Guenter Hilmer - Phd Thesis - Glamorgan Dspace - University of ...
Guenter Hilmer - Phd Thesis - Glamorgan Dspace - University of ... Guenter Hilmer - Phd Thesis - Glamorgan Dspace - University of ...
REFERENCES REFERENCES [77] John B. Black and Robert O. McClintock. An interpretation construc- tion approach to constructivist design. In B. Wilson, editor, Constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995. [78] David C. Berliner. Educational research: The hardest science of all. Edu- cational Researcher, 31(8):18–20, 2002. [79] Richard E. Clark. Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4):445–459, 1983. [80] Christina Keller and Lars Cernerud. Students’ perceptions of e-learning in university education. Journal of Educational Media, 27, 2002. [81] Ulrike Rinn and Dorothee M. Meister, editors. Didaktik und Neue Medien. Waxmann, Muenster, 1st edition, 2004. [82] Maike Franzen, editor. Mensch und E-Learning. Beitraege zur E-Didaktik und darueber hinaus. Sauerlaender, Aarau, 2003. [83] Helmut Niegemann, Silvia Hessel, Dirk Hochscheid-Mauel, and Kristina Aslanski. Kompendium E-Learning. Springer, Berlin, 2003. [84] Larisa V. Shavinina, editor. International Handbook on Innovation. Else- vier, Amsterdam, 2003. [85] Allan Macpherson, Gill Homan, and Krystal Wilkinson. The implementa- tion and use of e-learning in the corporate university. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17:33–48, 2005. [86] Jeffrey R. Young. Professors give mixed reviews of internet’s educational impact. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(49), August 2005. [87] Diana Harley. Investing in educational technologies: The challenge of reconciling institutional strategies, faculty goals, and student expectations. Technical report, Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of Cal- ifornia, Berkeley, 2002. 214
REFERENCES REFERENCES [88] Melanie Ward and David Newlands. Use of the web in undergraduate teach- ing. Computers and Education, 31:171–184, 1998. [89] Patrick Senac, Frangois Fabre, Emmanuel Chaput, and Michel Diaz. De- sign of hypermedia distributed applications. In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 96 and ED-TELECOM 96. ENSICA, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottesville, VA, June 1996. [90] Michael Korcuska. Software factories for active learning environments. In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 96 and ED-TELECOM 96. Institute for the Learning Sciences, Northwestern University, Association for the Advance- ment of Computing in Education, Charlottesville, VA, June 1996. [91] Dick Bultermann and Lynda Hardmann. Multimedia authoring: State of the art and research challenges. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1000: 575–591, 1995. [92] Sun Microsystems, Inc. Java - The Source for Java Developers. URL . Last accessed June 2009. [93] W3C - World Wide Web Consortium. XML - Extensible Markup Language. URL . Last accessed June 2009. [94] CWI - Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica. SMIL - Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language. URL . Last accessed June 2009. [95] Microsoft Corporation. .net Framework. URL . Last accessed June 2009. [96] Julie Cotton. The Theory of Learning Strategies. Kogan Page, London, 1995. [97] Julie Cotton. The Theory of Learners. Kogan Page, London, 1995. [98] Julie Cotton. The Theory of Learning. Kogan Page, London, 1995. 215
- Page 163 and 164: 6.5 Analysis of the post-test inter
- Page 165 and 166: 7 Practical evaluation 7 PRACTICAL
- Page 167 and 168: 7.1 Design 7 PRACTICAL EVALUATION O
- Page 169 and 170: 7.2 Existing material 7 PRACTICAL E
- Page 171 and 172: 7.2 Existing material 7 PRACTICAL E
- Page 173 and 174: 7.3 New material 7 PRACTICAL EVALUA
- Page 175 and 176: 7.3 New material 7 PRACTICAL EVALUA
- Page 177 and 178: 7.4 Summary 7 PRACTICAL EVALUATION
- Page 179 and 180: 7.4 Summary 7 PRACTICAL EVALUATION
- Page 181 and 182: 8 Discussion 8 DISCUSSION The insig
- Page 183 and 184: 8.1 Review of the EFTECS 8 DISCUSSI
- Page 185 and 186: 8.1 Review of the EFTECS 8 DISCUSSI
- Page 187 and 188: 8.2 Review of the HEAT 8 DISCUSSION
- Page 189 and 190: 8.2 Review of the HEAT 8 DISCUSSION
