19.10.2013 Views

Hillsborough County Lessons Learned Presentation

Hillsborough County Lessons Learned Presentation

Hillsborough County Lessons Learned Presentation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Lessons</strong> <strong>Learned</strong>


Communication, Communication, Communication<br />

• Collaborative effort<br />

• Support of all stakeholders<br />

• Teachers, Principals, Supervisors, Students, Parents, Teacher’s<br />

Union, Community<br />

• Transparent Process<br />

• Open two-way dialog<br />

• Multiple methods of distributing and receiving information<br />

• Teachers need to be able to review and verify the students<br />

that count for them and their data multiple times.<br />

Helping students achieve by helping teachers excel


What assessments will be included in the model?<br />

• State testing data mandated.<br />

• Standardized national assessments are readily available.<br />

• When district assessments are used…<br />

– consider the impact on the teacher<br />

• Time to administer vs. quality of the data received<br />

• Is the assessment aligned with the curriculum?<br />

– consider the sample size<br />

• Best practice suggests 10 teachers for a particular course to have<br />

appropriate standard error ranges.<br />

• Consider what will be done with results when the sample size of<br />

teachers is less than 10…less than 3….<br />

– consider the complexity of the assessment<br />

– consider how the data will be recorded and reported<br />

• Item bank/Testing platform<br />

• How will you maintain as much objectivity as possible?<br />

Helping students achieve by helping teachers excel


What assessments will be used for unique<br />

populations?<br />

• How will ESE students be measured?<br />

– We looked at assessments recommended for use with specific populations.<br />

– We are using the Brigance Test of Basic Skills for students in grades KG-2 and<br />

11 & higher and the Battelle and 4 Year Old Standards for PK.<br />

– We also have a district created rubric for assessing life skills in low<br />

prevalence populations.<br />

• How will electives like performing arts be measured?<br />

– Our first round included performance items.<br />

– We moved to written exams based on the content knowledge taught in these<br />

courses.<br />

– We are testing specials on-line at the elementary level.<br />

• Group administration<br />

• Art pictures embedded<br />

• Music recordings<br />

• Paper and pencil option<br />

• What about courses where a teacher has multiple levels in the same section?<br />

• How will the data be captured?<br />

Helping students achieve by helping teachers excel


If district assessments will be used, what measures<br />

will ensure their validity and reliability?<br />

• Content validity<br />

• Test security<br />

• Item bank/testing platform<br />

– Monitor real time data, rescore, rescan, remove zeros<br />

– Conduct an item analysis each time an assessment is administered<br />

– Revise exams if the point biserial and p value indicate a change is needed<br />

• Minimize the use of stand alone pre-tests<br />

– Prior year achievement for Reading and Math<br />

• FCAT, Stanford, PSAT …….<br />

– District semester exam/end of year test from prior year<br />

• Importance to student – exam exemptions<br />

• Large item bank so that multiple versions of the exam can be developed<br />

• District staff dedicated to building exams and better assessments<br />

— Collaborate with curriculum supervisors and teachers<br />

Helping students achieve by helping teachers excel


Revised items are<br />

stored for current or<br />

later use.<br />

Good items are kept<br />

&<br />

Poor items are<br />

revised or deleted<br />

Test Blueprint created by<br />

curriculum supervisors<br />

and teacher leaders* to<br />

include standards and<br />

number of items tested<br />

Developing<br />

and Revising<br />

Assessment<br />

Items or whole test<br />

is field tested<br />

during the year<br />

*Teacher leaders are recommended and approved in conjunction with CTA.<br />

Curriculum<br />

supervisor and<br />

teacher leaders<br />

write and/or select<br />

items and prepare<br />

assessment for field<br />

testing<br />

Assessment is<br />

transferred to<br />

online portal<br />

(Achievement<br />

Series)


How will common exams be created and the autonomy<br />

for teacher decision making be maintained?<br />

• In most courses a common semester exam would be expected and the<br />

norm.<br />

• In cases where no prior exam existed, we created exams for the courses.<br />

– We created ROTC exams.<br />

• In other cases, the design of the course called for flexibility in pacing and<br />

autonomous decision making by the teacher.<br />

– We worked with IB teachers in order to find some common ground.<br />

• In some courses a common exam was easily agreed upon.<br />

• In some courses where pacing was varied, we agreed upon a common set of<br />

questions per topic administered by all in the course of the year.<br />

Helping students achieve by helping teachers excel


How can multiple response formats be<br />

incorporated?<br />

• The majority of exams are multiple choice and scanned into our<br />

Achievement Series database.<br />

• Some assessments are open response (Writing).<br />

– Common scoring rubric<br />

– Scorers trained and calibrated yearly on the rubric<br />

– Teachers do not score the papers of their own students<br />

• Some assessments will be gridded response.<br />

– One example is IB Math Analysis<br />

• Teacher had an excellent open response exam.<br />

• In order to be as objective as possible, exam utilizes a gridded response that can<br />

be evaluated off site.<br />

Helping students achieve by helping teachers excel


• Process<br />

Test Development<br />

• Curriculum supervisors select teachers to work on each test – the<br />

number of teachers varies based on the overall student enrollment.<br />

• The content supervisors are responsible for content validity.<br />

• The assessment department is responsible for item quality and overall<br />

test quality.<br />

• Current course teachers develop a test blueprint based on the course<br />

objectives and teacher consensus.<br />

• The weight of objectives or content on the test is based on the time<br />

that content is addressed in the curriculum. This serves as a proxy for<br />

importance.<br />

• The blueprint includes content and Webb’s cognitive complexity.<br />

• We try to focus on the culminating skills for each semester.


Test Development<br />

• Teacher training in item writing<br />

• We generally require the teachers to submit items for review as part of<br />

the training process.<br />

• Frequently teachers who are excellent in instructional delivery are not<br />

necessarily good at item creation.<br />

• Challenges<br />

• Reliable Platform with authoring capabilities<br />

• Method of scoring – timelines<br />

• Administering and scanning correctly/<br />

• Support staff in place during testing<br />

• Tech support<br />

• Maintaining test security<br />

• Printing costs<br />

• Writing items that measure higher levels of cognitive skills<br />

• Endless process<br />

Helping students achieve by helping teachers excel


Helping students achieve by helping teachers excel<br />

When students succeed, we all win.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!