FY 2008 Annual Report of Achievements - Gallaudet University
FY 2008 Annual Report of Achievements - Gallaudet University FY 2008 Annual Report of Achievements - Gallaudet University
Languages spoken in the homes of MSSD students. English was the most common language spoken in the homes of MSSD students. Seven percent of students came from Spanishspeaking homes. An additional 7% of students came from homes in which Arabic, Chinese, Creole, Tagalog, French, Mongolian, Italian, Lithuanian, and other languages were spoken. Twenty-nine percent of MSSD students live in homes where sign language, including ASL, is used. Additional disabilities. The national proportion of students with physical or cognitive disabilities enrolled in programs serving deaf and hard of hearing students was three times that of MSSD (51% vs. 17%). The largest difference was among deaf students identified as having speech or language impairments—nationally the proportion was 25% compared to no students at MSSD. The most prevalent disabilities among MSSD students were Attention Deficit Disorder and learning disabilities. Table 49. Percentage of MSSD Students With Disabilities by Grade, September 2007 130 GRI Annual Survey 1 (N=35,706) All students (N=164) MSSD Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Disabilities (N=15) (N=37) (N=47) (N=65) All conditions 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% No disabilities Deaf students with 1 or more additional 49% 84% 60% 87% 79% 91% disabilities 51% 17% 40% 14% 21% 9% Low vision 4% 1% 7% 0% 2% 0% Legally blind 1%
Table 50. Number of MSSD Students With Disabilities by Grade, September 2007 MSSD GRI Annual Disabilities Survey 1 All students Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 All conditions 35,706 164 15 37 47 65 No disabilities Deaf students with 1 or more additional 17,340 137 9 32 37 59 disabilities 18,366 27 6 5 10 6 Low vision 1,281 2 1 0 1 0 Legally blind 513 1 1 0 0 0 Learning disabled Attention Deficit 2,868 10 1 0 4 5 Disorder Speech/language 1,836 14 3 4 6 1 impairment 8,893 0 0 0 0 0 Mentally retarded 2,849 0 0 0 0 0 Emotional disorder Developmental 638 1 0 0 1 0 delay 1,368 0 0 0 0 0 Autism Orthopedic 469 0 0 0 0 0 impairment Traumatic brain 1,439 2 0 1 0 1 injury Other health 107 0 0 0 0 0 impairments 1,277 0 0 0 0 0 Other conditions NA 1 1 0 0 0 1From Regional and national summary report of data from the 2006-2007 Annual Survey of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children and Youth, by Gallaudet Research Institute, 2007, Washington, DC: Gallaudet University. Support Services MSSD provides an array of educationally related services to students who need them to benefit from the instructional program. Fifty-seven percent of MSSD students received one or more support services compared to 92% of deaf and hard of hearing students nationwide (see Table 51). However, the GRI Annual Survey reports about students from early childhood through high school age in both special programs and public school programs. For example, the Annual Survey includes students in mainstream settings who receive sign language interpreting services. Sign language interpreting would be needed less often in a high school like MSSD, where both written English and ASL are integral to the instructional environment, providing a comprehensively accessible communication environment for deaf students. The proportion of MSSD students receiving counseling services was greater than the proportion of students in other programs. MSSD freshman received more support services, particularly counseling, than did students in the other grades. At MSSD, 67% of students from traditionally underserved racial/ethnic groups received some type of support service compared to 44% of Caucasian students (see Table 53). Higher percentages of students from traditionally underserved racial/ethnic groups received speech training/therapy than did Caucasian students, while Caucasian students received a somewhat higher rate of counseling services. 131
- Page 88 and 89: professionals who are interested in
- Page 90 and 91: to post assignments and participate
- Page 92 and 93: its effect on language acquisition,
- Page 94 and 95: • Culver City, Calif. Quest condu
