FY 2008 Annual Report of Achievements - Gallaudet University
FY 2008 Annual Report of Achievements - Gallaudet University FY 2008 Annual Report of Achievements - Gallaudet University
Gallaudet administration and staff, (d) external researchers, (e) doctoral students, and (f) state and national legislators and businesses. FY 2007-2008 product(s): Gallaudet Research Institute. (2007, December). Regional and national summary report of data from the 2006-2007 Annual Survey of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children and Youth. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University. Electronic version available at: http://gri.gallaudet.edu/Demographics/2006_National_Summary.pdf. Gallaudet Research Institute. (2007, December). State summary report of data from the 2006-2007 Annual Survey of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children and Youth. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University. Electronic version available at: http://gri.gallaudet.edu/Demographics/States/2006.pdf. Auditory Self-Monitoring Status: Ongoing Begin date: October 2003 End date: No set date Principal Investigator(s): Barac-Cikoja, Dragana – Gallaudet Research Institute A-40 Other Investigator(s): Cole, Kevin – Gallaudet Research Institute Description: A novel approach to investigate self-hearing has been developed. It is based on traditional psychophysical techniques and focuses on the individuals’ sensitivity to variations in different acoustic properties of their speech feedback (e.g., timing, intensity). To date, tests of feedback delay detection and relative loudness of self-generated speech have been fully automated and applied to investigate the effect of different listening conditions on self-hearing by individuals with different hearing abilities. In addition, a new line of research has been developed that focuses on the acoustic characteristics of the speech signal recorded both in the person’s ear canal and at different points on his/her head, for live versus recorded speech, in either open or occluded ear. It is expected that the outcomes of this research program will include both increased understanding of the role that speech feedback plays in speech production and design guidelines for hearing assistive technology that can better serve self-hearing needs of hard of hearing individuals. Funding source: RERC on Hearing Enhancement FY 2007-2008 product(s): Barac-Cikoja, D., Reyes, J., & Sonnemann, S. (2008, August). Psychophysical approach to investigating relative loudness of selfgenerated speech. Poster presentation at the International Hearing Aid Research Conference, Lake Tahoe, CA.
Comparison of Lexical Versus Morphological Grouping of Graphemes in Learning New Words Status: Ongoing Begin date: March 2007 End date: No set date Principal Investigator(s): Barac-Cikoja, Dragana – Gallaudet Research Institute Kelly, Leonard – Gallaudet Research Institute Other Investigator(s): Qi, Sen – Gallaudet Research Institute Cole, Kevin – Gallaudet Research Institute Klein, Leslie (student) – Psychology Murphy, Leah (student) – Psychology Brownfield, Adam (student) – Psychology Description: This project examines a method of teaching words to deaf readers by dividing target words into meaningful parts (morphemes) that pertain to well-known ASL signs. Such a presentation of meaningful word segments contrasts with the usual method that many deaf readers use to learn new words, namely, by memorizing either whole letter strings or one or more graphical features that they consider salient. The proposed method may prove beneficial to deaf readers because it promises to foster the effective decoding of the meaning of newly encountered words by emphasizing their morphological composition. It may allow deaf readers to partly sidestep the memory challenges of learning words as entire unanalyzed units. Once well learned, a morpheme-based strategy could be applied to decode the meanings of the many thousands of words composed of these meaningful word parts. In addition, the initial analytical processing of words into their morphemes may allow readers to develop more structured representations of the words that would lead to more efficient activation of their meanings when encountered in the future. The proposed study will test the efficacy of an approach that presents words segmented according to their constituent morphemes by comparing it to the more commonplace approach of presenting words as whole units or presenting them separated into syllables (i.e., phonology based grouping). Development is complete on screening measures and procedures, training materials and procedures, and outcome measures. All of the latter are automated. Data collection will begin soon. Funding source: GRI Priority Fund, NSF (VL2) FY 2007-2008 product(s): Kelly, L., & Barac-Cikoja, D. (2008, February). Elements of skill crucial for deaf readers: What we know, what we don’t know, and promise (not promises) for the future. Presentation at the Visual Language and Learning (VL2) Series, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC. A-41
- Page 140 and 141: Table 51. Percentage of MSSD Studen
- Page 142 and 143: 134 Table 53. Percentage of MSSD St
- Page 144 and 145: MSSD Student Outcomes Student readi
- Page 146 and 147: Reading achievement of graduates. A
- Page 148 and 149: Table 59. Percentage of MSSD Gradua
- Page 150 and 151: 142 Division of Administration and
- Page 153 and 154: Table of Contents UNIVERSITY RESEAR
- Page 155 and 156: AN AUTOMATIC FITTING ALGORITHM FOR
- Page 157 and 158: DRINKING AMONG DEAF AND HARD OF HEA
- Page 159 and 160: University Research Projects The Hi
- Page 161 and 162: Arnos, K.S. (2008, March). Genetics
- Page 163 and 164: Research Stipends to Support Senior
- Page 165 and 166: Chemistry and Physics District of C
- Page 167 and 168: time (new documentation/updated pro
- Page 169 and 170: Communication Studies Families Who
- Page 171 and 172: Strauss, K.P., & Harkins, J. (2007,
- Page 173 and 174: achieved; three of the children als
- Page 175 and 176: The central focus of the ongoing an
- Page 177 and 178: Mertens, D.M. (2008, July). Transfo
- Page 179 and 180: ICARE Schools: A Research Study of
- Page 181 and 182: FY 2007-2008 product(s): Gerner de
- Page 183 and 184: It Takes a Village Status: Ongoing
- Page 185 and 186: Empowering Deaf Communities in Lati
- Page 187 and 188: investigating issues that affect th
- Page 189: Gallaudet Research Institute Americ
- Page 193 and 194: Texas State Survey of Deaf and Hard
- Page 195 and 196: French Primary School Moral and Civ
- Page 197 and 198: Graduate School and Professional Pr
- Page 199 and 200: Dudis, P. (2007, November). Analyzi
- Page 201 and 202: Hearing, Speech, and Language Scien
- Page 203 and 204: The successful completion of this r
- Page 205 and 206: The Effectiveness of Cochlear Hydro
- Page 207 and 208: Interference in Hearing Aids From D
- Page 209 and 210: Bakke, M., Bernstein, C., Bally, S.
