12.10.2013 Views

Potato Stores in Great Britain - The Food and Environment Research ...

Potato Stores in Great Britain - The Food and Environment Research ...

Potato Stores in Great Britain - The Food and Environment Research ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PESTICIDE USAGE SURVEY REPORT 174<br />

POTATO STORES<br />

IN GREAT BRITAIN<br />

2000<br />

H. H. Dennison, D. G. Garthwaite & M. R. Thomas<br />

Pesticide Usage Survey Group<br />

Central Science Laboratory<br />

S<strong>and</strong> Hutton<br />

York UK<br />

YO41 1LZ<br />

Department for <strong>Environment</strong>, <strong>Food</strong> & Rural Affairs<br />

&<br />

Scottish Executive <strong>Environment</strong> & Rural Affairs Department


CONTENTS PAGE<br />

Def<strong>in</strong>itions iii<br />

Summary 1<br />

Introduction 2<br />

Methods 4<br />

Results <strong>and</strong> discussion<br />

Ware potatoes 6<br />

Tables 8<br />

Seed potatoes 12<br />

Tables 13<br />

Comparison with previous surveys <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 15<br />

Acknowledgements 20<br />

References 20<br />

Appendix 21<br />

ii


DEFINITIONS<br />

a) 'Applications' is used throughout this report to refer to the number of pesticide treatments applied to a store<br />

(whole or part).<br />

b) 'Basic tonnes treated' is the gross weight of potatoes treated with pesticides exclud<strong>in</strong>g repeat applications, i.e.<br />

the total tonnes stored m<strong>in</strong>us tonnes receiv<strong>in</strong>g no treatment.<br />

c) 'Tonnage treated' is the gross weight of potatoes treated with pesticides <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g repeat applications, i.e. basic<br />

tonnes treated x number of applications.<br />

d) ‘Bulk stores’ <strong>in</strong>clude loose potatoes <strong>in</strong> a variety of stores, as opposed to those stored <strong>in</strong> boxes or bags.<br />

e) ‘Outdoor clamps’ <strong>in</strong>clude potatoes stored <strong>in</strong> the field <strong>in</strong> a temporary structure. <strong>The</strong>se structures are often<br />

constructed from straw bales or soil.<br />

f) ‘Unventilated stores’ <strong>in</strong>clude structures which are naturally ventilated <strong>and</strong> rely on convective ventilation.<br />

g) ‘Ventilated stores’ <strong>in</strong>clude structures us<strong>in</strong>g forced air ventilation. <strong>The</strong>y do not use refrigeration methods.<br />

h) ‘Refrigerated stores’ <strong>in</strong>clude structures us<strong>in</strong>g refrigeration; they may also have forced air ventilation.<br />

i) ′Merchant′ is a BPC registered purchaser, a merchant or processor who has traded 100 tonnes of potatoes or<br />

more <strong>in</strong> the most recent full crop year <strong>and</strong> therefore qualifies for payment of British <strong>Potato</strong> Council levy (British<br />

<strong>Potato</strong> Council List of Registered Purchasers July 2001).<br />

j) ′Farm Store′ holds only potatoes from a s<strong>in</strong>gle hold<strong>in</strong>g, where the store is located, for a period of more than 2<br />

months.<br />

k) In this report the term ‘formulation(s)’ is used to describe the pesticide active substance or mixture of active<br />

substances <strong>in</strong> a product(s).<br />

l) ‘Seed potatoes’ are those stored <strong>and</strong> used for plant<strong>in</strong>g the next season’s crop. Prior to plant<strong>in</strong>g, seed potatoes<br />

are placed <strong>in</strong> a ‘chitt<strong>in</strong>g house’ where the tuber can develop/germ<strong>in</strong>ate prior to plant<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

m) “Ware potatoes” are those used for human consumption, either prior to or after process<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

n) <strong>The</strong> ‘Advisory Committee on Pesticides’ is a statutory body set up by m<strong>in</strong>isters under section 16(7) of the <strong>Food</strong><br />