- Page 96 and 97: History 1857 Amos Kendall establish
- Page 98 and 99: conference. More than 300 people re
- Page 100 and 101: 92 Government Performance and Resul
- Page 102 and 103: 94 Survey sample for measures 3.4,
- Page 104 and 105: 15. A Lifetime of Learning and Earn
- Page 106 and 107: The numbers reflected in tables 22-
- Page 108 and 109: Clerc Center Catalog. The Clerc Cen
- Page 110 and 111: Publications The Clerc Center produ
- Page 112 and 113: Art Exhibition. Yes, I Can!, a body
- Page 114 and 115: 106 Table 24. FY 2008 Training and
- Page 116 and 117: 108 Table 27. FY 2008 Training and
- Page 118 and 119: 110 Table 30. FY 2008 Clerc Center
- Page 120 and 121: KDES Initiatives Literacy initiativ
- Page 122 and 123: other teams, parents, and individua
- Page 124 and 125: 116 KDES Student Characteristics, R
- Page 126 and 127: Traditionally underserved racial/et
- Page 128 and 129: Table 37. Number of KDES Students W
- Page 130 and 131: Table 39. Number of KDES Students R
- Page 132 and 133: 124 Table 41. Number of KDES Studen
- Page 134 and 135: Table 43. Number of KDES Students R
- Page 136 and 137: Table 45. Percentage of MSSD Studen
- Page 140 and 141: Table 51. Percentage of MSSD Studen
- Page 142 and 143: 134 Table 53. Percentage of MSSD St
- Page 144 and 145: MSSD Student Outcomes Student readi
- Page 146 and 147: Reading achievement of graduates. A
- Page 148 and 149: Table 59. Percentage of MSSD Gradua
- Page 150 and 151: 142 Division of Administration and
- Page 153 and 154: Table of Contents UNIVERSITY RESEAR
- Page 155 and 156: AN AUTOMATIC FITTING ALGORITHM FOR
- Page 157 and 158: DRINKING AMONG DEAF AND HARD OF HEA
- Page 159 and 160: University Research Projects The Hi
- Page 161 and 162: Arnos, K.S. (2008, March). Genetics
- Page 163 and 164: Research Stipends to Support Senior
- Page 165 and 166: Chemistry and Physics District of C
- Page 167 and 168: time (new documentation/updated pro
- Page 169 and 170: Communication Studies Families Who
- Page 171 and 172: Strauss, K.P., & Harkins, J. (2007,
- Page 173 and 174: achieved; three of the children als
- Page 175 and 176: The central focus of the ongoing an
- Page 177 and 178: Mertens, D.M. (2008, July). Transfo
- Page 179 and 180: ICARE Schools: A Research Study of
- Page 181 and 182: FY 2007-2008 product(s): Gerner de
- Page 183 and 184: It Takes a Village Status: Ongoing
- Page 185 and 186: Empowering Deaf Communities in Lati
- Page 187 and 188: investigating issues that affect th
Languages spoken in the homes <strong>of</strong> MSSD students. English was the most common<br />
language spoken in the homes <strong>of</strong> MSSD students. Seven percent <strong>of</strong> students came from Spanishspeaking<br />
homes. An additional 7% <strong>of</strong> students came from homes in which Arabic, Chinese, Creole,<br />
Tagalog, French, Mongolian, Italian, Lithuanian, and other languages were spoken. Twenty-nine<br />
percent <strong>of</strong> MSSD students live in homes where sign language, including ASL, is used.<br />
Additional disabilities. The national proportion <strong>of</strong> students with physical or cognitive<br />
disabilities enrolled in programs serving deaf and hard <strong>of</strong> hearing students was three times that <strong>of</strong> MSSD<br />
(51% vs. 17%). The largest difference was among deaf students identified as having speech or language<br />
impairments—nationally the proportion was 25% compared to no students at MSSD. The most<br />
prevalent disabilities among MSSD students were Attention Deficit Disorder and learning disabilities.<br />
Table 49. Percentage <strong>of</strong> MSSD Students With Disabilities by Grade, September 2007<br />
130<br />
GRI <strong>Annual</strong><br />
Survey 1<br />
(N=35,706)<br />
All<br />
students<br />
(N=164)<br />
MSSD<br />
Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12<br />
Disabilities<br />
(N=15) (N=37) (N=47) (N=65)<br />
All conditions 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%<br />
No disabilities<br />
Deaf students with 1<br />
or more additional<br />
49% 84% 60% 87% 79% 91%<br />
disabilities 51% 17% 40% 14% 21% 9%<br />
Low vision 4% 1% 7% 0% 2% 0%<br />
Legally blind 1%