Guenter Hilmer - Phd Thesis - Glamorgan Dspace - University of ...
Guenter Hilmer - Phd Thesis - Glamorgan Dspace - University of ... Guenter Hilmer - Phd Thesis - Glamorgan Dspace - University of ...
8.3 Critique of the study 8 DISCUSSION uation. The size of the evaluation group should have been bigger for data on a more quantitative basis. However, the insights gained from the selected evalua- tion group can be regarded as significant on a qualitative basis. It would be ideal in future work to fully implement the HEAT and to use it in a broad field study in a real educational environment, for example a school or a university. 194
9 Conclusions 9 CONCLUSIONS In this chapter the evaluation of each of the objectives of this study will be ad- dressed in turn. The problems and issues that were discussed in chapter 8 are reconsidered in the light of the evaluation of the objectives of the study. The chapter will conclude with suggestions for further work and research. 9.1 Research objectives The three main objectives of this research project, as they have been identified in the literature review in section 2.13 and as they have been addressed during the evaluation and discussion chapters, have been accomplished as stated below. 9.1.1 Creation of a suitable framework for content separation The creation of a framework for the separation of educational from technical con- tent in educational hypermedia was suggested after the literature review and was accomplished at the beginning of this PhD project. The created 3-Layer-Model based on EHPs, TLSs and EMs resulted in the EFTECS framework and addresses the separation of educational and technical content in educational hypermedia. One of the most important issues of this work was the creation of the fine-grained EHPs of teaching and learning strategies within the EHP-layer of the framework. This framework was developed as described in chapter 3. Further on, the EFTECS formed the basis for the XEML and the HEAT and was designed for further ex- tensibility in the future. This extensibility allows the introduction of new EHPs and TLSs as long as the basic EHPs, e.g. HELP-EHP, are included. The results of the interview evaluation in chapter 6, the practical evaluation in chapter 7 and the discussion in chapter 8 show that the EFTECS can be success- fully and effectively used for the separation of the educational and the technical content in educational hypermedia. However, some specific limitations of the framework were discovered especially during the interview evaluation. For example, the complexity of the framework 195
- Page 143 and 144: 5.3 Design of the practical evaluat
- Page 145 and 146: 6 Interview evaluation 6 INTERVIEW
- Page 147 and 148: 6.1 Analysis of the pre-test interv
- Page 149 and 150: 6.1 Analysis of the pre-test interv
- Page 151 and 152: 6.2 Analysis of the manual markup t
- Page 153 and 154: 6.3 Analysis of the mid-test interv
- Page 155 and 156: 6.3 Analysis of the mid-test interv
- Page 157 and 158: 6.4 Analysis of the HEAT based mark
- Page 159 and 160: 6.4 Analysis of the HEAT based mark
- Page 161 and 162: 6.5 Analysis of the post-test inter
- Page 163 and 164: 6.5 Analysis of the post-test inter
- Page 165 and 166: 7 Practical evaluation 7 PRACTICAL
- Page 167 and 168: 7.1 Design 7 PRACTICAL EVALUATION O
- Page 169 and 170: 7.2 Existing material 7 PRACTICAL E
- Page 171 and 172: 7.2 Existing material 7 PRACTICAL E
- Page 173 and 174: 7.3 New material 7 PRACTICAL EVALUA
- Page 175 and 176: 7.3 New material 7 PRACTICAL EVALUA
- Page 177 and 178: 7.4 Summary 7 PRACTICAL EVALUATION
- Page 179 and 180: 7.4 Summary 7 PRACTICAL EVALUATION
- Page 181 and 182: 8 Discussion 8 DISCUSSION The insig
- Page 183 and 184: 8.1 Review of the EFTECS 8 DISCUSSI
- Page 185 and 186: 8.1 Review of the EFTECS 8 DISCUSSI
- Page 187 and 188: 8.2 Review of the HEAT 8 DISCUSSION
- Page 189 and 190: 8.2 Review of the HEAT 8 DISCUSSION
- Page 191 and 192: 8.2 Review of the HEAT 8 DISCUSSION
- Page 193: 8.3 Critique of the study 8 DISCUSS
- Page 197 and 198: 9.1 Research objectives 9 CONCLUSIO
- Page 199 and 200: 9.2 Future work 9 CONCLUSIONS 9.2 F
- Page 201 and 202: 9.2 Future work 9 CONCLUSIONS Howev
- Page 203 and 204: 9.2 Future work 9 CONCLUSIONS therm
- Page 205 and 206: 9.3 Contribution to knowledge 9 CON
- Page 207 and 208: REFERENCES REFERENCES [10] Robert J
- Page 209 and 210: REFERENCES REFERENCES [30] Kendall
- Page 211 and 212: REFERENCES REFERENCES [49] Barbara
- Page 213 and 214: REFERENCES REFERENCES [68] A.W. Str
- Page 215 and 216: REFERENCES REFERENCES [88] Melanie
- Page 217 and 218: REFERENCES REFERENCES [110] The Dep
- Page 219 and 220: REFERENCES REFERENCES [131] David A
- Page 221 and 222: REFERENCES REFERENCES [151] Michael
- Page 223 and 224: REFERENCES REFERENCES [174] Allianc
- Page 225 and 226: A Appendices 225 A APPENDICES
- Page 227 and 228: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 229 and 230: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 231 and 232: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 233 and 234: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 235 and 236: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 237 and 238: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 239 and 240: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 241 and 242: A.1 Evaluation tasksheet A APPENDIC
- Page 243 and 244: A.2 Evaluation Worksheet A APPENDIC
9 Conclusions<br />
9 CONCLUSIONS<br />
In this chapter the evaluation <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the objectives <strong>of</strong> this study will be ad-<br />
dressed in turn. The problems and issues that were discussed in chapter 8 are<br />
reconsidered in the light <strong>of</strong> the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the objectives <strong>of</strong> the study.<br />
The chapter will conclude with suggestions for further work and research.<br />
9.1 Research objectives<br />
The three main objectives <strong>of</strong> this research project, as they have been identified in<br />
the literature review in section 2.13 and as they have been addressed during the<br />
evaluation and discussion chapters, have been accomplished as stated below.<br />
9.1.1 Creation <strong>of</strong> a suitable framework for content separation<br />
The creation <strong>of</strong> a framework for the separation <strong>of</strong> educational from technical con-<br />
tent in educational hypermedia was suggested after the literature review and was<br />
accomplished at the beginning <strong>of</strong> this PhD project. The created 3-Layer-Model<br />
based on EHPs, TLSs and EMs resulted in the EFTECS framework and addresses<br />
the separation <strong>of</strong> educational and technical content in educational hypermedia.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the most important issues <strong>of</strong> this work was the creation <strong>of</strong> the fine-grained<br />
EHPs <strong>of</strong> teaching and learning strategies within the EHP-layer <strong>of</strong> the framework.<br />
This framework was developed as described in chapter 3. Further on, the EFTECS<br />
formed the basis for the XEML and the HEAT and was designed for further ex-<br />
tensibility in the future. This extensibility allows the introduction <strong>of</strong> new EHPs<br />
and TLSs as long as the basic EHPs, e.g. HELP-EHP, are included.<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the interview evaluation in chapter 6, the practical evaluation in<br />
chapter 7 and the discussion in chapter 8 show that the EFTECS can be success-<br />
fully and effectively used for the separation <strong>of</strong> the educational and the technical<br />
content in educational hypermedia.<br />
However, some specific limitations <strong>of</strong> the framework were discovered especially<br />
during the interview evaluation. For example, the complexity <strong>of</strong> the framework<br />
195