22.10.2013 Views

cross section crash boxes

cross section crash boxes

cross section crash boxes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 4.9. Dimensions of tensile test sample and welded and unwelded tensile<br />

test specimens. ............................................................................................ 72<br />

Figure 4.10. Commercially available <strong>crash</strong> <strong>boxes</strong> of a) aluminum and b) steel. ............ 73<br />

Figure 4.11. Compression testing of <strong>crash</strong> box without trigger mechanism and<br />

montage part. .............................................................................................. 74<br />

Figure 4.12. Original <strong>crash</strong> box compression testing a) without and b) with<br />

corrugation <strong>section</strong>. .................................................................................... 75<br />

Figure 4.13. Compression testing of <strong>crash</strong> box with trigger mechanism. ...................... 76<br />

Figure 4.14. Uniaxial compression testing of empty and partially foam filled<br />

<strong>crash</strong> box with montage plates. .................................................................. 78<br />

Figure 4.15. a) Fractovis Plus drop-weight test system, b) drawing of the<br />

designed test apparatus and c) the pictures of the test sample and the<br />

sample fixture in the drop weight test. ....................................................... 80<br />

Figure 5.1. Elastic-plastic behavior with isotropic and kinematic hardening, l0<br />

and l are initial and final length of the tension specimen,<br />

respectively. ................................................................................................ 82<br />

Figure 5.2. Effective plastic stress-stain curve. ............................................................ 84<br />

Figure 5.3. Schematic of the honeycomb structure and tension, compression<br />

and shear behavior. ..................................................................................... 85<br />

Figure 5.4. The model of a) <strong>crash</strong> box without montage plates and b) <strong>crash</strong> box<br />

with montage plates. ................................................................................... 89<br />

Figure 5.5. Contact algorithms used in <strong>crash</strong> box modeling a) without and b)<br />

with montage plates. ................................................................................... 90<br />

Figure 5.6. The mesh of sampling points of RSM optimization. ................................. 99<br />

Figure 6.1. (a) Compression stress-stain curves and (b) plateau stress vs.<br />

relative density of Al foam and. ............................................................... 101<br />

Figure 6.2. Experimental and foam model stress-strain curves of Alulight<br />

foams. ....................................................................................................... 103<br />

Figure 6.3. Tensile stress-strain curves of 1050H14 Al sheet material. ..................... 104<br />

Figure 6.4. (a) Tensile stress-strain curve of the welded 1050H14 Al and (b) the<br />

picture of a fractured welded Al specimen showing the failure in the<br />

heat affected zone. .................................................................................... 105<br />

Figure 6.5. Sequential deformation pictures of (a) Al <strong>crash</strong> box (Renault) and<br />

(b) steel <strong>crash</strong> box (Honda). ..................................................................... 106<br />

xiv

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!