Annual Report 2012 - ffiec
Annual Report 2012 - ffiec
Annual Report 2012 - ffiec
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Task Force on <strong>Report</strong>s meeting.<br />
(PRA) from the U.S. Office of Management<br />
and Budget (OMB), the<br />
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation<br />
(FDIC), the Board of<br />
Governors of the Federal Reserve<br />
System (FRB), and the Office of<br />
the Comptroller of the Currency<br />
(OCC) (collectively, the banking<br />
agencies) implemented a limited<br />
number of revisions to the<br />
Call <strong>Report</strong> in March and June<br />
<strong>2012</strong>. The revisions had initially<br />
been issued for public comment<br />
in November 2011. Two reporting<br />
changes were made in March <strong>2012</strong><br />
in connection with the initial filing<br />
of the Call <strong>Report</strong> by savings associations:<br />
new items for reporting<br />
on Qualified Thrift Lender compliance<br />
and revisions to certain items<br />
used to calculate the leverage<br />
capital ratio denominator. Instructional<br />
revisions in March <strong>2012</strong><br />
included guidance on the accounting<br />
and reporting treatment for<br />
capital contributions in the form of<br />
cash or notes receivable. <strong>Report</strong>ing<br />
changes that took effect in June<br />
<strong>2012</strong> included new items for mortgage<br />
loan representation and warranty<br />
reserves as well as past due<br />
and nonaccrual purchased creditimpaired<br />
loans. Several new items<br />
to meet deposit insurance assessment<br />
needs, for which approval<br />
had been received from OMB in<br />
connection with a substantial revision<br />
of the Call <strong>Report</strong> assessment<br />
data schedule that took place in<br />
2011, also were added to the Call<br />
<strong>Report</strong> in June <strong>2012</strong>. These additional<br />
assessment items apply<br />
only to large and highly complex<br />
institutions and institutions owning<br />
another insured depository<br />
institution.<br />
2013 Call <strong>Report</strong> Revisions<br />
The banking agencies’ November<br />
2011 Call <strong>Report</strong> proposal also<br />
contained new schedules for the<br />
collection of disaggregated loan<br />
loss allowance data and selected<br />
loan origination data from larger<br />
institutions, which generated substantive<br />
comments. After modifying<br />
the proposed loan loss allowance<br />
schedule in response to<br />
comments received, the task force<br />
approved the addition of this new<br />
schedule to the Call <strong>Report</strong> effec-<br />
tive March 31, 2013. This schedule,<br />
which OMB approved in January<br />
2013, will be applicable to institutions<br />
with $1 billion or more in<br />
total assets. Although the agencies<br />
considered alternative approaches<br />
to collecting loan origination data<br />
in an effort to address industry<br />
comments on the proposal, the<br />
task force decided not to pursue<br />
implementation of this proposed<br />
new schedule in the Call <strong>Report</strong>.<br />
Institutions were notified of these<br />
decisions in the fourth quarter of<br />
<strong>2012</strong>.<br />
In the second quarter of <strong>2012</strong>, the<br />
task force began evaluating several<br />
recommendations from the<br />
banking agencies and the Consumer<br />
Financial Protection Bureau<br />
(CFPB) for potential Call <strong>Report</strong><br />
revisions to be implemented<br />
in 2013. As it considered these<br />
potential reporting changes, the<br />
task force also sought to limit the<br />
extent to which the changes would<br />
apply to community institutions.<br />
In the fourth quarter, the task force<br />
agreed to include several revisions<br />
in a proposal to be issued for comment.<br />
The proposed Call <strong>Report</strong><br />
revisions, which generally would<br />
take effect in June 2013, include<br />
consumer deposit account balance<br />
data, details on service charges on<br />
consumer deposit accounts, information<br />
about and data on international<br />
remittance transfers, depository<br />
institution trade names used<br />
on physical branches and Internet<br />
Web sites that differ from an<br />
institution’s legal title, the total<br />
liabilities of an institution’s parent<br />
depository institution holding<br />
company that is not a bank or savings<br />
and loan holding company,<br />
and a scope revision to an existing<br />
item in the equity capital reconciliation.<br />
The proposal would also<br />
contain new and revised items for<br />
use in the FDIC’s deposit insurance<br />
pricing model for large and<br />
highly complex institutions as well<br />
as instructional revisions to imple-<br />
13