13.10.2013 Views

Understanding Human Communication

Understanding Human Communication

Understanding Human Communication

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

318 PART THREE COMMUNICATION IN GROUPS<br />

CULTURAL IDIOM<br />

off the wall: unconventional,<br />

ridiculous<br />

go along with the crowd: agree<br />

with the majority<br />

rock the boat: disturb a stable<br />

condition<br />

Conformity and Nonconformity:<br />

Long and Short Views<br />

When we look a little closer, we see<br />

an inconsistency in the way our<br />

society seems to feel about<br />

conformity (team playing) and<br />

nonconformity (deviance). For<br />

example, one of the great best-sellers<br />

of the 1950s was a book by John F.<br />

Kennedy called Profiles in Courage,<br />

wherein the author praised several<br />

politicians for their courage in<br />

resisting great pressure and refusing<br />

to conform. To put it another way,<br />

Kennedy was praising people who<br />

refused to be good team players,<br />

people who refused to vote or act as<br />

their parties or constituents expected<br />

them to. Although their actions earned<br />

Kennedy’s praise long after the deeds<br />

were done, the immediate reactions<br />

of their colleagues were generally far<br />

from positive. The nonconformist may<br />

be praised by historians or idolized in<br />

films or literature long after the fact of<br />

his nonconformity, but he’s usually not<br />

held in high esteem, at the time, by<br />

those people to whose demands he<br />

refuses to conform.<br />

Elliot Aronson<br />

The Social Animal<br />

Pressure to Conform<br />

There’s a strong tendency for group members to go along with the crowd,<br />

which often results in bad decisions. A classic study by Solomon Asch illustrated<br />

this point.College students were shown three lines of different lengths and asked<br />

to identify which of them matched with a fourth line. Although the correct answer<br />

was obvious, the experiment was a setup: Asch had instructed all but one<br />

member of the experimental groups to vote for the wrong line. As a result, fully<br />

one-third of the uninformed subjects ignored their own good judgment and voted<br />

with the majority. If simple tasks like this one generate such conformity, it is<br />

easy to see that following the (sometimes mistaken) crowd is even more likely<br />

in the much more complex and ambiguous tasks that most groups face.<br />

Even when there’s no overt pressure to follow the majority, more subtle influences<br />

motivate members—especially in highly cohesive groups—to keep quiet<br />

rather than voice any thoughts that deviate from what appears to be the consensus.“Why<br />

rock the boat if I’m the only dissenter?”members think.“And if everybody<br />

else feels the same way, they’re probably right.”<br />

With no dissent, the group begins to take on a feeling of invulnerability: an<br />

unquestioning belief that its ideas are correct and even morally right. As its position<br />

solidifies, outsiders who disagree can be viewed as the enemy, disloyal to<br />

what is obviously the only legitimate viewpoint. Social scientists use the term<br />

groupthink to describe a group’s collective striving for unanimity that discourages<br />

realistic appraisals of alternatives to its chosen decision. 43 Several group practices<br />

can discourage this troublesome force. 44 A first step is to recognize the prob-<br />

Source: THEFARSIDE © 1984 FARWORKS, INC. Used by permission. All Rights Reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!