14.10.2013 Views

Construction Program Management and Inspection Guide

Construction Program Management and Inspection Guide

Construction Program Management and Inspection Guide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Documentation<br />

Division offices should document the effectiveness of their<br />

construction management programs. Documentation should<br />

include observations, findings <strong>and</strong> resolutions, <strong>and</strong> any<br />

special reports. This evaluation should also discuss quality<br />

management initiatives <strong>and</strong> summarize the capability <strong>and</strong><br />

performance of the STA in carrying out its Federal-aid<br />

construction program. Additional detail is provided in the<br />

sidebar to the right.<br />

Objectives of <strong>Inspection</strong><br />

<strong>Inspection</strong>s, either at the project or program level, are the<br />

primary method used by FHWA for fulfilling its<br />

construction program oversight responsibilities. Oversight<br />

represents the compliance or verification component of<br />

FHWA’s stewardship activities.<br />

Project oversight requirements may be different<br />

depending upon the stewardship agreements, but the general<br />

objectives of construction inspections are the same. Although<br />

STAs may be delegated the authority to administer the<br />

program within the scope of 23 USC <strong>and</strong> related Federal<br />

laws, FHWA retains the responsibility to assure that projects<br />

are being administered in full compliance. Specific objectives<br />

are as follows:<br />

1. Obtain assurance that the project has been completed in<br />

reasonably close conformity with plans <strong>and</strong> specifications<br />

including authorized changes <strong>and</strong> extra work. Provide a<br />

basis for acceptance of the project <strong>and</strong> reimbursement of<br />

project costs with Federal-aid funds.<br />

2. Acquire information on problems <strong>and</strong> construction<br />

changes. Provide an opportunity for timely remedial<br />

action where applicable. Provide documentation of<br />

solutions to problems or commitments. Encourage other<br />

STA units’ involvement <strong>and</strong> awareness of problems to<br />

avoid future reoccurrence.<br />

3. Assess the State’s abilities <strong>and</strong> effectiveness in managing<br />

<strong>and</strong> controlling Federal-aid construction projects with<br />

respect to items such as these:<br />

▼ Qualifications—training, certification, written<br />

guidance<br />

▼ Staffing, equipment, <strong>and</strong> facilities<br />

▼ Performance<br />

▼ Project documentation, including inspection diaries,<br />

test reports, etc.<br />

4. Promote the development <strong>and</strong> implementation of quality<br />

management programs.<br />

<strong>Construction</strong> <strong>Program</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION GUIDE (5/01/04)<br />

<strong>Construction</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong> Report<br />

Possible Items Suitable for Inclusion<br />

Number <strong>and</strong> value of contracts awarded by type.<br />

Number <strong>and</strong> value of active projects by type <strong>and</strong> area.<br />

Field engineer workload—project complexity.<br />

Number of inspections <strong>and</strong> reviews made by type <strong>and</strong><br />

area.<br />

Process/Statewide Reviews by phase.<br />

Selected Emphasis Reviews by phase.<br />

Summary of reviews—objectives, findings (including<br />

frequency <strong>and</strong> significance), conclusions,<br />

recommendations, <strong>and</strong> disposition or actions taken.<br />

Overall review of accomplishments as they relate to the<br />

division’s “risk analysis.”<br />

<strong>Program</strong> modifications with supporting explanations.<br />

– Impact of the construction inspection program: Does it<br />

make a difference?<br />

– Productivity of reviews: What is effective?<br />

Areas of concern: construction improvements needed or<br />

achieved.<br />

– Adequacy of specifications <strong>and</strong> plans.<br />

– Adequacy of construction supervision: manpower<br />

management, construction workload.<br />

– Comments on State’s construction manual.<br />

– Comments on construction practices attributed to<br />

contract documents or bidding practices.<br />

– Number of documented concerns with resolution.<br />

– <strong>Program</strong> developments, such as materials sampling <strong>and</strong><br />

testing by contractor, experimental projects <strong>and</strong><br />

recycling, new methods <strong>and</strong> equipment, new<br />

specifications.<br />

– Project cost or time creep trends.<br />

– Environmental mitigation measures accomplished<br />

during construction.<br />

Areas needing added emphasis—future construction<br />

inspection program needs.<br />

Suggested program changes—program management,<br />

directives, etc.<br />

Use of quality-level analysis.<br />

Frequency <strong>and</strong> documentation of project contacts.<br />

Activities that are not project-specific, such as State, district,<br />

or laboratory contacts <strong>and</strong> relationships.<br />

<strong>Construction</strong>-related promotional activities.<br />

Training received by State employees <strong>and</strong> its effectiveness<br />

<strong>and</strong> usefulness (not restricted to FHWA training).<br />

FHWA <strong>and</strong> State organizational changes—functions <strong>and</strong><br />

individuals.<br />

Final assessment of the acceptability of the State’s<br />

construction program.<br />

Recommendations for reviews to be considered in the next<br />

fiscal year’s risk analysis.<br />

3–3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!