cross section crash boxes

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Miyoshi, T., Itoh, M., Mukai, T., Kanahashi, H., Kohzu, H., Tanabe, S. and Higashi, K., 1999, Enhancement of energy absorption in a closed-cell aluminum by the modification of cellular structures. Scripta Materialia. 41(10): p. 1055-1060. Montgomery, D. C.,1997,Design of Experiments,John Wiley & Sons Inc. Mukai, T., Kanahashi, H., Miyoshi, T., Mabuchi, M., Nieh, T. G. and Higashi, K., 1999, Experimental study of energy absorption in a close-celled aluminum foam under dynamic loading. Scripta Materialia. 40(8): p. 921-927. Mukai, T., Miyoshi, T., Nakano, S., Somekawa, H. and Higashi, K., 2006, Compressive response of a closed-cell aluminum foam at high strain rate. Scripta Materialia. 54(4): p. 533-537. Myers, H. R. and Montgomery, D. C,1995,Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments,John Wiley & Sons Onck, P. R., Andrews, E. W. and Gibson, L. J., 2001, Size effects in ductile cellular solids. Part I: modeling. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 43(3): p. 681-699. Park, C. and Nutt, S. R., 2002, Strain rate sensitivity and defects in steel foam. Materials Science and Engineering A. 323(1-2): p. 358-366. Paul, A. and Ramamurty, U., 2000, Strain rate sensitivity of a closed-cell aluminum foam. Materials Science and Engineering A. 281(1-2): p. 1-7. M. Peden, R. Scurfield, D. Sleet, D. Mohan, A. A. Hyder, E. Jarawan and C. Mathers,2004,World report on road traffic injury prevention, Peroni, L., Avalle, M. and Belingardi, G., 2009, Comparison of the energy absorption capability of crash boxes assembled by spot-weld and continuous joining techniques. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 36(3): p. 498-511. Peroni, L., Avalle, M. and Peroni, M., 2008, The mechanical behaviour of aluminium foam structures in different loading conditions. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 35(7): p. 644-658. Pipkorn, B. and Hayland, Y., 2005, Proposed variable stiffness of vehicle longitudinal frontal members. International Journal of Crashworthiness. 10(6): p. 603- 608. Proa-Flores, P.M. and Drew, R. A. , 2008, Production of Aluminum Foams with Nicoated TiH2 Powder. Advanced Engineering Materials. 10(9): p. 830-834. 204
Pugsley, A. G. and Macaulay, M., 1960, The large scale crumpling of thin cylindrical columns. Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mechanics. 13(1): p. 1-9. Qiao, J. S., Chen, J. H. and Che, H. Y., 2006, Crashworthiness assessment of square aluminum extrusions considering the damage evolution. Thin-Walled Structures. 44(6): p. 692-700. Rajendran, R., Moorthi, A. and Basu, S., 2009a, Numerical simulation of drop weight impact behaviour of closed cell aluminium foam. Materials & Design. 30(8): p. 2823-2830. Rajendran, R., Prem Sai, K., Chandrasekar, B., Gokhale, A. and Basu, S., 2009b, Impact energy absorption of aluminium foam fitted AISI 304L stainless steel tube. Materials & Design. 30(5): p. 1777-1784. Reyes, A., Hopperstad, O. S., Berstad, T., Hanssen, A. G. and Langseth, M., 2003, Constitutive modeling of aluminum foam including fracture and statistical variation of density. European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids. 22(6): p. 815-835. Reyes, A., Hopperstad, O. S., Hanssen, A. G. and Langseth, M., 2004, Modeling of material failure in foam-based components. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 30(7): p. 805-834. Ruan, D., Lu, G., Chen, F. L. and Siores, E., 2002, Compressive behaviour of aluminium foams at low and medium strain rates. Composite Structures. 57(1-4): p. 331-336. Santosa, S. P., Wierzbicki, T., Hanssen, A. G. and Langseth, M., 2000, Experimental and numerical studies of foam-filled sections. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 24(5): p. 509-534. Santosa, S. and Wierzbicki, T., 1998a, Crash behavior of box columns filled with aluminum honeycomb or foam. Computers & Structures. 68(4): p. 343-367. Santosa, S. and Wierzbicki, T., 1998b, On the modeling of crush behavior of a closedcell aluminum foam structure. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 46(4): p. 645-669. Schwingel, D., Seeliger, H-W., Vecchionacci, C., Alwes, D. and Dittrich, J., Aluminium foam sandwich structures for space applications. Acta Astronautica. 61(1- 6): p. 326-330. 205
Page 1 and 2:
OPTIMIZATION OF THE AXIAL CRUSHING
Page 3 and 4:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My PhD quest has b
Page 5 and 6:
ÖZET KAPALI HÜCRELİ ALUMİNYUM K
Page 7 and 8:
CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS ....
Page 9 and 10:
CHAPTER 8 ALUMINUM CRASH BOX OPTIMI
Page 12 and 13:
Figure 3.7. Simulations of the defo
Page 14 and 15:
Figure 4.9. Dimensions of tensile t
Page 16 and 17:
