page 98 and 99:
Note: SSMP Element Compliant with D
- Page 100 and 101:
SSMP Element Compliant with DRAFT G
- Page 102 and 103:
APPENDIX F: DISCUSSION OF CONTENTS
- Page 104 and 105:
candidates for the committee so tha
- Page 106 and 107:
US DOT Federal Transit Administrati
- Page 108 and 109:
the time. During preliminary engine
- Page 110 and 111:
• Plans - who prepares, who can m
- Page 112 and 113:
U.S. Department of Transportation F
- Page 114 and 115:
• Serve as a resource by lending
- Page 116 and 117:
c. Peak Vehicle Requirement include
- Page 118 and 119:
3 PMOC review of Grantee’s Operat
- Page 120 and 121:
Requirement PMOC Review Comments 5C
- Page 122 and 123:
waiver is requested are not produce
- Page 124 and 125:
(5) To provide PMOCs with recommend
- Page 126 and 127:
4.1.2 Pre-Award Purchaser’s Requi
- Page 128 and 129:
5.0 PMOC REVIEW OF PROJECT SPONSOR
- Page 130 and 131:
• If no, examine contract files,
- Page 132 and 133:
6.3.2 Corrective Action: The Grante
- Page 134 and 135:
8.0 APPENDICES 8.1 Sample Review Ce
- Page 136 and 137:
comply? 5.3.1.5 Are the vehicle bod
- Page 138 and 139:
US DOT Federal Transit Administrati
- Page 140 and 141:
including: the applicability of Fed
- Page 142 and 143:
• Each document addresses the int
- Page 144 and 145:
APPENDIX A: CHECKLIST OP Section Is
- Page 146 and 147: orders: 5.6.2.1 Is PDR consistent w
- Page 148 and 149: design-to-budget approach that main
- Page 150 and 151: 15) Step the project forward using
- Page 152 and 153: 2.2 The New Starts Process New Star
- Page 154 and 155: 3.0 OBJECTIVES During the initial e
- Page 156 and 157: 7.0 REPORT, PRESENTATION, RECONCILI
- Page 158 and 159: provisions) to make detailed design
- Page 160 and 161: 6) Identify any unknown or uncertai
- Page 162 and 163: APPENDIX A Scope Review Checklist E
- Page 164 and 165: o Development of strategies for min
- Page 166 and 167: to then be backfilled or would othe
- Page 168 and 169: • Major or critical work details;
- Page 170 and 171: It is important to select a project
- Page 172 and 173: 6.2 Preliminary Document Review Upo
- Page 174 and 175: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 176 and 177: o Level 4: Subdivide Level 3 as fol
- Page 178 and 179: • Is integrated with and makes ad
- Page 180 and 181: APPENDIX B Cost Estimate Review Che
- Page 182 and 183: o Confirm that cost estimates are b
- Page 184 and 185: 12) Appendices a) Grantee Project I
- Page 186 and 187: This sample of 118 cost items was s
- Page 188 and 189: consistently accurate. In addition,
- Page 190 and 191: SCC-10.02 Earth Excavation Although
- Page 192 and 193: The scope review identifies risk in
- Page 194 and 195: • Producer Price Index (PPI) - Th
- Page 198 and 199: EXHIBIT D-1: PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
- Page 200 and 201: 3.0 OBJECTIVES FTA’s objective is
- Page 202 and 203: E) Lead times and durations for equ
- Page 204 and 205: activity durations. Critical path f
- Page 206 and 207: US DOT Federal Transit Administrati
- Page 208 and 209: orders may direct the PMOC to reeva
- Page 210 and 211: Design‐Build or CM‐GC), the pro
- Page 212 and 213: degree of understanding among the p
- Page 214 and 215: management labor and profit/fee. Su
- Page 216 and 217: US DOT Federal Transit Administrati
- Page 218 and 219: Construction Risk is subdivided int
- Page 220 and 221: Category or sub‐category cost ele
- Page 222 and 223: with the construction contractor. T
- Page 224 and 225: Management Plan; these recommendati
- Page 226 and 227: etween risk reduction and risk acce
- Page 228 and 229: 75% construction 85% 90% constructi
- Page 230 and 231: milestones, the value of expected m
- Page 232 and 233: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 234 and 235: 4.2 Guidance coordination of platfo
- Page 236 and 237: communicate with the vehicle manufa
- Page 238 and 239: APPENDIX A FTA Request for Informat
- Page 240 and 241: APPENDIX B OP 41 ADA Review - Level
- Page 242 and 243: 4.1 Legislative • The Safe, Accou
- Page 244 and 245: 4) Cost estimate in year-of-expendi
- Page 246 and 247:
U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 248 and 249:
• Project Schedule (Master Schedu
- Page 250 and 251:
d) Assessed safety and security iss
- Page 252 and 253:
U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 254 and 255:
• Interim Guidance on Design-Buil
- Page 256 and 257:
(3) Appropriateness of the proposed
- Page 258 and 259:
7) Project Schedule The PMOC should
- Page 260 and 261:
U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 262 and 263:
2) The Grantee’s program for adva
- Page 264 and 265:
2. Identify all apparent discrepanc
- Page 266 and 267:
• The PMOC shall assess whether t
- Page 268 and 269:
to FD phase of the project, should
- Page 270 and 271:
Table 1, continued: Expected Attrib
- Page 272 and 273:
• Real Estate Acquisition Managem
- Page 274 and 275:
U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 276 and 277:
performed Quality assurance records
- Page 278 and 279:
plan that ensures the necessary qua
- Page 280 and 281:
U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 282 and 283:
5.3 Systems/Facilities Integration
- Page 284:
6.2 Successful completion and recor