FY 2008 Annual Report of Achievements - Gallaudet University
FY 2008 Annual Report of Achievements - Gallaudet University FY 2008 Annual Report of Achievements - Gallaudet University
92 Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA): Clerc Center The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) requires that federally supported programs establish performance measures to monitor progress toward objectives. Gallaudet University, including the Clerc Center, works with the U.S. Department of Education to determine such measures. Data for these indicators are collected and reported annually. The goals, objectives, and performance measures reported below are those that apply to the Clerc Center. These results come in part from data in the tables presented later in this report (see National Mission Data Summary). The FY 2008 performance results follow. The U.S. Department of Education’s program goal for Gallaudet University (excerpt) To challenge students who are deaf to achieve their academic goals and obtain productive employment, provide leadership in setting the national standard for best practices in education of the deaf and hard of hearing, and establish a sustainable resource base. Objective 1: The Model Secondary School for the Deaf (MSSD) and Kendall Demonstration Elementary School (KDES) will optimize the number of students completing programs of study. Measure 1.4: The enrollment in the Model Secondary School for the Deaf FY 08 Target: 225 FY 08 Performance: 164 Measure 1.5: The enrollment in the Kendall Demonstration Elementary School FY 08 Target: 140 FY 08 Performance: 127 Discussion: The official enrollment date is September 15 preceding the October 1 start of the fiscal year. Measure 1.11: Graduation rate of Model Secondary School students FY 08 Target: 90% FY 08 Performance: 91% Discussion: This indicator was revised to accommodate MSSD’s fifth-year extended senior program option. It is a cohort-based, cumulative senior graduation rate. Each senior cohort includes those students who enroll as first-year seniors each academic year. These seniors are then followed for two years, with the cumulative on-time and extended-time graduation rate reported at the end of the second year. These calculations remove members of the senior cohort who transfer to other diploma-granting high school programs but retain senior withdrawals who drop out or whose destination is unknown. The FY 2008 cohort was formed from FY 2007 new seniors who were expected to graduate no later than the end of FY 2008. By the end of FY 2007, 64% of this cohort had completed the MSSD program on time. By the end of FY 2008, an additional 27% of the cohort had completed the MSSD program in extended time. The FY 08 performance, then, is the two-year cumulative graduation rate.
Objective 2: Gallaudet University works in partnership with others to develop and disseminate educational programs and materials for deaf and hard of hearing students. Measure 2.1: The number of other programs and/or institutions adopting Model/Kendall innovative strategies/curricula or modifying their strategies as a result of Model and Kendall’s leadership FY 08 Target: 55 FY 08 Performance: 54 Discussion: The Clerc Center will work with the U.S. Department of Education to develop a new outreach outcome measure for this objective. Objective 3: Curriculum and extracurricular activities prepare students to meet the skill requirements of the workplace and/or to continue their studies. Measure 3.4: The percentage of Model Secondary School graduates who were in jobs within four months to one year after graduation FY 08 Target: New baseline to be set FY 08 Performance: 33% Discussion: For MSSD students who graduated in 2007, 33% reported being employed one year after graduation. For MSSD students who graduated in 2008, 7% were employed four months after graduation. In FY 2007, this measure was changed to reflect only the percentage of graduates in jobs. Calculations are based on the number of respondents to each survey. Measure 3.5: The percentage of Model Secondary School graduates who are in advanced education or training programs within four months to one year after graduation FY 08 Target: New baseline to be set FY 08 Performance: 75% Discussion: For MSSD students who graduated in 2007, 75% reported being enrolled in postsecondary programs one year after graduation. For MSSD students who graduated in 2008, 71% were enrolled in postsecondary programs four months after graduation. In FY 2007, this measure was changed to reflect only the percentage of graduates in advanced education or training programs. Calculations are based on the number of respondents to each survey. Measure 3.6: The percentage of Model Secondary School graduates who were not in jobs or postsecondary (advanced education or training) programs within four months to one year after graduation FY 08 Target: New baseline to be set FY 08 Performance: 0% Discussion: For MSSD students who graduated in 2007, none reported not being in jobs or enrolled in postsecondary programs one year after graduation. For MSSD students who graduated in 2008, 21% were not in jobs or enrolled in postsecondary programs four months after graduation. In FY 2007 this measure was changed to reflect only the percentage of graduates who were neither in jobs nor postsecondary education programs. Calculations are based on the number of respondents to each survey. Note for measures 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6. Because some graduates may be both working and attending postsecondary education programs, the U.S. Department of Education has requested that the total percentage be disaggregated to show the percentages of graduates who are (a) working, (b) attending postsecondary education or training, and (c) neither working nor attending postsecondary programs. Targets for this disaggregated reporting have not yet been set. 93
- Page 50 and 51: Living on Campus Many students opt
- Page 52 and 53: Employee and Faculty Characteristic
- Page 54 and 55: Challenges and Plans for the Future
- Page 56 and 57: importance to deaf and hard of hear
- Page 58 and 59: Table 10. The Project Table: FY 200
- Page 60 and 61: Literacy Project Title (PIs listed
- Page 62 and 63: Literacy Project Title (PIs listed
- Page 64 and 65: Literacy Project Title (PIs listed
- Page 66 and 67: Literacy Project Title (PIs listed
- Page 68 and 69: Literacy Project Title (PIs listed
- Page 70 and 71: Dussias, P.G., & Piñar, P. (in pre
- Page 72 and 73: Marschark, M., & Hauser, P.C. (Eds.
- Page 74 and 75: Presentations Adams, E., & Brice P.
