BASELINE STUDY 5, Thailand - Forest Trends
BASELINE STUDY 5, Thailand - Forest Trends
BASELINE STUDY 5, Thailand - Forest Trends
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8. STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS<br />
8.1 Government<br />
Ministry of Natural Resources and the Environment (MNRE)<br />
Royal <strong>Forest</strong>ry Department (RFD) is responsible for forest areas outside of protected areas, as well as promoting<br />
community forestry and private sector plantations. Since the establishment of the MNRE, RFD staffing has<br />
been limited in its key functions and relegated mainly to the provincial level. There is often confusion and overlap<br />
between the functions and tasks of RFD and the Department of National Parks, and according to ITTO<br />
(2006: 86) there exists a “lack of clear vision among public sector administrators of what the [RFD’s] mission is<br />
and what its functions and resources should be.”<br />
Divisions of particular relevance for forest governance include:<br />
Private Reforestation Division promotes private plantation investment by providing financial incentives to<br />
smallholders to establish tree plantations (reforestation and plantation establishment), targeting rural villages<br />
as a poverty alleviation measure;<br />
Division of <strong>Forest</strong> Protection and Fire Control is responsible for illegal logging issues, along with the Division<br />
of <strong>Forest</strong> Law<br />
Division of <strong>Forest</strong> Law is in charge of detailing national laws as they pertain to forest management in the<br />
country.<br />
Community <strong>Forest</strong>ry Division is responsible for the drafting and implementation of community forestry<br />
bills and programs. It supports local communities to manage their forests to some degree, but has been<br />
limited to pilot projects in the past. The Community <strong>Forest</strong> Division of the RFD supports local communities<br />
to manage their forests to some degree, although for now it only includes pilot projects until the Community<br />
<strong>Forest</strong>ry Act is finally passed.<br />
Permission Division: is responsible for regulating and monitoring the country’s systematic procedures in<br />
the country’s wood import and export industry, including methods to obtain a wood export certificate.<br />
National Parks, Wildlife and Plan Conservation Department (DNP) is responsible for protected areas in <strong>Thailand</strong>.<br />
<strong>Forest</strong> Industry Organization (FIO) is also an arm of the MNRE, but distinct from the Royal <strong>Forest</strong> Department.<br />
24 It often acts as the business arm of the RFD, however. The FIO is a state-owned forestry enterprise,<br />
founded in 1947, involved in a wide array of forest activities, including plantation and resource management,<br />
industrial wood processing and marketing, tourism, conservation and social development. The FIO is involved in<br />
the selling of confiscated wood, reforestation, teak plantation development and management, and log exports.<br />
The FIO is the only agency in <strong>Thailand</strong> that can legally export wood logs, including teak (notably not allowed by<br />
the private sector); however, the FIO log export volumes are minimal. Prior to the logging ban, the FIO also<br />
managed logging concessions.<br />
FIO receives governmental funds to operate special plantation projects, and must raise the revenues for all<br />
other operations. The FIO in general focuses more on rubber and eucalyptus plantations rather than teak in<br />
24 Although the RFD Director General sits on the FIO Board.<br />
© EU FLEGT Facility, <strong>BASELINE</strong> <strong>STUDY</strong> 5, <strong>Thailand</strong>: Overview of <strong>Forest</strong> Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade, July 2011<br />
This Action is funded by the European Union and the governments of Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and the UK. The views expressed herein<br />
can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union.<br />
www.euflegt.efi.int<br />
47