cross section crash boxes

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Bonaccorsi, L. and Proverbio, E., 2006, Powder compaction effect on foaming behavior of uniaxial pressed PM precursors. Advanced Engineering Materials. 8(9): p. 864-869. Borvik, T., Hopperstad, O. S., Reyes, A., Langseth, M., Solomos, G. and Dyngeland, T., 2003, Empty and foam-filled circular aluminium tubes subjected to axial and oblique quasistatic loading. International Journal of Crashworthiness. 8(5): p. 481-494. Campana, Francesca and Pilone, Daniela, 2008, Effect of wall microstructure and morphometric parameters on the crush behaviour of Al alloy foams. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 479(1-2): p. 58-64. Chen, W. and Nardhi, D., 2000, Experimental study of crush behaviour of sheet aluminium foam-filled <strong>section</strong>s. International Journal of Crashworthiness. 5(4): p. 447-468. Chen, W. and Wierzbicki, T., 2001, Relative merits of single-cell, multi-cell and foamfilled thin-walled structures in energy absorption. Thin-Walled Structures. 39(4): p. 287-306. Chiandussi, G. and Avalle, M., 2002, Maximisation of the crushing performance of a tubular device by shape optimisation. Computers & Structures. 80(27-30): p. 2425-2432. Chirwa, E. C., Latchford, J. and Clavell, P., 2003, Carbon skinned aluminium foam nose cones for high performance circuit vehicles. International Journal of Crashworthiness. 8(1): p. 107-114. Cho, Y-B., Bae, C-H., Suh, M-W. and Sin, H-C., 2006, A vehicle front frame <strong>crash</strong> design optimization using hole-type and dent-type crush initiator. Thin- Walled Structures. 44(4): p. 415-428. Crisfield, M. A.,1991,Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures,John Wiley & Sons Czekanski, A., Attia, M. S., Meguid, S. A. and Elbestawi, M. A., 2005a, On the use of a new cell to model geometric asymmetry of metallic foams. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design. 41(13): p. 1327-1340. Czekanski, A., Elbestawi, M. and Meguid, S., 2005b, On the FE Modeling of Closedcell Aluminum Foam. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design. 2(1): p. 23-34. 196
Dannemann, K. A. and Lankford, J., 2000, High strain rate compression of closed-cell aluminium foams. Materials Science and Engineering A. 293(1-2): p. 157- 164. Degischer, H., Kriszt, B.,2002,Handbook of Cellular Metals, Production, Processing, Applications,Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH Deqing, W. and Chengxin, S., 2008, Simulation of aluminum foam formation and distribution uniformity. Journal of Materials Science. 43(8): p. 2825-2832. Deqing, W., Weiwei, X., Xiangjun, M. and Ziyuan, S., 2005, Cell structure and compressive behavior of an aluminum foam. Journal of Materials Science. 40(13): p. 3475-3480. Deshpande, V. S. and Fleck, N. A., 2000a, High strain rate compressive behaviour of aluminium alloy foams. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 24(3): p. 277-298. Deshpande, V. S. and Fleck, N. A., 2000b, Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 48(6-7): p. 1253- 1283. DiPaolo, B. P., Monteiro, P. J. M. and Gronsky, R., 2004, Quasi-static axial crush response of a thin-wall, stainless steel box component. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 41(14): p. 3707-3733. DiPaolo, B. P. and Tom, J. G., 2006, A study on an axial crush configuration response of thin-wall, steel box components: The quasi-static experiments. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 43(25-26): p. 7752-7775. Duwe, J and Kopp, G,2009,SuperLIGHT-CAR: lightly towards the car of the future,http://www.dlr.de/en/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-12/114_read-18596/, (accesed November 2009) EAA, European Aluminum Association, 2008, Aluminum in cars, http://www.eaa.net/upl/4/en/doc/Aluminium_in_cars_Sept2008.pdf, (accesed November 2009) EC ,European Commission 1998, Directive 98/69/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 relating to measures to be taken against air pollution by emissions from motor vehicles and amending Council Directive,70/220/EEC,http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/transport/road.ht m, (accesed November 2009) 197
Page 1 and 2:
OPTIMIZATION OF THE AXIAL CRUSHING
Page 3 and 4:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My PhD quest has b
Page 5 and 6:
ÖZET KAPALI HÜCRELİ ALUMİNYUM K
Page 7 and 8:
CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS ....
Page 9 and 10:
CHAPTER 8 ALUMINUM CRASH BOX OPTIMI
Page 12 and 13:
Figure 3.7. Simulations of the defo
Page 14 and 15:
Figure 4.9. Dimensions of tensile t
Page 16 and 17:
Figure 6.21. Sequential deformation
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