- Page 76 and 77: Koo, D. (2007, October 31-November
- Page 78 and 79: Sass-Lehrer, M. (2008, February). C
- Page 80 and 81: Figure 37. Research at Gallaudet, 2
- Page 82 and 83: 74 Table 11. FY 2008 Awards: Report
- Page 84 and 85: 76 Table 12. FY 2008 Proposals: Rep
- Page 86 and 87: 78 Table 12. FY 2008 Proposals: Rep
- Page 88 and 89: professionals who are interested in
- Page 90 and 91: to post assignments and participate
- Page 92 and 93: its effect on language acquisition,
- Page 94 and 95: • Culver City, Calif. Quest condu
- Page 96 and 97: History 1857 Amos Kendall establish
- Page 98 and 99: conference. More than 300 people re
- Page 102 and 103: 94 Survey sample for measures 3.4,
- Page 104 and 105: 15. A Lifetime of Learning and Earn
- Page 106 and 107: The numbers reflected in tables 22-
- Page 108 and 109: Clerc Center Catalog. The Clerc Cen
- Page 110 and 111: Publications The Clerc Center produ
- Page 112 and 113: Art Exhibition. Yes, I Can!, a body
- Page 114 and 115: 106 Table 24. FY 2008 Training and
- Page 116 and 117: 108 Table 27. FY 2008 Training and
- Page 118 and 119: 110 Table 30. FY 2008 Clerc Center
- Page 120 and 121: KDES Initiatives Literacy initiativ
- Page 122 and 123: other teams, parents, and individua
- Page 124 and 125: 116 KDES Student Characteristics, R
- Page 126 and 127: Traditionally underserved racial/et
- Page 128 and 129: Table 37. Number of KDES Students W
- Page 130 and 131: Table 39. Number of KDES Students R
- Page 132 and 133: 124 Table 41. Number of KDES Studen
- Page 134 and 135: Table 43. Number of KDES Students R
- Page 136 and 137: Table 45. Percentage of MSSD Studen
- Page 138 and 139: Languages spoken in the homes of MS
- Page 140 and 141: Table 51. Percentage of MSSD Studen
- Page 142 and 143: 134 Table 53. Percentage of MSSD St
- Page 144 and 145: MSSD Student Outcomes Student readi
- Page 146 and 147: Reading achievement of graduates. A
- Page 148 and 149: Table 59. Percentage of MSSD Gradua
Objective 2: <strong>Gallaudet</strong> <strong>University</strong> works in partnership with others to develop and disseminate<br />
educational programs and materials for deaf and hard <strong>of</strong> hearing students.<br />
Measure 2.1: The number <strong>of</strong> other programs and/or institutions adopting Model/Kendall<br />
innovative strategies/curricula or modifying their strategies as a result <strong>of</strong> Model and<br />
Kendall’s leadership<br />
<strong>FY</strong> 08 Target: 55 <strong>FY</strong> 08 Performance: 54<br />
Discussion: The Clerc Center will work with the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Education to<br />
develop a new outreach outcome measure for this objective.<br />
Objective 3: Curriculum and extracurricular activities prepare students to meet the skill<br />
requirements <strong>of</strong> the workplace and/or to continue their studies.<br />
Measure 3.4: The percentage <strong>of</strong> Model Secondary School graduates who were in jobs within<br />
four months to one year after graduation<br />
<strong>FY</strong> 08 Target: New baseline to be set <strong>FY</strong> 08 Performance: 33%<br />
Discussion: For MSSD students who graduated in 2007, 33% reported being employed<br />
one year after graduation. For MSSD students who graduated in <strong>2008</strong>, 7% were employed<br />
four months after graduation.<br />
In <strong>FY</strong> 2007, this measure was changed to reflect only the percentage <strong>of</strong> graduates in<br />
jobs. Calculations are based on the number <strong>of</strong> respondents to each survey.<br />
Measure 3.5: The percentage <strong>of</strong> Model Secondary School graduates who are in advanced<br />
education or training programs within four months to one year after graduation<br />
<strong>FY</strong> 08 Target: New baseline to be set <strong>FY</strong> 08 Performance: 75%<br />
Discussion: For MSSD students who graduated in 2007, 75% reported being enrolled<br />
in postsecondary programs one year after graduation. For MSSD students who graduated in<br />
<strong>2008</strong>, 71% were enrolled in postsecondary programs four months after graduation.<br />
In <strong>FY</strong> 2007, this measure was changed to reflect only the percentage <strong>of</strong> graduates in<br />
advanced education or training programs. Calculations are based on the number <strong>of</strong><br />
respondents to each survey.<br />
Measure 3.6: The percentage <strong>of</strong> Model Secondary School graduates who were not in jobs or<br />
postsecondary (advanced education or training) programs within four months to one year<br />
after graduation<br />
<strong>FY</strong> 08 Target: New baseline to be set <strong>FY</strong> 08 Performance: 0%<br />
Discussion: For MSSD students who graduated in 2007, none reported not being in<br />
jobs or enrolled in postsecondary programs one year after graduation. For MSSD students<br />
who graduated in <strong>2008</strong>, 21% were not in jobs or enrolled in postsecondary programs four<br />
months after graduation.<br />
In <strong>FY</strong> 2007 this measure was changed to reflect only the percentage <strong>of</strong> graduates<br />
who were neither in jobs nor postsecondary education programs. Calculations are based on<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> respondents to each survey.<br />
Note for measures 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6. Because some graduates may be both working and attending<br />
postsecondary education programs, the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Education has requested that<br />
the total percentage be disaggregated to show the percentages <strong>of</strong> graduates who are (a)<br />
working, (b) attending postsecondary education or training, and (c) neither working nor<br />
attending postsecondary programs. Targets for this disaggregated reporting have not yet<br />
been set.<br />
93