BASELINE STUDY 5, Thailand - Forest Trends
BASELINE STUDY 5, Thailand - Forest Trends
BASELINE STUDY 5, Thailand - Forest Trends
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 2: Major Pulp Producers in <strong>Thailand</strong><br />
Pulp and Paper Company Location Capacity in Company Contracting Tree<br />
2006 (tonnes) Farmers<br />
Advance Agro Prachinburi Province<br />
515,000 Advance Agro<br />
Phoenix Pulp and Paper Khon Kaen 235,000 Phoenix Pulp and Paper<br />
Panjapol Pulp Industry Ayutthaya 110,000 -<br />
SCG Paper a Ratchaburi 100,000 Siam <strong>Forest</strong>ry<br />
Siam Cellulose Kanchanaburi 86,000 Siam <strong>Forest</strong>ry<br />
Environment Pulp and Paper b Nakhonsawan 100,000 -<br />
Total 1,146,000<br />
a Former Siam Pulp and Paper<br />
b Started up in October 2004<br />
Sources: Modified from Boulay 2009; FAO 2008; and PRNewswire 2008.<br />
Table 3: Major Thai Woodchip Producers<br />
<strong>Thailand</strong> has six major plantation hardwood woodchip producers, some of which operate independently of<br />
pulp mills, with at least four of these targeting the export market.<br />
Company Location Woodchip Production Capacity<br />
(BDMT/year)<br />
Soon Hua Seng Bangpakong Mill 200,000<br />
Siam Tree Development (JV with Chonburi Province 200,000<br />
Japanese Itochu Corp.)<br />
Thai Wittawat Surin Province 40,000-50,000<br />
Kittawee Surin Province 40,000-50,000 (mostly selling to<br />
domestic mills)<br />
Thai Martin Prachuab Kiri Khan Province 145,000 (mostly selling to Siam<br />
Pulp)<br />
Siam Cement Group Various provinces N.A., but includes exports<br />
Sources: Barney 2005; RISI 2008; and Jones 2010.<br />
© EU FLEGT Facility, <strong>BASELINE</strong> <strong>STUDY</strong> 5, <strong>Thailand</strong>: Overview of <strong>Forest</strong> Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade, July 2011<br />
This Action is funded by the European Union and the governments of Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and the UK. The views expressed herein<br />
can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union.<br />
www.euflegt.efi.int<br />
41