LIST OF TABLES Table Page Table 4.1
Page 22 and 23:
Figure 1. 1. The body in white stru
Page 24 and 25:
Figure 1. 4. Commercial crash boxes
Page 26 and 27:
CHAPTER 2 AL CLOSED CELL FOAMS: PRO
Page 28 and 29:
The processing methods and mechanic
Page 30 and 31:
Figure 2. 5 The preferred particle
Page 32 and 33:
Figure 2. 8. Typical cellular struc
Page 34 and 35:
Figure 2. 10. Manufacturing cost of
Page 36:
Figure 2. 12. Laser assisted foamed
Page 41 and 42:
Figure 2.16. Shear strength, normal
Page 43 and 44:
Figure 2. 19. Yield strength vs. re
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 2. 21. Unit cell geometry an
Page 47 and 48:
Figure 2. 24. Load-displacement cur
Page 49 and 50:
Figure 2. 26. The photographs of a
Page 51 and 52:
CHAPTER 3 CRUSHING BEHAVIOR OF TUBU
Page 53 and 54:
Figure 3.2. Diamond deformation mod
Page 57 and 58:
deformation mode transition from ax
Page 59 and 60:
Figure 3.8. Energy absorption of qu
Page 61:
(a) (c) Figure 3.10. Deformation mo
Page 65 and 66:
(a) (b) Figure 3.13. a) Schematic o
Page 67 and 68:
(a) (b) (c) Figure 3.15. a) Load-di
Page 72 and 73:
Figure 3.18. The crush terminology.
Page 75 and 76:
The quasi-static compression behavi
Page 77 and 78:
Figure 3.22. The variation of speci
Page 79 and 80:
Figure 3.24. Deformation modes of e
Page 81 and 82:
Figure 3.27. SEA values of empty an
Page 83 and 84:
Figure 3.29. (cont.) 3.5. Motivatio
Page 85 and 86:
CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS 4.1.
Page 87 and 88:
(a) (b) Figure 4.3.Pictures of a) f
Page 89 and 90:
oxes are shown in Figure 4.6. The l
Page 91 and 92:
Figure 4.7. The method of trigger m
Page 93 and 94:
4.4. Compression Tests of Crash Box
Page 95 and 96:
4.5.2. Uniaxial Compression Testing
Page 97 and 98:
Table 4.1 (Cont.) G1 T3 F2 G1T3F2 3
Page 99 and 100:
Table 4.2 (Cont.) G1 T2.5 WP F2 G1T
Page 101:
CHAPTER 5 SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATI
Page 105:
considered in axial and transverse
Page 109 and 110:
were constrained. Since the width o
Page 116 and 117:
5.4. The Crashworthiness Optimizati
Page 118 and 119:
great effect on the crushing behavi
Page 120:
CHAPTER 6 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 6.1.
Page 124 and 125:
Figure 6.3.Tensile stress-strain cu
Page 126 and 127:
(a) (b) Figure 6.5. Sequential defo
Page 128 and 129:
plate (Figure 6(b)). The trigger is
Page 130 and 131:
(a) (b) Figure 6.9. Deformation seq
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Figure 6.18. (cont.) (c) (a) (b) Fi
Page 140 and 141:
Figure 6.20.(cont.). (b) (c) 6.5.4.
Page 142 and 143:
Figure 6.21.(cont.) (b) (c) 122
Page 144 and 145:
Figure 6.22.(cont.) (c) Figure 6.23
Page 146 and 147:
Figure 6.24.(Cont.) (b) (c) (a) Fig
Page 148 and 149:
Figure 6.26.(cont.) (b) (c) 6.6. Dy
Page 150 and 151:
Figure 6.27. (cont.) (b) (c) 130
Page 152 and 153:
CHAPTER 7 MODELING RESULTS OF FOAM,
Page 154 and 155:
experimental tensile stress-strain
Page 156 and 157:
significant effect of weld seem ope
Page 158 and 159:
Figure 7.7. Deformation photo of fi
Page 160 and 161:
Figure 7.11. Deformation photos of
Page 162 and 163:
(a) (b) (c) Figure 7.14. Load-displ
Page 164 and 165:
7.4. Simulation of Empty and Partia
Page 166 and 167: Figure 7.16. (cont.) (c) (a) Figure
Page 168 and 169: (a) (b) Figure 7.18. Sequential def
Page 170 and 171: Figure 7.19. (cont.) (b) (c) 150
Page 172 and 173: Figure 7.20. (cont.) (c) (a) Figure
Page 174 and 175: (a) (b) (c) Figure 7.22. Load-displ
Page 176 and 177: (a) (b) (c) Figure 7.24. Load-displ
Page 178: (a) (b) Figure 7.26. Experimental a
Page 182 and 183: The constructed response surface of
Page 184: Table 8.1. R 2 , Radj 2 and RMSE va
Page 187 and 188: (a) (b) Figure 8.7. Response surfac
Page 189 and 190: an empty tube wall thickness higher
Page 192 and 193: where, K is a dimensionless constan
Page 194 and 195: The dynamic simulation and analytic
Page 196: Figure 9.4. (cont.) (c) (d) Figure
Page 199 and 200: Figure 9.6. (cont.) (c) (d) (a) Fig
Page 203 and 204: Equation 9.7 can also be rewritten
Page 206: (a) (b) Figure 9.10. Energy-absorbi
Page 209 and 210: Figure 9.11. (cont.) (d) The variat
Page 211 and 212: foam filling were evaluated. The re
Page 213 and 214: 13. The interaction between foam fi
Page 215: Arora, J. S.,2004,Introduction to O
Page 219 and 220: Hall, I. W., Guden, M. and Yu, C. J
Page 221 and 222: Kim, D-K. and Lee, S., 1999, Impact
Page 223 and 224: Mamalis, A. G., Manolakos, D. E., I
Page 225 and 226: Pugsley, A. G. and Macaulay, M., 19
Page 227 and 228: T. Miyoshi, M. Itoh S. Akiyama A. K
Page 229: Zhao, H., Elnasri, I. and Girard, Y
show all

cross section crash boxes

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?