14.10.2013 Views

Construction Program Management and Inspection Guide

Construction Program Management and Inspection Guide

Construction Program Management and Inspection Guide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

F–14<br />

Appendix F: Examples of Reporting Practices<br />

CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION GUIDE (5/01/04)<br />

Claims <strong>and</strong> Potential Claims<br />

Report Items<br />

The contractor has submitted seven claims totaling<br />

$379,221.41. Following is a brief discussion of each including<br />

the current status: (amounts, facts, alleged claims, <strong>and</strong> initial<br />

State analysis of each has been omitted here for brevity).<br />

Longitudinal bracing was required for the detour by the<br />

railroad <strong>and</strong> State. There has been a minor dispute over this<br />

item.<br />

While excavating on June 9, the contractor broke a water line.<br />

A repair joint was installed by the contractor. Since there was<br />

less than 38 cm (1ft) of cover over the pipe, the contractor will<br />

be filing a claim. The water line was there before the existing<br />

roadway was built.<br />

The contractor has filed a notice of intent to file a claim for<br />

additional excavation quantity at Pier 5. Contract plans<br />

provide for pay limits for riprap excavation at a 1:1 slope.<br />

Based on observations at this inspection, it appears that the<br />

contractor is accomplishing an excavation slope of 2.5:1 or 3:1.<br />

The project manager is taking appropriate action to resist such<br />

a claim.<br />

Comments<br />

The recording of claims <strong>and</strong> potential claims permits FHWA<br />

to begin evaluation of their merits at an early date. Specifics<br />

are of value here.<br />

In this case, a dispute has been identified, but the value of the<br />

comment is limited since neither the nature of the dispute nor<br />

parties involved, i.e., contractor, railroad, State, etc. were<br />

included.<br />

In this instance, the facts upon which the claim is based have<br />

been appropriately noted.<br />

Contractor actions affecting claims should be recorded as was<br />

done here. The State’s position on the claim is also of value.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!