23.10.2013 Views

THE EARLY CHRISTIAN SABBATH - Friends of the Sabbath Australia

THE EARLY CHRISTIAN SABBATH - Friends of the Sabbath Australia

THE EARLY CHRISTIAN SABBATH - Friends of the Sabbath Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Early Christian <strong>Sabbath</strong><br />

Fa<strong>the</strong>rs, 2d Series, vol. 12, Page 7.<br />

Their agreement was well illustrated in <strong>the</strong>ir mutual suppression <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sabbath</strong><br />

keeping. It remained for a pope <strong>of</strong> Rome to denounce as anti-Christian those keeping <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Sabbath</strong> commandment <strong>of</strong> God. Gregory 1, named <strong>the</strong> Great, bishop <strong>of</strong> Rome from AD<br />

590 to 604, declared <strong>Sabbath</strong>keepers to be preachers <strong>of</strong> antichrist. He wrote:<br />

“Gregory, bishop by <strong>the</strong> grace <strong>of</strong> God to his well-beloved sons, <strong>the</strong> Roman<br />

citizens: It has come to me that certain men <strong>of</strong> perverse spirit have disseminated among<br />

you things depraved and opposed to <strong>the</strong> holy faith, so that <strong>the</strong>y forbid anything to be<br />

done on <strong>the</strong> day <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sabbath</strong>. What shall I call <strong>the</strong>m except preachers <strong>of</strong> antichrist?” -<br />

Epistles, book 13: 1, in Labbe and Cossart, Sacrosancta Concilia, volume 5, column<br />

1511.<br />

Who was it that suppressed <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sabbath</strong> and emphasized Sunday observance? As<br />

we review <strong>the</strong> evidence, we answer. The Church <strong>of</strong> Rome. It is not surprising <strong>the</strong>refore to<br />

find catechism after catechism <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Roman Catholic Church admitting frankly, indeed<br />

claiming, that to <strong>the</strong> Church <strong>of</strong> Rome must go <strong>the</strong> credit for <strong>the</strong> elimination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> true<br />

<strong>Sabbath</strong> and <strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> Sunday observance. This shift became effective during<br />

<strong>the</strong> fifth and sixth centuries, at <strong>the</strong> very period when <strong>the</strong> popes were consolidating <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

enormous ecclesiastical power.<br />

As <strong>the</strong> centuries rolled by, Sunday observance became increasingly a symbol <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> ecclesiastical power <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Roman Church. It was used by Rome as a challenge to <strong>the</strong><br />

Protestant leaders <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Reformation. Eck, <strong>the</strong> noted Catholic debater against Lu<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

had in <strong>the</strong> Leipzig disputation <strong>of</strong> 1519 forced <strong>the</strong> Protestant leader to concur in <strong>the</strong><br />

“heresies” <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> great Bohemian reformer, Huss, who had been burned at <strong>the</strong> stake in<br />

1415. In 1533, writing fur<strong>the</strong>r against Lu<strong>the</strong>r, Eck used Sunday observance as an<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> authority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Roman Church in matters <strong>of</strong> faith and religious practice.<br />

He wrote:<br />

“The Scripture teaches: Remember that you sanctify <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sabbath</strong> day; you will<br />

labor six days, and do all your work, but on <strong>the</strong> seventh day is <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sabbath</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord<br />

your God, etc., etc. Never<strong>the</strong>less <strong>the</strong> church has changed <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sabbath</strong> to <strong>the</strong> Lord's day by<br />

its own authority, concerning which you have no Scripture.” John Eck, Enchiridion<br />

Locorum Communium adversus Lu<strong>the</strong>ranos (Handbook <strong>of</strong> Commonplaces Against <strong>the</strong><br />

Lu<strong>the</strong>rans), printing <strong>of</strong> 1533, pages 4a, 5. (Translation by <strong>the</strong> author.)<br />

But <strong>the</strong> full force <strong>of</strong> this Catholic claim is clearly seen in <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> Trent<br />

itself. On Sunday, January 18, 1562, Which opened <strong>the</strong> last session <strong>of</strong> that important<br />

council, <strong>the</strong> archbishop <strong>of</strong> Reggia, Caspar del Fossa, delivered a sermon in which he<br />

based <strong>the</strong> whole structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> authority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Catholic Church upon <strong>the</strong> fact that “<strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Sabbath</strong>, <strong>the</strong> most glorious day in <strong>the</strong> law, has been changed into <strong>the</strong> Lord's day.” - Labbe<br />

and Cossart, Sacrosancta Concilia, volume 14, columns 1253, 1254.<br />

Commenting upon this, Heinrich julius Holtzmann, German scholar and<br />

outstanding authority on <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> ecclesiastical tradition, says <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> significance<br />

<strong>of</strong> Del Fossa's position:<br />

“At last at <strong>the</strong> final opening [<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> council] on January 18, 1562, <strong>the</strong>y rid<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>of</strong> all hesitation; <strong>the</strong> archbishop <strong>of</strong> Reggia made an address in which he<br />

declared openly that tradition was elevated above <strong>the</strong> Scripture. On this account <strong>the</strong><br />

authority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Church could not at all [<strong>the</strong> archbishop maintained] be tied to <strong>the</strong><br />

authority <strong>of</strong> Scripture, because <strong>the</strong> former had, not according to <strong>the</strong> ordinance <strong>of</strong> Christ,<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!