& <strong>Environment</strong> Protection Act 1985 to advise on all matters relat<strong>in</strong>g to the control of pesticides. For further<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation visit the website – www.pesticides.gov.uk/committees/acp/acp.htm<br />

o) ‘Arable crops’ <strong>in</strong>clude cereals, comb<strong>in</strong>able peas & beans, oilseed rape, l<strong>in</strong>seed, potatoes <strong>and</strong> sugar beet.<br />

QUALITY CONTROL OF DATA<br />

All field data are collected by personal <strong>in</strong>terview us<strong>in</strong>g fully qualified staff work<strong>in</strong>g to st<strong>and</strong>ard operat<strong>in</strong>g procedures.<br />

Supplementary postal data are collected from merchant stores with storeowners complet<strong>in</strong>g st<strong>and</strong>ard forms to set<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g procedures. Paper records are held at S<strong>and</strong> Hutton, but <strong>in</strong>dividual hold<strong>in</strong>gs cannot be identified. Data are<br />

entered onto a computer database which has extensive error check<strong>in</strong>g rout<strong>in</strong>es associated with the <strong>in</strong>put program. Each<br />

item of data is then checked after entry <strong>and</strong> subsequently all forms are re-checked by someone other than the orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

operator. Prior to compilation of the tables, the data are further subjected to a range of computer checks to detect,<br />

amongst other th<strong>in</strong>gs, any values, which, on agronomic grounds, appear suspect. Any thus revealed are further<br />

scrut<strong>in</strong>ised, <strong>and</strong>, if necessary, referred back to the orig<strong>in</strong>al source. All the tables are prepared by computer once the data<br />

set is considered correct, thus elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g transcription <strong>and</strong> typographical errors.<br />

iii


SUMMARY<br />

This report presents <strong>in</strong>formation on all aspects of pesticide usage dur<strong>in</strong>g storage of potatoes harvested <strong>in</strong> 2000 <strong>and</strong> stored<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g 2000/01. Data were collected from visits to 90 hold<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> by post from 104 merchants.<br />

<strong>The</strong> total weight of ware potatoes stored from the 2000 harvest was 4.09 million tonnes, of which this survey estimated<br />

that 49% received no treatment. <strong>The</strong> basic tonnage treated was 2.08 million tonnes, though some potatoes received<br />

multiple treatments. <strong>The</strong> active substance chlorpropham, a potato sprout suppressant, accounted for 85% of the total<br />

tonnage treated, while 4.6% were treated with pyrethr<strong>in</strong>s, 3% with tecnazene <strong>and</strong> 2% with thiabendazole. <strong>The</strong>re were 61<br />

tonnes of active substances used to treat ware potatoes. Chlorpropham (82%), tecnazene (14%), <strong>and</strong> thiabendazole (4%)<br />

accounted for nearly all of the weight of active substances used.<br />

From this survey, it is estimated that 20% of the 428,700 tonnes of seed potatoes stored were treated, generally receiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

one application. <strong>The</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> formulations used were imazalil, dichlorophen <strong>and</strong> 2-am<strong>in</strong>obutane account<strong>in</strong>g for 94%, 3%<br />

<strong>and</strong> 2% of the total tonnage treated respectively. Just over one tonne of active substances were used, pr<strong>in</strong>cipally imazalil<br />

(61% of the total weight), <strong>and</strong> 2-am<strong>in</strong>obutane (29%).<br />

A comparison is made between this survey <strong>and</strong> a similar one conducted <strong>in</strong> 1998. <strong>The</strong> tonnage of ware potatoes stored<br />

was just under 2% more <strong>in</strong> the most recent survey, but the total tonnage treated was 14% less. <strong>The</strong> tonnage of ware<br />

potatoes treated with chlorpropham decreased by 9% <strong>and</strong> this was used on 85% of the total tonnage treated. <strong>The</strong> weight<br />

of active substances applied to ware potatoes decreased by 41%. N<strong>in</strong>ety four percent of all applications to ware potatoes<br />

were made by fumigation. This was also the preferred application method <strong>in</strong> 1998.<br />

