22.10.2013 Views

cross section crash boxes

cross section crash boxes

cross section crash boxes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 6.21. Sequential deformation pictures of empty and foam filled G1<br />

geometry <strong>crash</strong> <strong>boxes</strong>: a) 3 mm thickness, b) 2.5 mm thickness and<br />

c) 2 mm thickness. .................................................................................... 121<br />

Figure 6.22. Sequential deformation pictures of empty and foam filled G2<br />

geometry <strong>crash</strong> <strong>boxes</strong>: a) 3 mm thickness, b) 2.5 mm thickness and<br />

c) 2mm thickness. ..................................................................................... 123<br />

Figure 6.23. Cross-<strong>section</strong> pictures of deformed empty and F1 foam filled 1050<br />

H14 G1 box with montage parts, t=3 mm. .............................................. 124<br />

Figure 6.24. Load-displacement graphs of G1 and G2 empty and filled <strong>crash</strong><br />

<strong>boxes</strong> with a) 3 mm, b) 2.5 mm and c) 2 mm thickness. .......................... 125<br />

Figure 6.25. Mean load-displacement graphs of G1 and G2 empty and filled<br />

<strong>crash</strong> <strong>boxes</strong> with a) 3 mm, b) 2.5 mm and c) 2 mm thickness. ................ 126<br />

Figure 6.26. SEA-displacement graphs of G1 and G2 empty and filled <strong>crash</strong><br />

<strong>boxes</strong> with montage parts a) 3 mm, b) 2.5 mm and c) 2 mm<br />

thickness. .................................................................................................. 127<br />

Figure 6.27. Load-displacement graphs of a) quasi-statically and dynamically<br />

tested empty <strong>crash</strong> box, b) load-displacement graphs of empty tube<br />

after reconstruction and c) load-displacement graphs of filled <strong>crash</strong><br />

box after reconstruction. ........................................................................... 129<br />

Figure.6.28. Deformation pattern of quasi-static and dynamically tested empty<br />

(G1T3WPE) and partially filled (G1T3WPF1) <strong>crash</strong> <strong>boxes</strong>. ................... 131<br />

Figure 7.1. Experimental and simulation compression stress-strain curves of<br />

Alulight Al foam with relative densities of 0.11 and 0.15. ...................... 133<br />

Figure 7.2. Experimental and Mat 26 Honeycomb foam model simulation<br />

compression stress-strain curves of Alulight Al foams at various<br />

relative densities. ...................................................................................... 133<br />

Figure 7.3. The deformation pictures of numerically tensile testes sample and<br />

fractured experimental tensile test sample and (b) experimental and<br />

numerical, Mat 3 and Mat 24, engineering stress–strain curves of<br />

1050 H14 Al. ............................................................................................ 134<br />

Figure 7.4. Sequential deformation photos of empty <strong>crash</strong> box without montage<br />

parts, t=3 mm (G1T3E). ........................................................................... 136<br />

Figure 7.5. Sequential deformation photos of filled <strong>crash</strong> box without montage<br />

parts, t=3 mm (G1T3F1). ......................................................................... 137<br />

xvi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!