24.10.2012 Views

GOLIATH - Music Inc. Magazine

GOLIATH - Music Inc. Magazine

GOLIATH - Music Inc. Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

38 I MUSIC INC. I JUNE 2010<br />

TWO INDEPENDENT MUSIC RETAILERS DEBATE THE<br />

ADVANTAGES OF MINIMUM ADVERTISED PRICE (MAP) POLICIES<br />

JAMES BETHEA THE PERFECT GUITAR/THE PERFECT BASS BATON ROUGE, LA.<br />

WE NEED TO<br />

BETHEA<br />

ABANDON MAP JAMES<br />

Iam relatively new to our industry, having<br />

started my business in 2002. But in<br />

the last eight years, I have developed a<br />

theory about minimum advertised price<br />

(MAP) policies.<br />

When large-scale retailers entered the<br />

market, they enjoyed massive economies<br />

of scale and were able to negotiate better<br />

relationships with suppliers than smaller<br />

retailers. They were also able to sustain<br />

smaller margins by way of volume.<br />

Suppliers have become dependent on<br />

these large retailers as they have become<br />

more dominant in the retail space. This<br />

has fostered a PR nightmare for suppliers<br />

with their smaller independent retailers.<br />

MAP was developed in an honest attempt<br />

to maintain brand values, or simply to<br />

placate indie retailers.<br />

I believe some suppliers are truly concerned<br />

about their brand equity, but I<br />

also believe others are more interested in<br />

providing lip service to smaller stores in<br />

order to salvage their businesses. Either<br />

way, I don’t think many will argue that<br />

MAP policies are effective.<br />

MAP CONSEQUENCES<br />

Large-scale retailers now have the<br />

power to either abide by policies<br />

adopted by manufacturers or not, and at<br />

their sole discretion. After all, will a manufacturer<br />

really give up 25–50 percent of<br />

its sales to maintain a policy that’s ineffective?<br />

I also see smaller retailers disregarding<br />

MAP policies and cutting prices<br />

to the bone to compete with larger dealers.<br />

Unfortunately, current economic conditions<br />

have made this problem worse<br />

than ever before.<br />

On the supply side, MAP policies tend<br />

to be enforced selectively. This makes it<br />

more difficult for new competitors on the<br />

retail side to emerge as major players.<br />

Either by design or by chance, we have<br />

ended up with a system that protects<br />

larger players and suppresses potential<br />

retail competitors. At the core of the<br />

problem lies MAP policies.<br />

THE CROSSROADS<br />

At its best, MAP is ineffective. At its<br />

worst, it’s oppressive for consumers<br />

and smaller retailers. Ineffective because<br />

there are always retailers willing to forgo<br />

their contractual obligations to secure a<br />

sale. Oppressive because it forces those of<br />

us willing to stick to our contractual obligations<br />

to remain at a disadvantage,<br />

despite natural market forces of supply<br />

and demand. This keeps prices artificially<br />

high, which is bad for consumers.<br />

After studying, participating in and<br />

competing in our industry during the last<br />

few years, the road signs are in sight. We<br />

are at a crossroads. We must seriously<br />

consider leaving MAP behind or prepare<br />

to endure painful consequences.<br />

We can continue to embrace MAP and<br />

encourage the dominance of a handful of<br />

massive players, or we can unshackle the<br />

marketplace and get back to a more competitive<br />

environment where we control our<br />

destinies as individual business owners.<br />

WHY WE SHOULD ABANDON MAP<br />

Freedom equals opportunity. Free<br />

1. market capitalism is the American way.<br />

It has provided us with a level of prosperity<br />

for more people than any other system in<br />

the world, for all recorded history. It represents<br />

the freedom to chart your own<br />

course, set your own sails, and take control<br />

of your success or failure. MAP policies are<br />

inherently anti-capitalistic by means of dictating<br />

what we can or cannot do in our<br />

own businesses, which we have put much<br />

sweat and treasure into.<br />

Doing away with MAP policies will<br />

unshackle our creativity and let us compete<br />

with the best of the best on every<br />

level. It will also remove any suspicion<br />

regarding the legality of these policies.<br />

With all the litigation surrounding MAP,<br />

why do we continue to embrace it? I<br />

want to be free to run my business the<br />

way I see fit, and that includes pricing.<br />

James Bethea, continued on page 40<br />

XPOINT<br />

MAP<br />

KEEPS<br />

PRICES<br />

ARTIFICIALLY<br />

HIGH.<br />

MAP IS<br />

ANTI-CAPITALISTIC<br />

BY DICTATING OUR<br />

ACTIONS.<br />

DOING AWAY WITH<br />

MAP WILL MAKE US<br />

MORE CREATIVE<br />

AND PROMOTE<br />

GREATER PRICING<br />

TRANSPARENCY.<br />

MAP ONLY<br />

SERVES TO<br />

PROTECT LARGER<br />

RETAILERS AND<br />

SUPPRESSES<br />

POTENTIAL INDIE<br />

COMPETITION.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!