<strong>The</strong> tonnage of stored seed potatoes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased by 19% between the two surveys <strong>and</strong> the basic tonnage<br />

treated decreased by 48%. Overall, there was a 78% decrease <strong>in</strong> the amount of active substances used on seed potatoes.<br />

1


INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent Advisory Committee on Pesticides advises the British Government on all aspects of pesticide use. In<br />

order to discharge this function the Committee must regularly monitor the usage of all pesticides <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>. It<br />

needs accurate data on the usage of <strong>in</strong>dividual pesticides.<br />

As part of the ongo<strong>in</strong>g process for obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g data, the Pesticide Usage Survey Teams of the Central Science Laboratory,<br />

an executive agency of <strong>The</strong> Department for <strong>Environment</strong>, <strong>Food</strong> & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) <strong>and</strong> the Scottish Agricultural<br />

Science Agency, an agency of the Scottish Executive <strong>Environment</strong> Rural Affairs Department (SEERAD), conducted a<br />

survey of pesticide usage <strong>in</strong> potato stores on farms <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g potatoes harvested <strong>in</strong> 2000. However, visits<br />

to hold<strong>in</strong>gs had to be curtailed <strong>in</strong> February of 2001 because of the potential risks <strong>in</strong>volved result<strong>in</strong>g from the Foot <strong>and</strong><br />

Mouth outbreak. Limited visits were resumed <strong>in</strong> the autumn of 2001 to a smaller sample of hold<strong>in</strong>gs than would<br />

normally have been visited <strong>in</strong> previous years. Information was also collected from potato merchants, who stored potatoes<br />

over the same period of time, us<strong>in</strong>g a postal questionnaire.<br />

This is the fifth fully co-ord<strong>in</strong>ated survey of pesticide usage at potato stores <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>. <strong>The</strong> previous reports<br />

covered all pesticide usage on potatoes harvested <strong>and</strong> stored <strong>in</strong> 1992 (Olney & Garthwaite, 1992), 1994 (Goodw<strong>in</strong> &<br />

Garthwaite, 1994) 1996 (De’Ath et al., 1996) <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1998 (Fox et al., 1998). One previous report has covered pesticide<br />

usage <strong>in</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Wales for potatoes harvested <strong>and</strong> stored <strong>in</strong> 1988 <strong>and</strong> 1990 (Olney et al., 1992). Two previous<br />

reports have covered pesticide usage at potato stores <strong>in</strong> Scotl<strong>and</strong> (Tucker, 1978, Snowden et al., 1989) for potatoes<br />

harvested <strong>and</strong> stored <strong>in</strong> 1975 <strong>and</strong> 1986 respectively. In 1974 <strong>and</strong> 1977 <strong>in</strong>formation was collected on pesticide usage at<br />

farm stores <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> but was reported <strong>in</strong> an unraised format cover<strong>in</strong>g usage only on those farms surveyed<br />

(Chapman et al., 1977, Steed et al., 1979).<br />

A list of the most recently published reports can be found <strong>in</strong> the Appendix.<br />

2


Fig 1. Counties <strong>in</strong> DEFRA regions of Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Wales <strong>and</strong> regions covered by the SEERAD Scotl<strong>and</strong><br />

Midl<strong>and</strong>s & Western<br />

Cheshire<br />

Derbyshire<br />

<strong>Great</strong>er Manchester<br />

Hereford & Worcester<br />

Lancashire<br />

Leicestershire<br />

Merseyside<br />

Nott<strong>in</strong>ghamshire<br />

Shropshire<br />

Staffordshire<br />

Warwickshire<br />

West Midl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

Wales<br />

Clwyd<br />

Dyfed<br />

Gwent<br />

Gwynedd<br />

Mid Glamorgan<br />

Powys<br />

South Glamorgan<br />

West Glamorgan<br />

South Western<br />

Avon<br />

Cornwall<br />

Devon<br />

Dorset<br />

Gloucestershire<br />

Somerset<br />

Wiltshire<br />

Scotl<strong>and</strong><br />

Borders<br />

Central<br />

Dumfries & Galloway<br />

Fife<br />

Grampian<br />

Highl<strong>and</strong>s & Isl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

