22.10.2013 Views

cross section crash boxes

cross section crash boxes

cross section crash boxes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 3.12. Folding in square tubes of ASTM A36, A513, AISI 316 and 304<br />

(Source: DiPaolo and Tom 2006)<br />

Impact energy absorption of extruded 6061 Al tubes with different <strong>cross</strong>-<br />

<strong>section</strong>s were investigated by Dong-Kuk Kim and Sunghak Lee (Kim and Lee 1999).<br />

The tubes with rectangular and circular <strong>cross</strong>-<strong>section</strong> were tested with and without<br />

welded top and bottom plate. SEA values of the impacted tubes of both geometries<br />

increased with increasing thickness to width and thickness to diameter ratios. The<br />

number of symmetric folds tended to increased with increasing thickness to width and<br />

thickness to diameter ratios, in both tube geometries. It was noted that circular<br />

specimens showed higher specific energy absorption than rectangular ones due to higher<br />

tendency of circular tubes for symmetric fold formation. In addition, the edge tip radius<br />

was found to be effective on the deformation load values of rectangular tubes. When the<br />

edge tip radius was very small, compressive load was concentrated on the edges and<br />

caused an early crack opening. The cracks propagated quickly and resulted in<br />

considerably lower values of energy absorption.<br />

Experimental and numerical energy absorption of an axially crushed square<br />

6063T5 tube were determined with a buckling initiator (Figure 3.13(a)) by Zhang et<br />

al.(Zhang, et al. 2009). During the impact test, a striker impinged the pre-hit column<br />

and forced the steel strip to pull the opposite tube walls inwards. The folding initiated<br />

when the striker contacted with the top edges of tube itself. Adopted folding initiator<br />

resulted in 30% reduction in the initial buckling load level without effecting the<br />

subsequent progressive crushing mode (Figure 3.12(b)).<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!