Construction Program Management and Inspection Guide
Construction Program Management and Inspection Guide
Construction Program Management and Inspection Guide
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
F–14<br />
Appendix F: Examples of Reporting Practices<br />
CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION GUIDE (5/01/04)<br />
Claims <strong>and</strong> Potential Claims<br />
Report Items<br />
The contractor has submitted seven claims totaling<br />
$379,221.41. Following is a brief discussion of each including<br />
the current status: (amounts, facts, alleged claims, <strong>and</strong> initial<br />
State analysis of each has been omitted here for brevity).<br />
Longitudinal bracing was required for the detour by the<br />
railroad <strong>and</strong> State. There has been a minor dispute over this<br />
item.<br />
While excavating on June 9, the contractor broke a water line.<br />
A repair joint was installed by the contractor. Since there was<br />
less than 38 cm (1ft) of cover over the pipe, the contractor will<br />
be filing a claim. The water line was there before the existing<br />
roadway was built.<br />
The contractor has filed a notice of intent to file a claim for<br />
additional excavation quantity at Pier 5. Contract plans<br />
provide for pay limits for riprap excavation at a 1:1 slope.<br />
Based on observations at this inspection, it appears that the<br />
contractor is accomplishing an excavation slope of 2.5:1 or 3:1.<br />
The project manager is taking appropriate action to resist such<br />
a claim.<br />
Comments<br />
The recording of claims <strong>and</strong> potential claims permits FHWA<br />
to begin evaluation of their merits at an early date. Specifics<br />
are of value here.<br />
In this case, a dispute has been identified, but the value of the<br />
comment is limited since neither the nature of the dispute nor<br />
parties involved, i.e., contractor, railroad, State, etc. were<br />
included.<br />
In this instance, the facts upon which the claim is based have<br />
been appropriately noted.<br />
Contractor actions affecting claims should be recorded as was<br />
done here. The State’s position on the claim is also of value.