Lothian<br />

Strathclyde<br />

Tayside<br />

3<br />

Northern<br />

Cumbria<br />

Clevel<strong>and</strong><br />

Durham<br />

Humberside<br />

Northumberl<strong>and</strong><br />

North Yorkshire<br />

South Yorkshire<br />

Tyne & Wear<br />

West Yorkshire<br />

South Eastern<br />

Berkshire<br />

Buck<strong>in</strong>ghamshire<br />

East Sussex<br />

<strong>Great</strong>er London (SE)<br />

Hampshire<br />

Kent<br />

Oxfordshire<br />

Surrey<br />

West Sussex<br />

Eastern<br />

Bedfordshire<br />

Cambridgeshire<br />

Essex<br />

Hertfordshire<br />

<strong>Great</strong>er London (E)<br />

L<strong>in</strong>colnshire<br />

Norfolk<br />

Northamptonshire<br />

Suffolk


METHODS<br />

<strong>The</strong> sample<br />

<strong>The</strong> samples of hold<strong>in</strong>gs to be surveyed were selected us<strong>in</strong>g data from the Agricultural Census Returns, June 1999 for<br />

Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Wales (Anon., 2000a) <strong>and</strong> for Scotl<strong>and</strong> (Anon., 2000b).<br />

<strong>The</strong> samples were drawn to represent the area of all arable crops grown throughout Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Scotl<strong>and</strong>. For<br />

Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Wales, the sample was selected with<strong>in</strong> each of the six old MAFF regions (Fig. 1), while Scotl<strong>and</strong> was<br />

divided <strong>in</strong>to 11 l<strong>and</strong>-use regions (Wood, 1931). <strong>The</strong> samples were stratified accord<strong>in</strong>g to the total area of all arable crops<br />

grown <strong>in</strong> each region <strong>and</strong> by hold<strong>in</strong>g size group based on the total area of arable crops grown on each hold<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> area<br />

of arable crops sampled <strong>in</strong> each size group <strong>and</strong> each region was proportional to the total area of arable crops grown on<br />

hold<strong>in</strong>gs of each size group <strong>in</strong> each region.<br />

An <strong>in</strong>troductory letter was sent to the occupiers of the selected hold<strong>in</strong>gs expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the purpose of the survey. A total of<br />

825 arable hold<strong>in</strong>gs was visited <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation relat<strong>in</strong>g to potato storage was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from those grow<strong>in</strong>g potatoes. Of<br />

the 181 hold<strong>in</strong>gs grow<strong>in</strong>g potatoes, 90 (50%) stored them after harvest (Table 1). Hold<strong>in</strong>gs sell<strong>in</strong>g potatoes on to<br />

merchants were asked for details of these stores. Further <strong>in</strong>formation on these stores, <strong>and</strong> on additional storage premises,<br />

was provided by the British <strong>Potato</strong> Council (BPC). Data relat<strong>in</strong>g to pesticide usage on these premises were obta<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

postal questionnaire at a later date.<br />

Data were raised to estimate national pesticide usage (Thomas, 2001). <strong>The</strong> rais<strong>in</strong>g factors used for ware potatoes were<br />

based on a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of census data (Anon 2001a, Anon 2001b) <strong>and</strong> potato stock movement <strong>in</strong>formation provided by<br />

the BPC. Separate rais<strong>in</strong>g factors were used for seed potatoes, which were also based on BPC estimates for stored seed<br />

potatoes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Table 1 Number <strong>and</strong> distribution of stores sampled <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> - 2000<br />

