24.10.2013 Views

1 DNA discovery

1 DNA discovery

1 DNA discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DISCOVERING THE STRUCTURE OF<br />

X-ray<br />

photograph of<br />

<strong>DNA</strong> taken by<br />

Rosalind Franklin<br />

at King’s<br />

College London<br />

<strong>DNA</strong><br />

THE DISCOVERY OF THE STRUCTURE OF <strong>DNA</strong><br />

as announced by Francis Crick and James Watson in their 1953 paper A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic<br />

Acid published in Nature was a landmark moment in biology...but who else contributed to this <strong>discovery</strong>?<br />

SPECIFICATION CONTENT<br />

Old: Know the different approaches used<br />

by Crick and Watson, (limited to modelling) and<br />

Franklin, (limited to X-ray crystallography) when<br />

researching the structure of <strong>DNA</strong>. New:<br />

Describe (in outline only) how the work of<br />

Chargaff, Franklin and Wilkins, and Watson and<br />

Crick, using different lines of evidence, led to<br />

the <strong>discovery</strong> of <strong>DNA</strong>; know that the<br />

development of the scientific theory of the<br />

structure of <strong>DNA</strong> is an example of the<br />

collaborative nature of science, and how new<br />

scientific knowledge is validated (for example<br />

peer review).<br />

STARTER<br />

Play kinaesthetic true or false. Read<br />

statements and ask class to make a T (stand<br />

up, arms out) if the answer is true, or an X<br />

(stand up, arms crossed) if the answer is false.<br />

Alternatively, to focus on how science works,<br />

use the ‘would you rather...?’ activity.<br />

STIMULUS<br />

Begin by asking students to read about 6<br />

contributions to the <strong>discovery</strong> of the structure<br />

of <strong>DNA</strong>. Working in 3s, ask them to rank the<br />

contributions in order of importance on the<br />

pyramid grid. Discuss justifications. Have a<br />

colleague deliver the letter to the problem page.<br />

Ask students to discuss letter in pairs.<br />

QUESTIONS<br />

Allow some individual thinking time, then<br />

ask students to write the question they think it<br />

is important to address on a post it. Share in<br />

pairs, then snowball to 4s. Each 4 should write<br />

one question on A4 paper, and place in the<br />

centre of circle. Read all questions aloud then<br />

ask students to vote for the most important<br />

question by placing their post it on that<br />

question. Rank the questions from most to<br />

least important, as an agenda for the lesson.<br />

ENQUIRY<br />

Questions that the teacher can use to<br />

provoke thought are provided on the COSE<br />

guidance page.<br />

EVALUATION<br />

Find out what students thought about the<br />

enquiry by laying the emoticons on the floor<br />

and asking them to choose the face that best<br />

Crick’s sketch of <strong>DNA</strong><br />

represents their feelings about the enquiry.<br />

Ask students what they need to work on<br />

for next time. Write this on the target board to<br />

use as a reminder next enquiry.<br />

NEXT STEPS<br />

Task students to reply to the letter,<br />

answering the question What does the story of<br />

the <strong>discovery</strong> of <strong>DNA</strong> tell us about how science<br />

works? using examples to back up their ideas.<br />

This should be handed in in the envelope<br />

provided.<br />

www.ulster.ac.uk/scienceinsociety/ [ 1 ] Resource for Teachers<br />

Images courtesy of the Wellcome Library


T R U E<br />

Each body<br />

cell contains only the<br />

genetic information<br />

needed to do its job.<br />

F<br />

Only sex cells<br />

contain<br />

chromosomes.<br />

F<br />

Genes<br />

determine<br />

everything about<br />

you.<br />

<strong>DNA</strong> is a long<br />

molecule.<br />

Bacteria and<br />

fungi don’t have<br />

<strong>DNA</strong>.<br />

F F<br />

<strong>DNA</strong> is made<br />

from<br />

chromosomes.<br />

F<br />

<strong>DNA</strong> is made<br />

from genes.<br />

F<br />

Genes are<br />

made from <strong>DNA</strong>.<br />

T T<br />

F A L s E<br />

www.ulster.ac.uk/scienceinsociety/ [ 2 ] Resource for Teachers


WOULD YOU RATHER...?<br />

Print the pairs of statements below and, taking one at a time, ask students to stand next to<br />

the one they would rather. Share and evaluate the quality of reasons. In each case, ask<br />

whether the choices are mutually exclusive and ask how they link to the <strong>DNA</strong> <strong>discovery</strong> story.<br />

