Guenter Hilmer - Phd Thesis - Glamorgan Dspace - University of ...
Guenter Hilmer - Phd Thesis - Glamorgan Dspace - University of ... Guenter Hilmer - Phd Thesis - Glamorgan Dspace - University of ...
A.4 Summary of interview results A APPENDICES If you had a problem with creating the Lecture, where and what kind of nature was it? Problems with creating a Lecture-TLS Number Percentage No specific problems 7 77,77 % No Windows look and feel 1 11,11 % Instructions for HEAT were needed 1 11,11 % Table 38: Problems with creating a Lecture-TLS How easy was it for you to link the TLSs together? Difficulty of linking the TLSs Number Percentage Not so easy as the tagging tasks 8 88,88 % Very easy / Easy 1 11,11 % Table 39: Difficulty of linking the TLSs If you had a problem with linking the TLSs together, were and what kind of nature was it? Problems with linking the TLSs Number Percentage Linking technique needs to be modified 6 66,66 % Drag and drop should be used 3 33,33 % Table 40: Problems with linking the TLSs How easy was it for you to reuse some existing material (Database)? Advantages of the material reuse Number Percentage Easy to use 5 55,55 % Good approach 2 22,22 % Reusability can save a lot of time 2 22,22 % Table 41: Advantages of the material reuse 254
A.4 Summary of interview results A APPENDICES Comments: Problems of the material reuse Number Percentage Copyright issues 3 33,33 % Material sharing is critical 2 22,22 % No specific problems 2 22,22 % Better structure and tools needed 1 11,11 % Pay-system is critical 1 11,11 % • quid-pro-quo is preferred Table 42: Problems of the material reuse • no copyright issues within one institutions • no problems with sharing own content How easy was it for you to create the actual WWW material (processing)? Difficulty of processing the created material Number Percentage Very easy / Easy 8 88,88 % Presentation should be improved 1 11,11 % Table 43: Difficulty of processing the created material How good is the presentation of the authored material in the WWW? Quality of material presentation Number Percentage Improvable, not state of the art 7 77,77 % Good 2 22,22 % Table 44: Quality of the presentation of created educational material 255
- Page 203 and 204: 9.2 Future work 9 CONCLUSIONS therm
- Page 205 and 206: 9.3 Contribution to knowledge 9 CON
- Page 207 and 208: REFERENCES REFERENCES [10] Robert J
- Page 209 and 210: REFERENCES REFERENCES [30] Kendall
- Page 211 and 212: REFERENCES REFERENCES [49] Barbara
- Page 213 and 214: REFERENCES REFERENCES [68] A.W. Str
- Page 215 and 216: REFERENCES REFERENCES [88] Melanie
- Page 217 and 218: REFERENCES REFERENCES [110] The Dep
- Page 219 and 220: REFERENCES REFERENCES [131] David A
- Page 221 and 222: REFERENCES REFERENCES [151] Michael
- Page 223 and 224: REFERENCES REFERENCES [174] Allianc
- Page 225 and 226: A Appendices 225 A APPENDICES
- Page 227 and 228: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 229 and 230: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 231 and 232: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 233 and 234: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 235 and 236: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 237 and 238: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 239 and 240: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 241 and 242: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 243 and 244: A.2 Evaluation Worksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 245 and 246: A.3 Evaluation Interviews A APPENDI
- Page 247 and 248: A.4 Summary of interview results A
- Page 249 and 250: A.4 Summary of interview results A
- Page 251 and 252: A.4 Summary of interview results A
- Page 253: A.4 Summary of interview results A
- Page 257 and 258: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES A.5
- Page 259 and 260: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES entr
- Page 261 and 262: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES docu
- Page 263 and 264: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES { i
- Page 265 and 266: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES } if
- Page 267 and 268: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES answ
- Page 269 and 270: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES A.5.
- Page 271 and 272: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES //no
- Page 273 and 274: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES
- Page 275 and 276: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES { al
- Page 277 and 278: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES { di
- Page 279 and 280: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES
- Page 281 and 282: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES d
- Page 283 and 284: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES
- Page 285 and 286: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES i
- Page 287 and 288: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES dr
- Page 289 and 290: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES A.5.
- Page 291 and 292: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES disp
- Page 293 and 294: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES } ]]
- Page 295 and 296: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES tls
- Page 297 and 298: A.6 XEML - eXtensible Educational M
- Page 299: A.7 Contents of CD A APPENDICES A.7
A.4 Summary <strong>of</strong> interview results A APPENDICES<br />
If you had a problem with creating the Lecture, where and what kind <strong>of</strong><br />
nature was it?<br />
Problems with creating a Lecture-TLS Number Percentage<br />
No specific problems 7 77,77 %<br />
No Windows look and feel 1 11,11 %<br />
Instructions for HEAT were needed 1 11,11 %<br />
Table 38: Problems with creating a Lecture-TLS<br />
How easy was it for you to link the TLSs together?<br />
Difficulty <strong>of</strong> linking the TLSs Number Percentage<br />
Not so easy as the tagging tasks 8 88,88 %<br />
Very easy / Easy 1 11,11 %<br />
Table 39: Difficulty <strong>of</strong> linking the TLSs<br />
If you had a problem with linking the TLSs together, were and what kind <strong>of</strong><br />
nature was it?<br />
Problems with linking the TLSs Number Percentage<br />
Linking technique needs to be modified 6 66,66 %<br />
Drag and drop should be used 3 33,33 %<br />
Table 40: Problems with linking the TLSs<br />
How easy was it for you to reuse some existing material (Database)?<br />
Advantages <strong>of</strong> the material reuse Number Percentage<br />
Easy to use 5 55,55 %<br />
Good approach 2 22,22 %<br />
Reusability can save a lot <strong>of</strong> time 2 22,22 %<br />
Table 41: Advantages <strong>of</strong> the material reuse<br />
254