FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ... FTA Oversight Procedures - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...
APPENDIX A Scope Review Checklist Each design package, contract or budget unit, or scope element is to be reviewed against these criteria as applicable 1 . Language in the review shall incorporate as much of this terminology and concept as practical and consistent with grantee’s project design or construction plan. General Design and Construction for Guideway, Stations, Support Facilities, Sitework • Site investigation o Pre-construction site reconnaissance visits have been made; o Site boundary and existing conditions surveys are complete; o Geotechnical investigations are complete. o Design in response to geotechnical and other below-grade conditions is appropriate. Ground subsidence, ground modification and structural protections issues have been identified and resolved; Rock characteristics (fracture planes, hardness and cleavage) have been established in the form of at least two parameters for the design of the rock support in the station caverns, the crossover caverns, the TBM tunnels, drill/blast tunnels, etc. Subsurface exploration or laboratory testing program, review of building types and foundations and methods of construction are completed. Mass balance diagrams complete for vertical alignments on fill or cut; Identification of buried structures and utilities; Identification of contaminated soils and other hazardous material on site and provision for removal or remediation has been made. • Civil, Structural, Architectural, Trackwork, Sitework documents possess a comparable level of definition, clarity, presentation and cross-referencing. Design, construction, system and vehicle interfaces are well known and defined. Design Reports, Concept of Operations Report, and configuration studies are adequate and complete. Work descriptions and definitions used in designs and specifications are consistent and uniformly applied. The project is constructible. Adequate construction access and staging areas are defined. Contracting Strategy and Packaging The Grantee’s construction planning whether at a project or contract package level has sufficiently analyzed and adequately addressed the following elements: • Availability to and use by the construction contractor of site investigations and geotechnical studies. • Adequacy of the General Conditions of the Contract with respect to requirements for site access, schedule, unit prices, additional compensation, liquidated damages, unforeseen conditions including geotechnical, the construction contractor’s design/engineering scope of work, mobilization costs, cash flow in general, bonds, insurance, taxes, maintenance and 1 Not every project will include every item in the list above. OP 32C Project Scope Review Revision 0, June 2008 Page A-1
warranty provisions, contractor field management and supervision and socio-economic requirements, among other things. • Market conditions o Market conditions for the state/regional/local construction economy for the general contractors/subcontractors on public works and private; o Market conditions for the national construction economy for transit general contractors/subcontractors. o Availability of labor for various trades such as electricians, etc. o Availability of major materials at the bulk commodity level (fuel, cement, steel, copper, plywood/lumber, etc.) and the finished component level (traction power supply and distribution, train control elements, vehicles, microprocessor equipment, etc.) o Availability of construction equipment/sequencing/timeframe requirements for specially designed, or project specific equipment such as cranes, launching girders, pre mix plants, barges, etc. • Accessing and occupancy of project construction sites o Transportation of project materials to the various jobsites/access points/laydown areas. o Local community restrictions and accommodations. o Temporary Construction/Facility requirements and mobilizations. o Weather impacts or concerns and protection of the work. o Special projects requirements such as permits, environmental inclusive of wetlands, site availability or work day or track window requirements; impacts such as transportation, social and economic conditions, public open space, historic and archaeological resources, air quality, noise and vibration, contaminated materials and natural resources. • Grantee’s construction contract package planning has sufficiently analyzed and adequately addressed the following elements: o Contract packaging for Third-party construction contracts has been structured to maximize competition; o Contract packages have been kept small enough to allow mid-sized contractors to bid without teaming as joint ventures (which tends to yield higher costs); o “Procurement only” contracts have been minimized, recognizing there is a higher claims risk when the installation contractor does not have full control of the materials; o Third party procurement contracts have been utilized only where long lead-time items will impact project schedule if purchased by construction contractor; o Force Account procurement contracts have been utilized only in cases where agency has substantial market leverage or “purchasing power”; o Incorporated advance utility / utility relocation contracts, utilizing significant float for these delay-prone activities; cost effectiveness of identifying waste sites / borrow sites to be used at contractor’s option as well as advance agreements with utilities and agencies have been negotiated (for TBM power supply, for example), to again be utilized at contractor’s option. o Contract packaging and project schedule have been coordinated to minimize overextension of agency force account personnel, critical third party (inclusive of Utilities and Fire/Life safety test witnessing or installation work; o Timing of major bid activity, within schedule constraints, will be managed to maximize contractor competition, with consideration to other major project(s) status in the region such as highway or redevelopment projects; OP 32C Project Scope Review Revision 0, June 2008 Page A-2