Figure 6.21. Sequential deformation
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
LIST OF TABLES Table Page Table 4.1
Page 22 and 23:
Figure 1. 1. The body in white stru
Page 24 and 25:
Figure 1. 4. Commercial crash boxes
Page 26 and 27:
CHAPTER 2 AL CLOSED CELL FOAMS: PRO
Page 28 and 29:
The processing methods and mechanic
Page 30 and 31:
Figure 2. 5 The preferred particle
Page 32 and 33:
Figure 2. 8. Typical cellular struc
Page 34 and 35:
Figure 2. 10. Manufacturing cost of
Page 36:
Figure 2. 12. Laser assisted foamed
Page 41 and 42:
Figure 2.16. Shear strength, normal
Page 43 and 44:
Figure 2. 19. Yield strength vs. re
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 2. 21. Unit cell geometry an
Page 47 and 48:
Figure 2. 24. Load-displacement cur
Page 49 and 50:
Figure 2. 26. The photographs of a
Page 51 and 52:
CHAPTER 3 CRUSHING BEHAVIOR OF TUBU
Page 53 and 54:
Figure 3.2. Diamond deformation mod
Page 57 and 58:
deformation mode transition from ax
Page 59 and 60:
Figure 3.8. Energy absorption of qu
Page 61:
(a) (c) Figure 3.10. Deformation mo
Page 65 and 66:
(a) (b) Figure 3.13. a) Schematic o
Page 67 and 68:
(a) (b) (c) Figure 3.15. a) Load-di
Page 72 and 73:
Figure 3.18. The crush terminology.
Page 75 and 76:
The quasi-static compression behavi
Page 77 and 78:
Figure 3.22. The variation of speci
Page 79 and 80:
Figure 3.24. Deformation modes of e
Page 81 and 82:
Figure 3.27. SEA values of empty an
Page 83 and 84:
Figure 3.29. (cont.) 3.5. Motivatio
Page 85 and 86:
CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS 4.1.
Page 87 and 88:
(a) (b) Figure 4.3.Pictures of a) f
Page 89 and 90:
oxes are shown in Figure 4.6. The l
Page 91 and 92:
Figure 4.7. The method of trigger m
Page 93 and 94:
4.4. Compression Tests of Crash Box
Page 95 and 96:
4.5.2. Uniaxial Compression Testing
Page 97 and 98:
Table 4.1 (Cont.) G1 T3 F2 G1T3F2 3
Page 99 and 100:
Table 4.2 (Cont.) G1 T2.5 WP F2 G1T
Page 101:
CHAPTER 5 SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATI
Page 105:
considered in axial and transverse
Page 109 and 110:
were constrained. Since the width o
Page 116 and 117:
5.4. The Crashworthiness Optimizati
Page 118 and 119:
great effect on the crushing behavi
Page 120:
CHAPTER 6 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 6.1.
Page 124 and 125:
Figure 6.3.Tensile stress-strain cu
Page 126 and 127:
(a) (b) Figure 6.5. Sequential defo
Page 128 and 129:
plate (Figure 6(b)). The trigger is
Page 130 and 131:
(a) (b) Figure 6.9. Deformation seq
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Figure 6.18. (cont.) (c) (a) (b) Fi
Page 140 and 141:
Figure 6.20.(cont.). (b) (c) 6.5.4.
Page 142 and 143:
Figure 6.21.(cont.) (b) (c) 122
Page 144 and 145:
Figure 6.22.(cont.) (c) Figure 6.23
Page 146 and 147:
Figure 6.24.(Cont.) (b) (c) (a) Fig
Page 148 and 149:
Figure 6.26.(cont.) (b) (c) 6.6. Dy
Page 150 and 151:
Figure 6.27. (cont.) (b) (c) 130
Page 152 and 153:
CHAPTER 7 MODELING RESULTS OF FOAM,
Page 154 and 155:
experimental tensile stress-strain
Page 156 and 157:
significant effect of weld seem ope
Page 158 and 159:
Figure 7.7. Deformation photo of fi
Page 160 and 161:
Figure 7.11. Deformation photos of
Page 162 and 163:
(a) (b) (c) Figure 7.14. Load-displ
Page 164 and 165:
7.4. Simulation of Empty and Partia
Page 166 and 167:
Figure 7.16. (cont.) (c) (a) Figure
Page 168 and 169:
(a) (b) Figure 7.18. Sequential def
Page 170 and 171:
Figure 7.19. (cont.) (b) (c) 150
Page 172 and 173:
Figure 7.20. (cont.) (c) (a) Figure
Page 174 and 175: (a) (b) (c) Figure 7.22. Load-displ
Page 176 and 177: (a) (b) (c) Figure 7.24. Load-displ
Page 178: (a) (b) Figure 7.26. Experimental a
Page 182 and 183: The constructed response surface of
Page 184: Table 8.1. R 2 , Radj 2 and RMSE va
Page 187 and 188: (a) (b) Figure 8.7. Response surfac
Page 189 and 190: an empty tube wall thickness higher
Page 192 and 193: where, K is a dimensionless constan
Page 194 and 195: The dynamic simulation and analytic
Page 196: Figure 9.4. (cont.) (c) (d) Figure
Page 199 and 200: Figure 9.6. (cont.) (c) (d) (a) Fig
Page 203 and 204: Equation 9.7 can also be rewritten
Page 206: (a) (b) Figure 9.10. Energy-absorbi
Page 209 and 210: Figure 9.11. (cont.) (d) The variat
Page 211 and 212: foam filling were evaluated. The re
Page 213 and 214: 13. The interaction between foam fi
Page 215 and 216: Arora, J. S.,2004,Introduction to O
Page 217 and 218: Dannemann, K. A. and Lankford, J.,
Page 219 and 220: Hall, I. W., Guden, M. and Yu, C. J
Page 221 and 222: Kim, D-K. and Lee, S., 1999, Impact
Page 223: Mamalis, A. G., Manolakos, D. E., I
Page 227 and 228: T. Miyoshi, M. Itoh S. Akiyama A. K
Page 229: Zhao, H., Elnasri, I. and Girard, Y
show all

cross section crash boxes

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?