compete v collaborate<br />

win at all costs<br />

be recognised<br />

for your work<br />

be accurate and<br />

correct but slow<br />

deal face-to-face with<br />

problems with people<br />

ask for something<br />

and risk refusal<br />

v<br />

lose but keep your<br />

principles intact<br />

v<br />

v<br />

v<br />

v<br />

remain<br />

anonymous<br />

be fast but miss<br />

details<br />

ignore problems<br />

with people<br />

take something<br />

without consent<br />

www.ulster.ac.uk/scienceinsociety/ [ 3 ] Resource for Teachers


1<br />

3<br />

2<br />

4 5 6<br />

www.ulster.ac.uk/scienceinsociety/ [ 4 ] Resource for Teachers


the <strong>discovery</strong> pyramid<br />

Instructions<br />

Read the 6 cards that describe the contributions of different<br />

people to the <strong>discovery</strong> of <strong>DNA</strong>. Rank the contributions, with the<br />

most important placed at the top of the grid and the least along<br />

the base. What are your justifications for this order?<br />

Friedrich Miescher was the first person to<br />

isolate the chemical we now know to be<br />

<strong>DNA</strong> from cells. He had been trying to<br />

purify proteins in white blood cells<br />

(collected from pus in old bandages sent<br />

to him from a clinic) but noticed a<br />

chemical that did not behave like a<br />

protein. He realised he had discovered a<br />

new chemical (<strong>DNA</strong>) and later found the<br />

same chemical in other types of cell.<br />

Linus Pauling used a new method of<br />

model-making to create 3D molecular<br />

structures to propose (incorrectly) that<br />

<strong>DNA</strong> was a triple helix. He built his model<br />

using known molecular distances and<br />

bond angles, with the knowledge that<br />

helical molecular structures were possible.<br />

Maurice Wilkins initial work on <strong>DNA</strong><br />

showed that it could be crystallised for<br />

study by X-ray diffraction. He discussed<br />

the structure of <strong>DNA</strong> with Crick and<br />

Watson, showing them Franklinʼs image<br />

and helping them to interpret it. He later<br />

used X-ray crystallography to confirm and<br />

refine Watson and Crickʼs double helical<br />

structure for <strong>DNA</strong>.<br />

Erwin Chargaff discovered, using paper<br />

chromatography, that <strong>DNA</strong> had a different<br />

composition in different species: the bases<br />

appeared in a different order. He also found<br />

that no matter what species <strong>DNA</strong> came from,<br />

the number of purines was equal to the<br />

number of pyrimidines, and in particular that<br />

the amount of adenine (A) was equal to the<br />

amount of thymine (T) and the amount of<br />

guanine (G) was always equal to the amount<br />

of cytosine (C).<br />

Rosalind Franklin studied <strong>DNA</strong> using Xray<br />

crystallography. She prepared <strong>DNA</strong><br />

samples and took the X-ray photograph<br />

that demonstrated that <strong>DNA</strong> was a helix in<br />

shape. She deduced the dimensions of<br />

<strong>DNA</strong> strands and that the phosphate<br />

groups were on the outside of the<br />

molecule. Her X-ray photo was shown to<br />

Crick and Watson, who said that it was<br />

key to them discovering the structure of<br />

<strong>DNA</strong> when they did.<br />

James Watson and Francis Crick used<br />

Pauling’s modelling method and Franklin’s Xray<br />

photograph and measurements of <strong>DNA</strong><br />

(given to them by Wilkins without her consent)<br />

to solve the structure of <strong>DNA</strong>. Using card cutouts,<br />

they built <strong>DNA</strong> as a helix containing two<br />

strands connected with hydrogen bonds.<br />

Bases (A, T, G, and C) are attached to sugars<br />

on a backbone. The backbone is made of<br />

sugars and phosphate groups. The ‘rungs’ of<br />

<strong>DNA</strong> are made of bases. A is always paired<br />

with T and G is always paired with C.<br />

www.ulster.ac.uk/scienceinsociety/ [ 5 ] Resource for Teachers


Dear Auntie Anna,<br />

I fear my scientific career is over before it has<br />

even begun.<br />

I have been finding out about the <strong>discovery</strong> of <strong>DNA</strong><br />

and it seems that in the race to find things out<br />

scientists will do anything to get the data they need,<br />

even cheat. Look at Rosalind Franklin - she didn’t<br />

get the Nobel Prize with Crick, Watson and Wilkins<br />

even though her data was crucial to the <strong>discovery</strong><br />

of <strong>DNA</strong>’s structure.<br />

Can’t scientists work together for the common<br />

good?<br />

I am thinking of giving up science for something<br />

more collaborative.<br />

Please help!<br />

RJ<br />

www.ulster.ac.uk/scienceinsociety/ [ 6 ] Resource for Teachers


evaluating with emoticons<br />

Cut out and laminate the emoticons below and place them face-up on the floor (you may need multiple copies). Ask students to<br />

reflect on how they felt during the enquiry, and why, and ask them to select the emoticon that best represents their feelings.<br />

