FY 2008 Annual Report of Achievements - Gallaudet University

FY 2008 Annual Report of Achievements - Gallaudet University FY 2008 Annual Report of Achievements - Gallaudet University

gallaudet.edu
from gallaudet.edu More from this publisher
19.10.2013 Views

Gallaudet administration and staff, (d) external researchers, (e) doctoral students, and (f) state and national legislators and businesses. FY 2007-2008 product(s): Gallaudet Research Institute. (2007, December). Regional and national summary report of data from the 2006-2007 Annual Survey of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children and Youth. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University. Electronic version available at: http://gri.gallaudet.edu/Demographics/2006_National_Summary.pdf. Gallaudet Research Institute. (2007, December). State summary report of data from the 2006-2007 Annual Survey of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children and Youth. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University. Electronic version available at: http://gri.gallaudet.edu/Demographics/States/2006.pdf. Auditory Self-Monitoring Status: Ongoing Begin date: October 2003 End date: No set date Principal Investigator(s): Barac-Cikoja, Dragana – Gallaudet Research Institute A-40 Other Investigator(s): Cole, Kevin – Gallaudet Research Institute Description: A novel approach to investigate self-hearing has been developed. It is based on traditional psychophysical techniques and focuses on the individuals’ sensitivity to variations in different acoustic properties of their speech feedback (e.g., timing, intensity). To date, tests of feedback delay detection and relative loudness of self-generated speech have been fully automated and applied to investigate the effect of different listening conditions on self-hearing by individuals with different hearing abilities. In addition, a new line of research has been developed that focuses on the acoustic characteristics of the speech signal recorded both in the person’s ear canal and at different points on his/her head, for live versus recorded speech, in either open or occluded ear. It is expected that the outcomes of this research program will include both increased understanding of the role that speech feedback plays in speech production and design guidelines for hearing assistive technology that can better serve self-hearing needs of hard of hearing individuals. Funding source: RERC on Hearing Enhancement FY 2007-2008 product(s): Barac-Cikoja, D., Reyes, J., & Sonnemann, S. (2008, August). Psychophysical approach to investigating relative loudness of selfgenerated speech. Poster presentation at the International Hearing Aid Research Conference, Lake Tahoe, CA.

Comparison of Lexical Versus Morphological Grouping of Graphemes in Learning New Words Status: Ongoing Begin date: March 2007 End date: No set date Principal Investigator(s): Barac-Cikoja, Dragana – Gallaudet Research Institute Kelly, Leonard – Gallaudet Research Institute Other Investigator(s): Qi, Sen – Gallaudet Research Institute Cole, Kevin – Gallaudet Research Institute Klein, Leslie (student) – Psychology Murphy, Leah (student) – Psychology Brownfield, Adam (student) – Psychology Description: This project examines a method of teaching words to deaf readers by dividing target words into meaningful parts (morphemes) that pertain to well-known ASL signs. Such a presentation of meaningful word segments contrasts with the usual method that many deaf readers use to learn new words, namely, by memorizing either whole letter strings or one or more graphical features that they consider salient. The proposed method may prove beneficial to deaf readers because it promises to foster the effective decoding of the meaning of newly encountered words by emphasizing their morphological composition. It may allow deaf readers to partly sidestep the memory challenges of learning words as entire unanalyzed units. Once well learned, a morpheme-based strategy could be applied to decode the meanings of the many thousands of words composed of these meaningful word parts. In addition, the initial analytical processing of words into their morphemes may allow readers to develop more structured representations of the words that would lead to more efficient activation of their meanings when encountered in the future. The proposed study will test the efficacy of an approach that presents words segmented according to their constituent morphemes by comparing it to the more commonplace approach of presenting words as whole units or presenting them separated into syllables (i.e., phonology based grouping). Development is complete on screening measures and procedures, training materials and procedures, and outcome measures. All of the latter are automated. Data collection will begin soon. Funding source: GRI Priority Fund, NSF (VL2) FY 2007-2008 product(s): Kelly, L., & Barac-Cikoja, D. (2008, February). Elements of skill crucial for deaf readers: What we know, what we don’t know, and promise (not promises) for the future. Presentation at the Visual Language and Learning (VL2) Series, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC. A-41

Comparison <strong>of</strong> Lexical Versus Morphological Grouping <strong>of</strong> Graphemes in<br />

Learning New Words<br />

Status: Ongoing Begin date: March 2007 End date: No set date<br />

Principal Investigator(s):<br />

Barac-Cikoja, Dragana – <strong>Gallaudet</strong> Research<br />

Institute<br />

Kelly, Leonard – <strong>Gallaudet</strong> Research Institute<br />

Other Investigator(s):<br />

Qi, Sen – <strong>Gallaudet</strong> Research Institute<br />

Cole, Kevin – <strong>Gallaudet</strong> Research Institute<br />

Klein, Leslie (student) – Psychology<br />

Murphy, Leah (student) – Psychology<br />

Brownfield, Adam (student) – Psychology<br />

Description:<br />

This project examines a method <strong>of</strong> teaching words to deaf readers by dividing target words<br />

into meaningful parts (morphemes) that pertain to well-known ASL signs. Such a presentation <strong>of</strong><br />

meaningful word segments contrasts with the usual method that many deaf readers use to learn new<br />

words, namely, by memorizing either whole letter strings or one or more graphical features that they<br />

consider salient. The proposed method may prove beneficial to deaf readers because it promises to<br />

foster the effective decoding <strong>of</strong> the meaning <strong>of</strong> newly encountered words by emphasizing their<br />

morphological composition. It may allow deaf readers to partly sidestep the memory challenges <strong>of</strong><br />

learning words as entire unanalyzed units. Once well learned, a morpheme-based strategy could be<br />

applied to decode the meanings <strong>of</strong> the many thousands <strong>of</strong> words composed <strong>of</strong> these meaningful<br />

word parts. In addition, the initial analytical processing <strong>of</strong> words into their morphemes may allow<br />

readers to develop more structured representations <strong>of</strong> the words that would lead to more efficient<br />

activation <strong>of</strong> their meanings when encountered in the future.<br />

The proposed study will test the efficacy <strong>of</strong> an approach that presents words segmented<br />

according to their constituent morphemes by comparing it to the more commonplace approach <strong>of</strong><br />

presenting words as whole units or presenting them separated into syllables (i.e., phonology based<br />

grouping). Development is complete on screening measures and procedures, training materials and<br />

procedures, and outcome measures. All <strong>of</strong> the latter are automated. Data collection will begin soon.<br />

Funding source: GRI Priority Fund, NSF (VL2)<br />

<strong>FY</strong> 2007-<strong>2008</strong> product(s):<br />

Kelly, L., & Barac-Cikoja, D. (<strong>2008</strong>, February). Elements <strong>of</strong> skill crucial for deaf readers: What we know, what we don’t know, and<br />

promise (not promises) for the future. Presentation at the Visual Language and Learning (VL2) Series, <strong>Gallaudet</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong>, Washington, DC.<br />

A-41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!