Guenter Hilmer - Phd Thesis - Glamorgan Dspace - University of ...
Guenter Hilmer - Phd Thesis - Glamorgan Dspace - University of ... Guenter Hilmer - Phd Thesis - Glamorgan Dspace - University of ...
5.2 Design of the interview evaluation 5 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY • Creation of a QA-TLS The first task the test candidates were asked to undertake was the creation of a QA-TLS on paper. The creation of the QA-TLS was seen as giving the evaluation participants a first impression of the usage of the 3-Layer-Model. The exact task and the material can be found in the appendices in Appendix A.1 and in Appendix A.2. • Theoretical conversion of the QA-TLS from a Multiple-Choice-QA into a True-or-False-QA Another important issue of this evaluation was to show the participants the possibility of reusability of once authored material in different ways. This reuse was done in the simplest way by using different display styles for a specific TLS. • Creation of another TLS (lecture) The next logical step of testing the framework was to ask the candidates to create a TLS by themselves. Their capability of creating TLSs individually is another important indicator of their understanding the 3-Layer-Model. • Linking the created TLSs together Finally, after authoring and creating new material based on the 3-Layer- Model it was necessary to ask the candidates to link the different TLSs together to form a first EM. After fulfilling the tasks in the manual markup part of the evaluation session the test participants were asked to give the mid-test interview so that information about the test participants’ understanding of the 3-Layer-Model could be gained. Mid-test interview The mid-test interview is fitted into this evaluation to get a structured feedback about the manual markup task from the evaluation candidates. During the mid- test interview the participants were asked the following questions: 136
5.2 Design of the interview evaluation 5 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY • How would you grade the 3-Layer-Model in a sense of complexity? It is important for the evaluation of the test results to know how the test candidates graded the 3-Layer-Model. • What are the advantages or problems of the model? The identification of problems or advantages of the model is important for later improvement of the 3-Layer-Model. • What is your understanding of the tags of the QA-TLS? It would be a good indicator of the quality of the 3-Layer-Model if the test participants have a good understanding of the specific tags of the QA-TLS. • What are the advantages or problems of the QA-tags? It is not only important to know how the participants understood the QA- TLS, but also what they thought about the advantages and problems they discovered during their work on the manual markup task. • What is your understanding of the tags of the Lecture-TLS? Understanding several TLSs of the created framework is another important aspect of this evaluation. • What are the advantages or problems of the Lecture-tags? Similar to the QA-TLS it is important to know the advantages and problems of the Lecture-TLS to have the possibility of improving the framework in the future. • How easy was it for you to tag the QA material? The easier the tagging process is for the test participants, the better the EFTECS works for the educational experts. • How easy was it for you to tag the Lecture material? The easier the tagging process is for the test candidates, the better the opti- misation of the framework is for educational experts. • Do you have any additional comments? The participants were given the chance to express additional thoughts or 137
- Page 85 and 86: 3.4 EFTECS at EHP-Layer 3 EFTECS 3.
- Page 87 and 88: 3.4 EFTECS at EHP-Layer 3 EFTECS 3.
- Page 89 and 90: 3.6 Common meta-information 3 EFTEC
- Page 91 and 92: 3.8 The complete EFTECS 3 EFTECS 3.
