Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
38 I MUSIC INC. I JUNE 2010<br />
TWO INDEPENDENT MUSIC RETAILERS DEBATE THE<br />
ADVANTAGES OF MINIMUM ADVERTISED PRICE (MAP) POLICIES<br />
JAMES BETHEA THE PERFECT GUITAR/THE PERFECT BASS BATON ROUGE, LA.<br />
WE NEED TO<br />
BETHEA<br />
ABANDON MAP JAMES<br />
Iam relatively new to our industry, having<br />
started my business in 2002. But in<br />
the last eight years, I have developed a<br />
theory about minimum advertised price<br />
(MAP) policies.<br />
When large-scale retailers entered the<br />
market, they enjoyed massive economies<br />
of scale and were able to negotiate better<br />
relationships with suppliers than smaller<br />
retailers. They were also able to sustain<br />
smaller margins by way of volume.<br />
Suppliers have become dependent on<br />
these large retailers as they have become<br />
more dominant in the retail space. This<br />
has fostered a PR nightmare for suppliers<br />
with their smaller independent retailers.<br />
MAP was developed in an honest attempt<br />
to maintain brand values, or simply to<br />
placate indie retailers.<br />
I believe some suppliers are truly concerned<br />
about their brand equity, but I<br />
also believe others are more interested in<br />
providing lip service to smaller stores in<br />
order to salvage their businesses. Either<br />
way, I don’t think many will argue that<br />
MAP policies are effective.<br />
MAP CONSEQUENCES<br />
Large-scale retailers now have the<br />
power to either abide by policies<br />
adopted by manufacturers or not, and at<br />
their sole discretion. After all, will a manufacturer<br />
really give up 25–50 percent of<br />
its sales to maintain a policy that’s ineffective?<br />
I also see smaller retailers disregarding<br />
MAP policies and cutting prices<br />
to the bone to compete with larger dealers.<br />
Unfortunately, current economic conditions<br />
have made this problem worse<br />
than ever before.<br />
On the supply side, MAP policies tend<br />
to be enforced selectively. This makes it<br />
more difficult for new competitors on the<br />
retail side to emerge as major players.<br />
Either by design or by chance, we have<br />
ended up with a system that protects<br />
larger players and suppresses potential<br />
retail competitors. At the core of the<br />
problem lies MAP policies.<br />
THE CROSSROADS<br />
At its best, MAP is ineffective. At its<br />
worst, it’s oppressive for consumers<br />
and smaller retailers. Ineffective because<br />
there are always retailers willing to forgo<br />
their contractual obligations to secure a<br />
sale. Oppressive because it forces those of<br />
us willing to stick to our contractual obligations<br />
to remain at a disadvantage,<br />
despite natural market forces of supply<br />
and demand. This keeps prices artificially<br />
high, which is bad for consumers.<br />
After studying, participating in and<br />
competing in our industry during the last<br />
few years, the road signs are in sight. We<br />
are at a crossroads. We must seriously<br />
consider leaving MAP behind or prepare<br />
to endure painful consequences.<br />
We can continue to embrace MAP and<br />
encourage the dominance of a handful of<br />
massive players, or we can unshackle the<br />
marketplace and get back to a more competitive<br />
environment where we control our<br />
destinies as individual business owners.<br />
WHY WE SHOULD ABANDON MAP<br />
Freedom equals opportunity. Free<br />
1. market capitalism is the American way.<br />
It has provided us with a level of prosperity<br />
for more people than any other system in<br />
the world, for all recorded history. It represents<br />
the freedom to chart your own<br />
course, set your own sails, and take control<br />
of your success or failure. MAP policies are<br />
inherently anti-capitalistic by means of dictating<br />
what we can or cannot do in our<br />
own businesses, which we have put much<br />
sweat and treasure into.<br />
Doing away with MAP policies will<br />
unshackle our creativity and let us compete<br />
with the best of the best on every<br />
level. It will also remove any suspicion<br />
regarding the legality of these policies.<br />
With all the litigation surrounding MAP,<br />
why do we continue to embrace it? I<br />
want to be free to run my business the<br />
way I see fit, and that includes pricing.<br />
James Bethea, continued on page 40<br />
XPOINT<br />
MAP<br />
KEEPS<br />
PRICES<br />
ARTIFICIALLY<br />
HIGH.<br />
MAP IS<br />
ANTI-CAPITALISTIC<br />
BY DICTATING OUR<br />
ACTIONS.<br />
DOING AWAY WITH<br />
MAP WILL MAKE US<br />
MORE CREATIVE<br />
AND PROMOTE<br />
GREATER PRICING<br />
TRANSPARENCY.<br />
MAP ONLY<br />
SERVES TO<br />
PROTECT LARGER<br />
RETAILERS AND<br />
SUPPRESSES<br />
POTENTIAL INDIE<br />
COMPETITION.