22.10.2013 Views

cross section crash boxes

cross section crash boxes

cross section crash boxes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

experimental tensile stress-strain curves are shown together in Figure 7.3(b). Both<br />

models, as seen in Figure 7.3(b), adequately capture the elastic and plastic deformation<br />

regions of the experimental tensile stress-strain curve of 1050 H14 Al base material.<br />

The models cannot however correctly predict the stress values of the base material in<br />

the regions following the ultimate tensile strength, depicted in Figure 7.3(b). A ductile<br />

failure mode with the well known necking phenomenon is seen in the experimentally<br />

tested samples (Figure 7.3(a)). The shear plane cracking observed in experimental<br />

tensile test is however not observed in the simulations with both material models<br />

(Figure 7.3(a)). A similar observation was previously reported in the tensile testing<br />

simulation of a similar Al alloy (Lademo, et al. 2008). The deformation of <strong>crash</strong> <strong>boxes</strong><br />

was however simulated in this thesis using Mat 3 card, as Mat 3 card uses shorter<br />

calculation times than Mat 24 card.<br />

(a)<br />

Figure 7.3. The deformation pictures of numerically tensile testes sample and fractured<br />

experimental tensile test sample and (b) experimental and numerical, Mat 3<br />

and Mat 24, engineering stress–strain curves of 1050 H14 Al.<br />

(cont. on next page)<br />

134

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!