Discuss as a class a) what was positive about the enquiry and b) how the group could improve their enquiry skills. You may<br />

want to provide blank laminated paper and a marker for students who cannot find an appropriate emoticon.<br />

www.ulster.ac.uk/scienceinsociety/ [ 7 ] Resource for Teachers


TARGET:<br />

The more positive you feel about how we hit this target<br />

the closer to the centre you place your sticker.<br />

www.ulster.ac.uk/scienceinsociety/ [ 8 ] Resource for Teachers


the<br />

Miescher<br />

In 1869, no-one knew that <strong>DNA</strong><br />

existed. Friedrich Miescher wanted to find<br />

out which proteins were present in white<br />

blood cells. He asked clinics to send him<br />

their patients’ old bandages filled with pus,<br />

and he started to analyse them. However,<br />

he found something that wasn’t protein: it<br />

had much more phosphorus and wouldn’t<br />

break down in the same way as proteins.<br />

What he had discovered was <strong>DNA</strong>.<br />

Chargaff<br />

information<br />

Chargaff wanted to find out if there was<br />

any difference between the <strong>DNA</strong> of different<br />

species. He made 2 major discoveries: that<br />

the order of nucleotides (a nucleotide is a<br />

big molecule made from a phosphate group,<br />

a sugar and a base) is different in different<br />

species, and that <strong>DNA</strong> has properties that<br />

remain constant in different species: the<br />

amount of adenine (A) is always equal to the<br />

amount of thymine (T) and the amount of<br />

guanine (G) is always equal to the amount of<br />

cytosine (C).<br />

Franklin and Wilkins<br />

Francis Wilkins had the idea of studying<br />

<strong>DNA</strong> using X-ray crystallography, and had<br />

started this work at King’s College with his<br />

PhD student, Ray Gosling, when Rosalind<br />

Franklin was appointed by John Randall.<br />

Franklin took the clearest picture of <strong>DNA</strong><br />

using X-ray diffraction (Photograph 51), and<br />

it was this that demonstrated that <strong>DNA</strong> had<br />

a helical structure.<br />

Crick and Watson<br />

Francis Crick and James Watson were<br />

determined to discover the structure of<br />

<strong>DNA</strong>. They used a molecular modelling<br />

technique devised by Linus Pauling to<br />

create a large scale model <strong>DNA</strong> in their<br />

laboratory. They used the structure of the<br />

constituent parts and known atomic<br />

distances to build their model.<br />

Serendipity<br />

Crick and Watson shared an office with<br />

Jerry Donohue, a theoretical chemist. Crick<br />

and Watson were using published<br />

information about the structure of the bases,<br />

but Donohue was able to tell them that this<br />

was likely to be incorrect. Using the revised<br />

structural information, along with the X-ray<br />

data that had obtained from INSERT, Crick<br />

and Watson were able to revise their<br />

structure so that it obeyed Chargaff’s rule<br />

and so that complementary bases fitted<br />

together (A with T and G with C). They<br />

found that <strong>DNA</strong> is a double helix made of a<br />

sugar-phosphate backbone and<br />

complementary base pairs<br />

<strong>DNA</strong> <strong>discovery</strong><br />

Publication<br />

Watson and Crick published their<br />

double helical structure of <strong>DNA</strong> in Nature in<br />

1953, along with supporting articles by<br />

Wilkins, Stokes and Wilson (who used X-ray<br />

crystallography evidence to suggest that the<br />

<strong>DNA</strong> double helix exists in biological<br />

systems) and Franklin and Gosling (who<br />

provide evidence from X-ray crystallography<br />

to support the double helical structure with<br />

the phosphate backbone on the outside of<br />

the helix). Nature is a peer-reviewed journal.<br />

This means that the articles they publish<br />

have been scrutinised by other expert<br />

scientists with expertise in the subject area.<br />

The Nobel Prize<br />

In 1962, the Nobel Prize in Physiology<br />

or Medicine was awarded to Francis Crick,<br />

James Watson and Maurice Wilkins for<br />

“their discoveries concerning the molecular<br />

structure of nucleic acids and its<br />

significance for information transfer in living<br />

material.” Wilkins recognised the<br />

contribution of Rosalind Frankin’s X-ray<br />

analysis of <strong>DNA</strong> in his acceptance speech.<br />

Rosalind Franklin died of cervical cancer in<br />

www.ulster.ac.uk/scienceinsociety/ [ 9 ] Resource for Teachers<br />

1958.<br />

Images © Wellcome Library

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!