Region<br />

Farm <strong>Stores</strong> Merchant <strong>Stores</strong><br />

Eastern 34 27<br />

Midl<strong>and</strong>s & Western 8 9<br />

Northern 10 15<br />

Scotl<strong>and</strong> 25 45<br />

South Eastern 6 3<br />

South Western 5 5<br />

Wales 2 .<br />

Total – all regions 90 104<br />

4


METHODS (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Questionnaire<br />

<strong>The</strong> questionnaire consisted of two forms, which were completed by an experienced surveyor dur<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>terview with<br />

the farmer, or by a store representative follow<strong>in</strong>g issue of a comprehensive set of <strong>in</strong>structions, for commercial stores.<br />

Form 1 summarised the area of potatoes grown on each hold<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g the 2000 grow<strong>in</strong>g season.<br />

Form 2 detailed all aspects of pesticide usage <strong>in</strong> each store. A separate form was completed for each method of storage<br />

<strong>and</strong> treatment programme. Seed <strong>and</strong> ware potatoes were recorded separately <strong>and</strong> identical forms were sent to merchants<br />

as part of a postal survey.<br />

TONNAGE OF POTATOES STORED<br />

It is estimated that 144,702 hectares of ware potatoes <strong>and</strong> 16,800 hectares of seed potatoes were grown <strong>in</strong> 2000 <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong><br />

Brita<strong>in</strong>. An estimated 3,059,198 tonnes of ware potatoes were stored <strong>in</strong> farm stores <strong>and</strong> 1,029,301 tonnes were stored by<br />

merchants (Table 2). An estimated 428,700 tonnes of seed potatoes were stored <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>.<br />

5


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

WARE POTATOES<br />

Storage type<br />

<strong>The</strong> three ma<strong>in</strong> types of stores on farm were ventilated (54%), refrigerated (34%) <strong>and</strong> unventilated (12%). A small<br />

quantity, (


substances (a.s.) were used on stored ware potatoes, compris<strong>in</strong>g of 50.2 tonnes of chlorpropham (82%), 8.5 tonnes of<br />

tecnazene (14%) <strong>and</strong> 2.2 tonnes of thiabendazole (4%).<br />

In farm stores chlorpropham (89%) was the ma<strong>in</strong> storage treatment used, 6% of the total tonnage was treated with<br />

propham <strong>and</strong> 6% with pyrethr<strong>in</strong>s. Forty-one tonnes of active substances were used, with chlorpropham account<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

86% <strong>and</strong> tecnazene 11%. Thiabendazole, imazalil, pyrethr<strong>in</strong>s <strong>and</strong> propham accounted for the rema<strong>in</strong>der of the weight of<br />

active substances used.<br />

At merchant stores chlorpropham was used on 90% of the total tonnage treated, with thiabendazole on 4% <strong>and</strong> tecnazene<br />

on 3%. Merchant stored potatoes were treated with approximately 21 tonnes of active substances. Chlorpropham<br />

accounted for the majority of active substances applied, at 73%, with tecnazene at 19% <strong>and</strong> thiabendazole at 7%.<br />

Stated reasons for treatment<br />

<strong>The</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> reason given for pesticide usage at farm stores, with 99% of the total tonnage treated (where a reason was<br />

given), was to suppress sprout<strong>in</strong>g (Table 6). Chlorpropham accounted for 89% of sprout suppressant usage. Imazalil was<br />

applied to 99% of the potatoes treated for disease control.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most important reason given for pesticide applications at merchants’ stores was for sprout suppression (96% where a<br />

reason was given), with 4% specify<strong>in</strong>g disease control (Table 7). Chlorpropham was the most widely used sprout<br />

suppressant account<strong>in</strong>g for 96% of all pesticide applications, with tecnazene used on just 3%. <strong>The</strong>re was only a limited<br />

use of pyrethr<strong>in</strong>s recorded, presumably for the control of flies <strong>in</strong> store.<br />