- Page 93 and 94: 3.9 The eXtensible Educational Mark
- Page 95 and 96: 4.1 General approach 4 HEAT 4.1.1 T
- Page 97 and 98: 4.1 General approach 4 HEAT the dif
- Page 99 and 100: 4.2 EHP-Layer 4 HEAT 4.2.2 Technica
- Page 101 and 102: 4.3 EHP-Information 4 HEAT 4.3 EHP-
- Page 103 and 104: 4.4 TLS-Layer 4 HEAT 4.4 TLS-Layer
- Page 105 and 106: 4.4 TLS-Layer 4 HEAT Element Type x
- Page 107 and 108: 4.5 EM-Layer 4 HEAT The important f
- Page 109 and 110: 4.6 Content space 4 HEAT It was def
- Page 111 and 112: 4.7 Material delivery 4 HEAT concep
- Page 113 and 114: 4.8 Detailed example 4 HEAT • Add
- Page 115 and 116: 4.8 Detailed example 4 HEAT Figure
- Page 117 and 118: 4.8 Detailed example 4 HEAT Figure
- Page 119 and 120: 4.8 Detailed example 4 HEAT Figure
- Page 121 and 122: 4.8 Detailed example 4 HEAT Figure
- Page 123 and 124: 4.8 Detailed example 4 HEAT Figure
- Page 125 and 126: 4.8 Detailed example 4 HEAT the aut
- Page 127 and 128: 5 Evaluation methodology 5 EVALUATI
- Page 129 and 130: 5.1 Analysis of alternative approac
- Page 131 and 132: 5.2 Design of the interview evaluat
- Page 133 and 134: 5.2 Design of the interview evaluat
- Page 135: 5.2 Design of the interview evaluat
- Page 139 and 140: 5.2 Design of the interview evaluat
- Page 141 and 142: 5.2 Design of the interview evaluat
- Page 143 and 144: 5.3 Design of the practical evaluat
- Page 145 and 146: 6 Interview evaluation 6 INTERVIEW
- Page 147 and 148: 6.1 Analysis of the pre-test interv
- Page 149 and 150: 6.1 Analysis of the pre-test interv
- Page 151 and 152: 6.2 Analysis of the manual markup t
- Page 153 and 154: 6.3 Analysis of the mid-test interv
- Page 155 and 156: 6.3 Analysis of the mid-test interv
- Page 157 and 158: 6.4 Analysis of the HEAT based mark
- Page 159 and 160: 6.4 Analysis of the HEAT based mark
- Page 161 and 162: 6.5 Analysis of the post-test inter
- Page 163 and 164: 6.5 Analysis of the post-test inter
- Page 165 and 166: 7 Practical evaluation 7 PRACTICAL
- Page 167 and 168: 7.1 Design 7 PRACTICAL EVALUATION O
- Page 169 and 170: 7.2 Existing material 7 PRACTICAL E
- Page 171 and 172: 7.2 Existing material 7 PRACTICAL E
- Page 173 and 174: 7.3 New material 7 PRACTICAL EVALUA
- Page 175 and 176: 7.3 New material 7 PRACTICAL EVALUA
- Page 177 and 178: 7.4 Summary 7 PRACTICAL EVALUATION
- Page 179 and 180: 7.4 Summary 7 PRACTICAL EVALUATION
- Page 181 and 182: 8 Discussion 8 DISCUSSION The insig
- Page 183 and 184: 8.1 Review of the EFTECS 8 DISCUSSI
- Page 185 and 186: 8.1 Review of the EFTECS 8 DISCUSSI
5.2 Design <strong>of</strong> the interview evaluation 5 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY<br />
• Creation <strong>of</strong> a QA-TLS<br />
The first task the test candidates were asked to undertake was the creation<br />
<strong>of</strong> a QA-TLS on paper. The creation <strong>of</strong> the QA-TLS was seen as giving the<br />
evaluation participants a first impression <strong>of</strong> the usage <strong>of</strong> the 3-Layer-Model.<br />
The exact task and the material can be found in the appendices in Appendix<br />
A.1 and in Appendix A.2.<br />
• Theoretical conversion <strong>of</strong> the QA-TLS from a Multiple-Choice-QA into a<br />
True-or-False-QA<br />
Another important issue <strong>of</strong> this evaluation was to show the participants the<br />
possibility <strong>of</strong> reusability <strong>of</strong> once authored material in different ways. This<br />
reuse was done in the simplest way by using different display styles for a<br />
specific TLS.<br />
• Creation <strong>of</strong> another TLS (lecture)<br />
The next logical step <strong>of</strong> testing the framework was to ask the candidates to<br />
create a TLS by themselves. Their capability <strong>of</strong> creating TLSs individually<br />
is another important indicator <strong>of</strong> their understanding the 3-Layer-Model.<br />
• Linking the created TLSs together<br />
Finally, after authoring and creating new material based on the 3-Layer-<br />
Model it was necessary to ask the candidates to link the different TLSs<br />
together to form a first EM.<br />
After fulfilling the tasks in the manual markup part <strong>of</strong> the evaluation session the<br />
test participants were asked to give the mid-test interview so that information<br />
about the test participants’ understanding <strong>of</strong> the 3-Layer-Model could be gained.<br />
Mid-test interview<br />
The mid-test interview is fitted into this evaluation to get a structured feedback<br />
about the manual markup task from the evaluation candidates. During the mid-<br />
test interview the participants were asked the following questions:<br />
136