FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• The construction phase for the Line and Stations Contracts is approximately 3 years spanning<br />
from the 1st quarter of 2009 to December 2011.<br />
Thus, the duration for the design phase is 2.25 years and the total construction phase duration is<br />
approximately 4 years. The total project duration is from October 2006 to December 2011, or 5 years and<br />
3 months (5.25 years).<br />
These summary project performance schedules for the design and construction phases allow the estimates<br />
to be escalated to more fully represent the likely YOE estimates for each phase. Consequently, these<br />
project expenditure schedules were used to escalate the year 2006 dollar estimates to the more likely yearof-expenditure.<br />
The project schedule in its current form lacks the detail to determine the validity of the longest path of the<br />
project. Critical areas such as right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, wetland mitigation and<br />
construction are insufficient in detail to confirm if the schedule is reasonable and to estimate a probability<br />
of schedule slippage.<br />
The methodology used in the [title of Grantee’s estimate] to account for the effects of inflation is sound.<br />
A cost loading by Standard Cost Category items was performed for each year of the design and<br />
construction year. In other words, between the base year of 2006 and the end of construction of 2011, the<br />
standard cost category work items from the Line, Stations, and Breakout Contracts were estimated in<br />
2006 dollars and then these cost items were segregated/time-phased according to the anticipated year of<br />
performance. Once these out-year design and construction costs for all contracts were calculated and<br />
allocated according to expected year of expenditure or performance, the appropriate escalation factor (4%<br />
compounded annually) corresponding to that year was applied.<br />
The second issue in this conversion of year 2006 dollar costs to the YOE costs is the inflationary index to<br />
be applied. As previously mentioned, the [Grantee’s] Project Cost Estimates use a 4% compounded<br />
annual inflation factor. The indices available to review and compare the accuracy of this percentage<br />
included the following:<br />
• <strong>FTA</strong> <strong>Transit</strong> Price Index – Study was published in 1995 and completed by [name of consultant].<br />
The study developed a transit specific index to estimate the future effects of inflation on major<br />
transit capital projects. The index for heavy construction projects was 3.5% over the next twentyyear<br />
period covering these project development schedules.<br />
• [Commercial cost index] Heavy Construction Cost Data Historical Cost Indices – Annual report<br />
identifies cost impacts for various heavy construction projects. This report indicates an the<br />
average cost increase (index increase) of 3.6% for overall heavy construction projects over the<br />
past six and a quarter years in the 2000 decade (2000 – first quarter 2006).<br />
• Engineering News Record (ENR) – This magazine produces a construction cost index that is<br />
reflective of actual cost change rather than a forecaster of future change. Nevertheless, it offers<br />
some insight into the most recent cost change in the heavy construction field. The ENR<br />
Construction Cost Index has a materials and labor component. Based on the ENR June 2006<br />
Construction Cost Index, the percent change of construction costs over the past year is 3.8%.<br />
OP 33 Capital Cost Estimate Review<br />
Revision 0, June 2008<br />
Page D-9