22.10.2013 Views

cross section crash boxes

cross section crash boxes

cross section crash boxes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

oxes are shown in Figure 4.6. The larger <strong>boxes</strong> with the dimensions of<br />

70.6x73.2x125.2 mm are coded as G1 and smaller 60x70.4x122.6 mm size <strong>boxes</strong> as G2<br />

throughout this thesis. In both geometries of the <strong>crash</strong> <strong>boxes</strong>, trigger mechanisms were<br />

made on the outer surfaces. The trigger mechanisms function to reduce the initial peak<br />

load level and induce a more uniform deformation load. In the filled box, the trigger<br />

mechanisms also allow to position the aluminum foam filler in the mid-<strong>section</strong> of the<br />

box, between the upper and lower triggers on the outer surface. Special apparatus were<br />

constructed to form the trigger mechanisms on the surface of the <strong>crash</strong> box samples.<br />

The box was first fixed on the table of the hydraulic pres and then a steel shaping roller<br />

was slid over the parallel surface of the <strong>crash</strong> box as shown in Figure 4.7. This formed a<br />

relatively thin deformed <strong>section</strong> where the folding first triggers upon loading. The<br />

trigger mechanisms were positioned at a distance of 35 mm from the top and the bottom<br />

of the <strong>crash</strong> box. After initial experimentation of the various configurations of triggers,<br />

it was decided to place 4 trigger mechanisms on the box, two of them on one surface<br />

and the other two on the opposite surface. The trigger configuration selected was found<br />

to result in a folding mechanism progressing through the filled <strong>section</strong>s, not through the<br />

compression test plates. Al foam filler <strong>section</strong> was 60 mm thick, which was<br />

approximately half of the length of the <strong>crash</strong> box. The weight of each filler was<br />

measured before filling the <strong>boxes</strong>.<br />

Two groups of experimental <strong>crash</strong> <strong>boxes</strong> were prepared for the compression<br />

testing. In the first group <strong>boxes</strong>, the tests were performed without montage parts. For<br />

this, the montage part of the <strong>crash</strong> <strong>boxes</strong> was removed simply by cutting the montage<br />

parts (Figure 4.8(a)). In the second group, the <strong>boxes</strong> were tested with the montage<br />

plates. In this group of samples, corrugated <strong>section</strong>s, two rectangular holes of 12x12<br />

mm in size, on each surface of the <strong>boxes</strong> were created at the upper <strong>section</strong> of the box as<br />

seen in Figure 4.8(a). Few <strong>crash</strong> <strong>boxes</strong> were tested with montage parts without<br />

corrugated <strong>section</strong>s in order to determine the effect of montage parts on the <strong>crash</strong>ing<br />

behavior. The thicknesses of the <strong>boxes</strong> tested were 2, 2.5 and 3 mm (Figure 4.8 (c)).<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!