22.10.2013 Views

cross section crash boxes

cross section crash boxes

cross section crash boxes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 3.29. (cont.)<br />

3.5. Motivations<br />

(b)<br />

Foam filling of tubular structures becomes efficient after a critical foam density<br />

and/or plateau stress (Figure 3.17). At low foam plateau stresses the specific energy<br />

absorption of filled tube is below that of empty tube because of the ineffective foam<br />

strength over total weight ratio. Filling with higher foam densities at present is however<br />

limited by an upper density, 0.4 g cm -3 , of the commercially available Al foams. In<br />

addition, the use of high density Al foams will increase the total cost of the <strong>crash</strong> <strong>boxes</strong>.<br />

On the other hand, the use of multi cell tubular structures was shown to improve SEA<br />

values. Similar to the use of the high strength foam filing, the use of the multiple cell<br />

tubular structures will increase the unit cost of the <strong>crash</strong> <strong>boxes</strong>. In partially foam filling<br />

in which the foam filler length is smaller than that of the column, a certain improvement<br />

in SEA was achieved (Altenhof, et al. 2002, Chen and Nardhi 2000, Wang, et al. 2005,<br />

Wood, et al. 2006). The efficiencies of foam filling depend on, besides the density of<br />

the foam filler, the geometry and the base material of the structure and the length of the<br />

foam filler. A complete analysis of the effects of tube wall thickness and base material<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!