Methods of application<br />

<strong>The</strong> methods of application used on farms <strong>in</strong>cluded thermal fogs (95%), granules (3%) <strong>and</strong> sprays (2%) (Table 8). <strong>The</strong><br />

only granules applied were tecnazene formulations. <strong>The</strong> majority of spray applications comprised of thiabendazole (58%)<br />

<strong>and</strong> imazalil (42%). No dusts were used on ware potatoes at farm stores.<br />

Table 9 shows that 92% of all application methods at merchant’s stores were thermal fogs, with chlorpropham<br />

account<strong>in</strong>g for 97% of the total tonnage treated <strong>in</strong> this manner. Only four percent of applications were sprays <strong>and</strong> most of<br />

these (89%) comprised thiabendazole alone. Granular applications were made to 4% of merchant stored potatoes, with<br />

79% be<strong>in</strong>g tecnazene formulations. <strong>The</strong> only dusts used were tecnazene based.<br />

7


8<br />

Table 2 Storage methods used for ware potatoes at farm <strong>and</strong> merchant stores <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>, 2000 (tonnes stored)<br />

Outdoor Unventilated Ventilated Refrigerated Total Total -all<br />

Clamp 1 Bulk Box Bulk Box Bulk Box Bulk Box methods<br />

Farm stores 23,648 301,372 55,277 1,151,293 490,268 166,813 870,528 1,643,125 1,416,073 3,059,198<br />

Merchant stores . 12,069 14,018 163,391 397,231 32,307 410,286 207,766 821,535 1,029,301<br />

All stores 23,648 313,441 69,295 1,314,684 887,499 199,120 1,280,814 1,850,891 2,237,608 4,088,499<br />

1 By def<strong>in</strong>ition outdoor clamps are bulk storage


9<br />

Table 3 Farm <strong>Potato</strong> <strong>Stores</strong>: Storage pesticide use on ware potatoes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>, 2000 (tonnes treated)<br />

Outdoor Unventilated Ventilated Refrigerated Total Total -all<br />

Clamp 1 Bulk Box Bulk Box Bulk Box Bulk Box methods<br />

Pesticide<br />

Chlorpropham 17,880 206,428 . 671,991 409,854 105,642 580,725 1,001,940 990,578 1,992,518<br />

Chlorpropham/propham . . . 149,660 . . . 149,660 . 149,660<br />

Imazalil . . . . 11,116 . 14,419 . 25,536 25,536<br />

Pyrethr<strong>in</strong>s . . . 40,374 57,677 . 49,026 40,374 106,703 147,077<br />

Tecnazene . 17,618 12,193 3,445 36,345 . . 21,063 48,539 69,602<br />

Thiabendazole . . . . . . 34,606 . 34,606 34,606<br />

Total - all pesticides 17,880 224,046 12,193 865,469 514,992 105,642 678,776 1,213,037 1,205,962 2,418,999<br />

Not treated 11,535 180,540 43,083 612,070 226,640 72,707 481,581 876,852 751,304 1,628,156<br />

Table 4 Merchants’ <strong>Potato</strong> <strong>Stores</strong>: Storage pesticide use on ware potatoes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>, 2000 (tonnes treated)<br />

Unventilated Ventilated Refrigerated Total Total -all<br />

Bulk Box Bulk Box Bulk Box Bulk Box methods<br />

Pesticide<br />

Chlorpropham 10,305 4,642 165,758 291,430 69,627 394,398 245,690 690,470 936,160<br />

Imazalil . . . 811 . 3,713 . 4,525 4,525<br />

Pyrethr<strong>in</strong>s . . . . . 10,723 . 10,723 10,723<br />

Tecnazene 2,477 186 13,368 12,811 . 3,713 15,845 16,710 32,555<br />

Thiabendazole . . 33,421 . . 4,085 33,421 4,085 37,506<br />

Unspecified potato sprout suppressants 1,300 5,570 . 6,499 . . 1,300 12,069 13,369<br />

Total - all pesticides 14,081 10,398 212,548 311,551 69,627 416,632 296,256 738,581 1,034,837<br />

