Construction Program Management and Inspection Guide

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SAMPLE 8.6.5 – Backfill Material for Pipes (Continued from page B-58) Appendix B: Quality Assurance Resources CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION GUIDE (5/01/04) Targets and Engineering Limits Lower Upper Engineering Engineering Material Type(s) Quality Characteristic Limit Target Limit Soil Classification (AASHTO M145) Hard, durable stone and sand per M1.03.0 12.5 mm Sieve 50 Per SC 85 Gradation 4.75 mm Sieve 40 Per SC 75 (AASHTO T11) (AASHTO T27) 300 µm Sieve 8 Per SC 28 75 µm Sieve 0 Per SC 10 Gravel Plasticity Index (AASHTO T90) N.P. N.P. N.P. Borrow Maximum Dry Density (Wdm ) SC - 5 kg/m3 Per SC SC + 5 kg/m3 (M1.03.0) (AASHTO T180, Method D) Optimum Moisture Content (W mo ) SC - 2% Per SC SC + 2% (AASHTO T180, Method D) Maximum Stone Size - - 75 mm Maximum Lift Thickness - - 150 mm In-Place Density 95% W dm 100% W dm - (AASHTO T310, Method B) In-Place Moisture Content W mo - 2% (W mo ) W mo + 2% (AASHTO T310, Method B) B–59
B–60 Appendix B: Quality Assurance Resources SAMPLE CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION GUIDE (5/01/04) 8.7 - Application of Quality Level Analysis in the Acceptance Determination In addition to evaluation for conformance with the Engineering Limits identified above, the QC and Acceptance test results for each Lot of Earthwork material will be continuously evaluated using Quality Level Analysis (QLA) for the following Quality Characteristics: ▼ In-Place Density ▼ In-Place Moisture Content The QLA for each Lot must indicate a Percent Within Limits (PWL) of 85% or higher, based upon the Targets and Specification Limits indicated in the Table below, in order for the Work to be accepted by Transportation Agency. Quality Level Analysis - Targets and Specification Limits Specification Limits Quality Characteristic Target LSL USL In-place Density 100% of W dm 95% of W dm None In-place Moisture Optimum (W mo ) W mo – 1% W mo + 1% 9.0 – Other Relevant contractor QC Plans All Subcontractor and Producer QC activities for Earthwork are addressed within this QC Plan. There are no separate Subcontractor or Producer QC Plans included as Appendices at this time. In the event that separate Subcontractor or Producer QC Plans are submitted for Earthwork activity, this ABC Contractors Quality Control Plan for Section 1 – Earthwork will be amended to include such Plans and resubmitted for Transportation Agency approval.
Page 1 and 2:
Construction Program Management and
Page 3 and 4:
Notice This publication is dissemin
Page 5 and 6:
iv Contents CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM MA
Page 8 and 9:
List of Acronyms AASHTO American As
Page 10:
1. Introduction The Federal Highway
Page 13 and 14:
2-2 Background CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
Page 15 and 16:
3-2 Construction Program Management
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 28:
5. Summary ▼ Construction program
Page 31 and 32:
A-2 AppendixA: Policy Memoranda Reg
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 40 and 41:
SAMPLE Appendix B: Quality Assuranc
Page 42 and 43:
SAMPLE Appendix B: Quality Assuranc
Page 44 and 45:
SAMPLE Outline of Contractor Qualit
Page 46 and 47:
SAMPLE below). This does not includ
Page 48 and 49: SAMPLE Contractor Evaluation The pe
Page 50 and 51: SAMPLE Continued from previous page
Page 56 and 57: SAMPLE A Model Quality Control Plan
Page 58 and 59: SAMPLE Submitted By: Approved By: S
Page 60 and 61: SAMPLE ▼ Rock Excavate - Earthwor
Page 62 and 63: SAMPLE 2.2 - Qualified Off-Site Pro
Page 64 and 65: SAMPLE 3.0 Quality Control Laborato
Page 66 and 67: SAMPLE 4.1.2 - Roadway Embankment M
Page 68 and 69: SAMPLE Material Source Characteriza
Page 70 and 71: SAMPLE 4.2.2 - Mix Designs Earthwor
Page 72 and 73: SAMPLE 5.4 - QC Sampling and Testin
Page 74 and 75: SAMPLE 5.4.3 - Embankment Material
Page 76 and 77: SAMPLE 5.4.5 - Backfill Material fo
Page 78 and 79: SAMPLE 6.0 Production Facility Mana
Page 80 and 81: SAMPLE 6.4 - Production Facility Co
Page 82 and 83: SAMPLE Earthwork Item Placement Equ
Page 84 and 85: SAMPLE Step J. - If the PWL for Con
Page 86 and 87: SAMPLE 7.5 - Placement Control Char
Page 88 and 89: SAMPLE ▼ Once the cause of the fa
Page 90 and 91: SAMPLE 8.6 - Application of Enginee
Page 96 and 97: SAMPLE 8.6.4 - Backfill Material fo
Page 100 and 101: SAMPLE Appendix C: Process Review/P
Page 102 and 103: SAMPLE V. Overview of the Program R
Page 104 and 105: SAMPLE Special Emphasis Areas Desig
Page 106 and 107: SAMPLE Criteria Assessment Review F
Page 108 and 109: SAMPLE input. It is recommended, th
Page 110 and 111: SAMPLE The guidelines should also b
Page 112 and 113: SAMPLE weeks should be adequate. Th
Page 114 and 115: SAMPLE cases where there is no spec
Page 116 and 117: SAMPLE Appendix C: Process Review/P
Page 118: SAMPLE Summary of Duties Process Re
Page 121 and 122: D-2 Appendix D: Inspections-in-Dept
Page 129 and 130: D-10 Appendix D: Inspections-in-Dep
Page 144 and 145: Appendix E: Technical References an
Page 146 and 147: Shallow Foundations (training cours
Page 148 and 149:
Appendix F: Examples of Reporting P
Page 150 and 151:
Progress and Quality of Work Report
Page 152 and 153:
Materials and Quality Control Repor
Page 154 and 155:
Construction Operations and Feature
Page 156 and 157:
Subcontracting Report Item Names of
Page 158 and 159:
Appendix F: Examples of Reporting P
Page 160 and 161:
Staffing and Project Control Report
Page 162:
Evaluation of Design and Potential
Page 165 and 166:
G-2 Appendix G: Project Implementat
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
G-10 Appendix G: Project Implementa
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
show all

Construction Program Management and Inspection Guide

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?