- Page 211 and 212: Overall, none of the participants i
- Page 213 and 214: Types of Communication Used by Prof
- Page 215 and 216: Cued Language Structure Status: Ong
- Page 217 and 218: Gender Preference and Interpreting
- Page 219 and 220: Theatrical Team Interpreting: Two P
- Page 221 and 222: A Basic Grammar of Croatian Sign La
- Page 223 and 224: mono- and bilingual signers allows
- Page 225 and 226: three research transcripts. This pr
- Page 227 and 228: Signing With an Accent: ASL L2 Phon
- Page 229 and 230: During the 2007-2008 academic year,
- Page 231 and 232: likely to be classified as secure o
- Page 233 and 234: that were characterized most as Sch
- Page 235 and 236: Hearing Parents of Deaf Children: T
- Page 237 and 238: Language and Gesture in Cross-Lingu
- Page 239 and 240: used a convenience sample of deaf a
Comparison <strong>of</strong> Lexical Versus Morphological Grouping <strong>of</strong> Graphemes in<br />
Learning New Words<br />
Status: Ongoing Begin date: March 2007 End date: No set date<br />
Principal Investigator(s):<br />
Barac-Cikoja, Dragana – <strong>Gallaudet</strong> Research<br />
Institute<br />
Kelly, Leonard – <strong>Gallaudet</strong> Research Institute<br />
Other Investigator(s):<br />
Qi, Sen – <strong>Gallaudet</strong> Research Institute<br />
Cole, Kevin – <strong>Gallaudet</strong> Research Institute<br />
Klein, Leslie (student) – Psychology<br />
Murphy, Leah (student) – Psychology<br />
Brownfield, Adam (student) – Psychology<br />
Description:<br />
This project examines a method <strong>of</strong> teaching words to deaf readers by dividing target words<br />
into meaningful parts (morphemes) that pertain to well-known ASL signs. Such a presentation <strong>of</strong><br />
meaningful word segments contrasts with the usual method that many deaf readers use to learn new<br />
words, namely, by memorizing either whole letter strings or one or more graphical features that they<br />
consider salient. The proposed method may prove beneficial to deaf readers because it promises to<br />
foster the effective decoding <strong>of</strong> the meaning <strong>of</strong> newly encountered words by emphasizing their<br />
morphological composition. It may allow deaf readers to partly sidestep the memory challenges <strong>of</strong><br />
learning words as entire unanalyzed units. Once well learned, a morpheme-based strategy could be<br />
applied to decode the meanings <strong>of</strong> the many thousands <strong>of</strong> words composed <strong>of</strong> these meaningful<br />
word parts. In addition, the initial analytical processing <strong>of</strong> words into their morphemes may allow<br />
readers to develop more structured representations <strong>of</strong> the words that would lead to more efficient<br />
activation <strong>of</strong> their meanings when encountered in the future.<br />
The proposed study will test the efficacy <strong>of</strong> an approach that presents words segmented<br />
according to their constituent morphemes by comparing it to the more commonplace approach <strong>of</strong><br />
presenting words as whole units or presenting them separated into syllables (i.e., phonology based<br />
grouping). Development is complete on screening measures and procedures, training materials and<br />
procedures, and outcome measures. All <strong>of</strong> the latter are automated. Data collection will begin soon.<br />
Funding source: GRI Priority Fund, NSF (VL2)<br />
<strong>FY</strong> 2007-<strong>2008</strong> product(s):<br />
Kelly, L., & Barac-Cikoja, D. (<strong>2008</strong>, February). Elements <strong>of</strong> skill crucial for deaf readers: What we know, what we don’t know, and<br />
promise (not promises) for the future. Presentation at the Visual Language and Learning (VL2) Series, <strong>Gallaudet</strong><br />
<strong>University</strong>, Washington, DC.<br />
A-41