Construction Program Management and Inspection Guide

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SAMPLE Appendix C: Process Review/Product Evaluation Guidelines CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION GUIDE (5/01/04) APPENDIX C Sample Guidelines for Process Review/Product Evaluation Programs California Division C–2 Program Review/Product Evaluation Program Illinois Division C–8 Guidelines for Conducting Process Reviews See also review information in Appendix E, Technical Resources C–1
Appendix C: Process Review/Product Evaluation Guidelines CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION GUIDE (5/01/04) C–2 SAMPLE California Division Office Procedure Memorandum SUBJECT: Program Review/Product Evaluation Program D6101 February 10, 1993 I.Table of Contents Section II: References Section III: Purpose Section IV: Background Section V: Overview of Program Review and Product Evaluation Section VI: Developmental Procedures for the Annual Review Schedule Section VII: Milestones Section VIII: Program Approval and Review Procedures II. References 23 CFR 640.115 Evaluations FAPG G6021.2 Monitoring of Federal-aid Highway Design Projects PM D6021 Design Monitoring Program PM D6420 Construction Monitoring Program PM D6520 Certification Acceptance Procedures PM D1601 Program Review/Product Evaluation Program Guide III. Purpose This issuance supersedes the December 9, 1982, Procedure Memorandum “Process Review - Engineering Management Assessment Plan.” The purpose of this Division Office Procedure Memorandum is to describe the Program Review/Product Evaluation Program (PR/PE). The program provides a basis to fulfill requirements for the administration of the Federalaid program as prescribed in regulations and directives. The program also evaluates the quality of the work performed and maintains lines of communication with responsible State and Local Agency representatives for the transfer of technology. Additionally, the program facilitates a continual evaluation of the Division’s operations to ensure quality engineering and environmental processes and products. IV. Background In 1977, the California Certification Acceptance (CA) Plan was approved for Local Agency projects and amended in the same year to include all State-administered projects not on the Interstate system. This was the beginning of the California Division Office’s process review program for conducting oversight responsibilities on CA projects. The process review program continued until 1991 when the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 was implemented. Major changes to Title 23 USC in program direction and permissive delegations to the States were introduced. A major provision of the new Act allowed the States to accept increased levels of authority that exempted various types of Federal-aid highway projects from FHWA project review and oversight. In response to the authority granted by this provision, FHWA entered into agreement with Caltrans, approved May 12, 1992, that provided Caltrans with the maximum delegation of authority allowed by law. This authority, granted through Stewardship agreements, delegated oversight authority to Caltrans for “Exempt” projects. In order to better address these program changes and new directions, it is FHWA’s policy to increasingly rely on the State organizations for detailed, project-related actions. In keeping with this policy, the Program Review/Product Evaluation will be the California Division Office’s primary mode of operation in carrying out its program oversight responsibilities. This does not preclude the use of other program monitoring techniques, including project-specific activities when appropriate. Factors to be considered in advancing this policy include: ▼ Level of Federal Interest ▼ Technical Complexity ▼ Local Circumstances ▼ Risk Management ▼ Statutory Requirements This Program Review/Product Evaluation Program will cover all activities for exempt projects on the National Highway System (NHS), projects administered under Certification Acceptance, and non-Title 23 activities for non-NHS projects.
Page 1 and 2:
Construction Program Management and
Page 3 and 4:
Notice This publication is dissemin
Page 5 and 6:
iv Contents CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM MA
Page 8 and 9:
List of Acronyms AASHTO American As
Page 10:
1. Introduction The Federal Highway
Page 13 and 14:
2-2 Background CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
Page 15 and 16:
3-2 Construction Program Management
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 28:
5. Summary ▼ Construction program
Page 31 and 32:
A-2 AppendixA: Policy Memoranda Reg
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 40 and 41:
SAMPLE Appendix B: Quality Assuranc
Page 42 and 43:
SAMPLE Appendix B: Quality Assuranc
Page 44 and 45:
SAMPLE Outline of Contractor Qualit
Page 46 and 47:
SAMPLE below). This does not includ
Page 48 and 49:
SAMPLE Contractor Evaluation The pe
Page 50 and 51: SAMPLE Continued from previous page
Page 56 and 57: SAMPLE A Model Quality Control Plan
Page 58 and 59: SAMPLE Submitted By: Approved By: S
Page 60 and 61: SAMPLE ▼ Rock Excavate - Earthwor
Page 62 and 63: SAMPLE 2.2 - Qualified Off-Site Pro
Page 64 and 65: SAMPLE 3.0 Quality Control Laborato
Page 66 and 67: SAMPLE 4.1.2 - Roadway Embankment M
Page 68 and 69: SAMPLE Material Source Characteriza
Page 70 and 71: SAMPLE 4.2.2 - Mix Designs Earthwor
Page 72 and 73: SAMPLE 5.4 - QC Sampling and Testin
Page 74 and 75: SAMPLE 5.4.3 - Embankment Material
Page 76 and 77: SAMPLE 5.4.5 - Backfill Material fo
Page 78 and 79: SAMPLE 6.0 Production Facility Mana
Page 80 and 81: SAMPLE 6.4 - Production Facility Co
Page 82 and 83: SAMPLE Earthwork Item Placement Equ
Page 84 and 85: SAMPLE Step J. - If the PWL for Con
Page 86 and 87: SAMPLE 7.5 - Placement Control Char
Page 88 and 89: SAMPLE ▼ Once the cause of the fa
Page 90 and 91: SAMPLE 8.6 - Application of Enginee
Page 102 and 103: SAMPLE V. Overview of the Program R
Page 104 and 105: SAMPLE Special Emphasis Areas Desig
Page 106 and 107: SAMPLE Criteria Assessment Review F
Page 108 and 109: SAMPLE input. It is recommended, th
Page 110 and 111: SAMPLE The guidelines should also b
Page 112 and 113: SAMPLE weeks should be adequate. Th
Page 114 and 115: SAMPLE cases where there is no spec
Page 116 and 117: SAMPLE Appendix C: Process Review/P
Page 118: SAMPLE Summary of Duties Process Re
Page 121 and 122: D-2 Appendix D: Inspections-in-Dept
Page 129 and 130: D-10 Appendix D: Inspections-in-Dep
Page 144 and 145: Appendix E: Technical References an
Page 146 and 147: Shallow Foundations (training cours
Page 148 and 149: Appendix F: Examples of Reporting P
Page 150 and 151:
Progress and Quality of Work Report
Page 152 and 153:
Materials and Quality Control Repor
Page 154 and 155:
Construction Operations and Feature
Page 156 and 157:
Subcontracting Report Item Names of
Page 158 and 159:
Appendix F: Examples of Reporting P
Page 160 and 161:
Staffing and Project Control Report
Page 162:
Evaluation of Design and Potential
Page 165 and 166:
G-2 Appendix G: Project Implementat
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
G-10 Appendix G: Project Implementa
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
show all

Construction Program Management and Inspection Guide

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?