22.10.2013 Views

Section 2 - FTSE

Section 2 - FTSE

Section 2 - FTSE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AIG’S BLANK<br />

CHEQUE<br />

What price saving a company from collapse? Like<br />

other insurers, insurance giant American<br />

International Group (AIG) has been thumped by<br />

the severe downturn in the credit markets as fears<br />

that the gamut of complex, structured<br />

investments it insures will default. A 24 month<br />

$85bn line of credit proved insufficient, an<br />

additional $40bn did not help much, either.<br />

However, with its latest relief package—more<br />

flexible terms, more payoff time, and, yes, even<br />

more money—the government believes it has<br />

finally found the formula that will allow AIG the<br />

most realistic chance of recovering from its<br />

ruinous credit-related investment activities. Third<br />

time lucky? David Simons reports from Boston.<br />

THEY KNEW THE risks, watched as losses piled up,<br />

but told auditors almost nothing. In an era of<br />

increasingly tough oversight standards, they<br />

routinely avoided regulatory independence and put the<br />

kibosh on finger-pointing insiders. When the house of<br />

cards finally fell last September, AIG—at one time the<br />

single largest insurance entity in the world with<br />

facilities in more than 130 countries—found itself<br />

at the doorstep of the federal government, hat in<br />

hand. The powers that be sized up the<br />

situation, pronounced AIG “too big to fail,”<br />

and proffered a generous credit line of<br />

$85bn, but it was not enough.<br />

By November 2008 the largest bailout<br />

of a non-banking firm in the history of<br />

the United States had swelled to over<br />

$150bn, and included more favourable<br />

terms than the initial package offered.<br />

Not even that chunk of change could<br />

guarantee a surefire recovery as long as<br />

the company continued to go into the<br />

hole in order to cover its toxic portfolio<br />

of complex credit investments. These<br />

included the super-senior tranches of<br />

collateralised debt obligations (CDOs)<br />

accumulated by AIG’s Financial<br />

Products Corp subsidiary.<br />

Photograph © Robert Mizerek/Dreamstime.com, supplied December 2008.<br />

F T S E G L O B A L M A R K E T S • J A N U A R Y / F E B R U A R Y 2 0 0 9<br />

By the end of November the company finally issued some<br />

good news: some $53.5bn in mortgage debt obligations<br />

would be cleared from AIG’s books, part of an agreement<br />

with the federal government to purchase upwards $70bn<br />

worth of toxic credit-based assets. AIG would continue to<br />

be liable for assets not yet obtained, however.<br />

The government contends that its course of action has<br />

more to do with preventing the carnage from spreading<br />

throughout the entire global financial community, rather<br />

than sparing AIG itself. Even so, it is a tremendous gamble,<br />

one with potentially enormous consequences. Should AIG<br />

recover and its stock price rally, the government would turn<br />

CORPORATE PROFILE: AIG<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!