cross section crash boxes
cross section crash boxes
cross section crash boxes
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
oxes are shown in Figure 4.6. The larger <strong>boxes</strong> with the dimensions of<br />
70.6x73.2x125.2 mm are coded as G1 and smaller 60x70.4x122.6 mm size <strong>boxes</strong> as G2<br />
throughout this thesis. In both geometries of the <strong>crash</strong> <strong>boxes</strong>, trigger mechanisms were<br />
made on the outer surfaces. The trigger mechanisms function to reduce the initial peak<br />
load level and induce a more uniform deformation load. In the filled box, the trigger<br />
mechanisms also allow to position the aluminum foam filler in the mid-<strong>section</strong> of the<br />
box, between the upper and lower triggers on the outer surface. Special apparatus were<br />
constructed to form the trigger mechanisms on the surface of the <strong>crash</strong> box samples.<br />
The box was first fixed on the table of the hydraulic pres and then a steel shaping roller<br />
was slid over the parallel surface of the <strong>crash</strong> box as shown in Figure 4.7. This formed a<br />
relatively thin deformed <strong>section</strong> where the folding first triggers upon loading. The<br />
trigger mechanisms were positioned at a distance of 35 mm from the top and the bottom<br />
of the <strong>crash</strong> box. After initial experimentation of the various configurations of triggers,<br />
it was decided to place 4 trigger mechanisms on the box, two of them on one surface<br />
and the other two on the opposite surface. The trigger configuration selected was found<br />
to result in a folding mechanism progressing through the filled <strong>section</strong>s, not through the<br />
compression test plates. Al foam filler <strong>section</strong> was 60 mm thick, which was<br />
approximately half of the length of the <strong>crash</strong> box. The weight of each filler was<br />
measured before filling the <strong>boxes</strong>.<br />
Two groups of experimental <strong>crash</strong> <strong>boxes</strong> were prepared for the compression<br />
testing. In the first group <strong>boxes</strong>, the tests were performed without montage parts. For<br />
this, the montage part of the <strong>crash</strong> <strong>boxes</strong> was removed simply by cutting the montage<br />
parts (Figure 4.8(a)). In the second group, the <strong>boxes</strong> were tested with the montage<br />
plates. In this group of samples, corrugated <strong>section</strong>s, two rectangular holes of 12x12<br />
mm in size, on each surface of the <strong>boxes</strong> were created at the upper <strong>section</strong> of the box as<br />
seen in Figure 4.8(a). Few <strong>crash</strong> <strong>boxes</strong> were tested with montage parts without<br />
corrugated <strong>section</strong>s in order to determine the effect of montage parts on the <strong>crash</strong>ing<br />
behavior. The thicknesses of the <strong>boxes</strong> tested were 2, 2.5 and 3 mm (Figure 4.8 (c)).<br />
69