- Page 191 and 192: 8.2 Review of the HEAT 8 DISCUSSION
- Page 193 and 194: 8.3 Critique of the study 8 DISCUSS
- Page 195 and 196: 9 Conclusions 9 CONCLUSIONS In this
- Page 197 and 198: 9.1 Research objectives 9 CONCLUSIO
- Page 199 and 200: 9.2 Future work 9 CONCLUSIONS 9.2 F
- Page 201 and 202: 9.2 Future work 9 CONCLUSIONS Howev
- Page 203 and 204: 9.2 Future work 9 CONCLUSIONS therm
- Page 205 and 206: 9.3 Contribution to knowledge 9 CON
- Page 207 and 208: REFERENCES REFERENCES [10] Robert J
- Page 209 and 210: REFERENCES REFERENCES [30] Kendall
- Page 211 and 212: REFERENCES REFERENCES [49] Barbara
- Page 213: REFERENCES REFERENCES [68] A.W. Str
- Page 217 and 218: REFERENCES REFERENCES [110] The Dep
- Page 219 and 220: REFERENCES REFERENCES [131] David A
- Page 221 and 222: REFERENCES REFERENCES [151] Michael
- Page 223 and 224: REFERENCES REFERENCES [174] Allianc
- Page 225 and 226: A Appendices 225 A APPENDICES
- Page 227 and 228: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 229 and 230: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 231 and 232: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 233 and 234: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 235 and 236: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 237 and 238: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 239 and 240: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 241 and 242: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 243 and 244: A.2 Evaluation Worksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 245 and 246: A.3 Evaluation Interviews A APPENDI
- Page 247 and 248: A.4 Summary of interview results A
- Page 249 and 250: A.4 Summary of interview results A
- Page 251 and 252: A.4 Summary of interview results A
- Page 253 and 254: A.4 Summary of interview results A
- Page 255 and 256: A.4 Summary of interview results A
- Page 257 and 258: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES A.5
- Page 259 and 260: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES entr
- Page 261 and 262: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES docu
- Page 263 and 264: A.5 XSL-Documents A APPENDICES { i
REFERENCES REFERENCES<br />
[77] John B. Black and Robert O. McClintock. An interpretation construc-<br />
tion approach to constructivist design. In B. Wilson, editor, Constructivist<br />
learning environments. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood<br />
Cliffs, NJ, 1995.<br />
[78] David C. Berliner. Educational research: The hardest science <strong>of</strong> all. Edu-<br />
cational Researcher, 31(8):18–20, 2002.<br />
[79] Richard E. Clark. Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review<br />
<strong>of</strong> Educational Research, 53(4):445–459, 1983.<br />
[80] Christina Keller and Lars Cernerud. Students’ perceptions <strong>of</strong> e-learning in<br />
university education. Journal <strong>of</strong> Educational Media, 27, 2002.<br />
[81] Ulrike Rinn and Dorothee M. Meister, editors. Didaktik und Neue Medien.<br />
Waxmann, Muenster, 1st edition, 2004.<br />
[82] Maike Franzen, editor. Mensch und E-Learning. Beitraege zur E-Didaktik<br />
und darueber hinaus. Sauerlaender, Aarau, 2003.<br />
[83] Helmut Niegemann, Silvia Hessel, Dirk Hochscheid-Mauel, and Kristina<br />
Aslanski. Kompendium E-Learning. Springer, Berlin, 2003.<br />
[84] Larisa V. Shavinina, editor. International Handbook on Innovation. Else-<br />
vier, Amsterdam, 2003.<br />
[85] Allan Macpherson, Gill Homan, and Krystal Wilkinson. The implementa-<br />
tion and use <strong>of</strong> e-learning in the corporate university. Journal <strong>of</strong> Workplace<br />
Learning, 17:33–48, 2005.<br />
[86] Jeffrey R. Young. Pr<strong>of</strong>essors give mixed reviews <strong>of</strong> internet’s educational<br />
impact. The Chronicle <strong>of</strong> Higher Education, 51(49), August 2005.<br />
[87] Diana Harley. Investing in educational technologies: The challenge <strong>of</strong><br />
reconciling institutional strategies, faculty goals, and student expectations.<br />
Technical report, Center for Studies in Higher Education, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cal-<br />
ifornia, Berkeley, 2002.<br />
214