- Page 112 and 113: U.S. Department of Transportation F
- Page 114 and 115: • Serve as a resource by lending
- Page 116 and 117: c. Peak Vehicle Requirement include
- Page 118 and 119: 3 PMOC review of Grantee’s Operat
- Page 120 and 121: Requirement PMOC Review Comments 5C
- Page 122 and 123: waiver is requested are not produce
- Page 124 and 125: (5) To provide PMOCs with recommend
- Page 126 and 127: 4.1.2 Pre-Award Purchaser’s Requi
- Page 128 and 129: 5.0 PMOC REVIEW OF PROJECT SPONSOR
- Page 130 and 131: • If no, examine contract files,
- Page 132 and 133: 6.3.2 Corrective Action: The Grante
- Page 134 and 135: 8.0 APPENDICES 8.1 Sample Review Ce
- Page 136 and 137: comply? 5.3.1.5 Are the vehicle bod
- Page 138 and 139: US DOT Federal Transit Administrati
- Page 140 and 141: including: the applicability of Fed
- Page 142 and 143: • Each document addresses the int
- Page 144 and 145: APPENDIX A: CHECKLIST OP Section Is
- Page 146 and 147: orders: 5.6.2.1 Is PDR consistent w
- Page 148 and 149: design-to-budget approach that main
- Page 150 and 151: 15) Step the project forward using
- Page 152 and 153: 2.2 The New Starts Process New Star
- Page 154 and 155: 3.0 OBJECTIVES During the initial e
- Page 156 and 157: 7.0 REPORT, PRESENTATION, RECONCILI
- Page 158 and 159: provisions) to make detailed design
- Page 160 and 161: 6) Identify any unknown or uncertai
- Page 164 and 165: o Development of strategies for min
- Page 166 and 167: to then be backfilled or would othe
- Page 168 and 169: • Major or critical work details;
- Page 170 and 171: It is important to select a project
- Page 172 and 173: 6.2 Preliminary Document Review Upo
- Page 174 and 175: U.S. DOT Federal Transit Administra
- Page 176 and 177: o Level 4: Subdivide Level 3 as fol
- Page 178 and 179: • Is integrated with and makes ad
- Page 180 and 181: APPENDIX B Cost Estimate Review Che
- Page 182 and 183: o Confirm that cost estimates are b
- Page 184 and 185: 12) Appendices a) Grantee Project I
- Page 186 and 187: This sample of 118 cost items was s
- Page 188 and 189: consistently accurate. In addition,
- Page 190 and 191: SCC-10.02 Earth Excavation Although
- Page 192 and 193: The scope review identifies risk in
- Page 194 and 195: • Producer Price Index (PPI) - Th
- Page 196 and 197: APPENDICES PROJECT COST ESTIMATE ([
- Page 198 and 199: EXHIBIT D-1: PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
- Page 200 and 201: 3.0 OBJECTIVES FTA’s objective is
- Page 202 and 203: E) Lead times and durations for equ
- Page 204 and 205: activity durations. Critical path f
- Page 206 and 207: US DOT Federal Transit Administrati
- Page 208 and 209: orders may direct the PMOC to reeva
- Page 210 and 211: Design‐Build or CM‐GC), the pro
APPENDIX A<br />
Scope Review Checklist<br />
Each design package, contract or budget unit, or scope element is to be reviewed against these criteria<br />
as applicable 1 . Language in the review shall incorporate as much of this terminology and concept as<br />
practical and consistent with grantee’s project design or construction plan.<br />
General Design and Construction for Guideway, Stations, Support Facilities, Sitework<br />
• Site investigation<br />
o Pre-construction site reconnaissance visits have been made;<br />
o Site boundary and existing conditions surveys are complete;<br />
o Geotechnical investigations are complete.<br />
o Design in response to geotechnical and other below-grade conditions is appropriate.<br />
Ground subsidence, ground modification and structural protections issues have<br />
been identified and resolved;<br />
Rock characteristics (fracture planes, hardness and cleavage) have been<br />
established in the form of at least two parameters for the design of the rock<br />
support in the station caverns, the crossover caverns, the TBM tunnels,<br />
drill/blast tunnels, etc.<br />
Subsurface exploration or laboratory testing program, review of building types<br />
and foundations and methods of construction are completed.<br />
Mass balance diagrams complete for vertical alignments on fill or cut;<br />
Identification of buried structures and utilities;<br />
Identification of contaminated soils and other hazardous material on site and<br />
provision for removal or remediation has been made.<br />
• Civil, Structural, Architectural, Trackwork, Sitework documents possess a comparable level<br />
of definition, clarity, presentation and cross-referencing. Design, construction, system and<br />
vehicle interfaces are well known and defined. Design Reports, Concept of Operations<br />
Report, and configuration studies are adequate and complete. Work descriptions and<br />
definitions used in designs and specifications are consistent and uniformly applied. The<br />
project is constructible. Adequate construction access and staging areas are defined.<br />
Contracting Strategy and Packaging<br />
The Grantee’s construction planning whether at a project or contract package level has<br />
sufficiently analyzed and adequately addressed the following elements:<br />
• Availability to and use by the construction contractor of site investigations and geotechnical<br />
studies.<br />
• Adequacy of the General Conditions of the Contract with respect to requirements for site<br />
access, schedule, unit prices, additional compensation, liquidated damages, unforeseen<br />
conditions including geotechnical, the construction contractor’s design/engineering scope of<br />
work, mobilization costs, cash flow in general, bonds, insurance, taxes, maintenance and<br />
1 Not every project will include every item in the list above.<br />
OP 32C Project Scope Review<br />
Revision 0, June 2008<br />
Page A-1