Not treated 464 3,621 16,200 136,476 12,811 214,789 29,475 354,885 384,360<br />

1 By def<strong>in</strong>ition outdoor clamps are bulk storage


Table 5 Usage of <strong>in</strong>dividual active substances on stored ware potatoes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>, 2000<br />

Farm stores Merchant stores Total<br />

Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes Tonnes<br />

treated (a.s) treated (a.s) treated (a.s)<br />

Pesticide<br />

Chlorpropham 2,142,179 34.94 936,160 15.26 3,078,338 50.19<br />

Imazalil 25,536 0.21 4,525 0.04 30,061 0.25<br />

Propham 149,660 0.18 . . 149,660 0.18<br />

Pyrethr<strong>in</strong>s 147,077 < 0.01 10,723 < 0.01 157,800 < 0.01<br />

Tecnazene 69,601 4.54 32,556 3.97 102,157 8.51<br />

Thiabendazole 34,606 0.7 37,506 1.5 72,112 2.2<br />

Unspecified potato sprout suppressants . . 13,368 . 13,368 .<br />

Total 1 – all pesticides 2,418,999 40.56 1,034,837 20.8 3,453,836 61.36<br />

Table 6 Farm <strong>Potato</strong> <strong>Stores</strong>: Storage pesticides <strong>and</strong> their reason for use on ware potatoes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>, 2000<br />

Sprout Disease Sprout supp. & Unspecified Total Active<br />

suppressant control disease control reason tonnes substance<br />

treated (tonnes)<br />

Pesticide<br />

Chlorpropham 1,427,231 . . 565,287 1,992,519 33.77<br />

Chlorpropham/propham 149,660 . . . 149,660 1.35<br />

Imazalil . 14,419 . 11,116 25,536 0.21<br />

Pyrethr<strong>in</strong>s . . . 147,077 147,077 < 0.01<br />

Tecnazene 22,366 . 202 47,033 69,601 4.54<br />

Thiabendazole . . . 34,606 34,606 0.7<br />

Total – all pesticides 1,599,257 14,419 202 805,120 2,418,999 40.56<br />

Table 7 Merchants’ <strong>Potato</strong> <strong>Stores</strong>: Storage pesticides <strong>and</strong> their reason for use on ware potatoes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>, 2000<br />

Sprout Disease Sprout supp. & Unspecified Total Active<br />

suppressant control disease control reason tonnes substance<br />

treated (tonnes)<br />

Pesticide<br />

Chlorpropham 907,763 . . 28,397 936,160 15.26<br />

Imazalil . 1,485 2,228 811 4,525 0.04<br />

Pyrethr<strong>in</strong>s . . . 10,723 10,723 < 0.01<br />

Tecnazene 26,365 . 2,477 3,713 32,556 3.97<br />

Thiabendazole . 37,506 . . 37,506 1.5<br />

Unspecified potato sprout suppressants 7,798 . . 5,570 13,368 .<br />

Total – all pesticides 941,927 38,991 4,705 49,214 1,034,837 20.8<br />

1 Denotes the total tonnage treated, not the column sum as entries are not always mutually exclusive.<br />

10


Table 8 Farm <strong>Potato</strong> <strong>Stores</strong>: Formulations of storage pesticides used on ware potatoes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>, 2000 (tonnes treated)<br />

<strong>The</strong>rmal fog Granule Spray Total<br />

Pesticide<br />

Chlorpropham 1,992,519 . . 1,992,519<br />

Chlorpropham/propham 149,660 . . 149,660<br />

Imazalil . . 25,536 25,536<br />

Pyrethr<strong>in</strong>s 147,077 . . 147,077<br />

Tecnazene . 69,601 . 69,601<br />

Thiabendazole . . 34,606 34,606<br />

Total – all pesticides 2,289,256 69,601 60,142 2,418,999<br />

Table 9 Merchants’ <strong>Potato</strong> <strong>Stores</strong>: Formulations of storage pesticides used on ware potatoes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>,2000 (tonnes treated)<br />

Dust <strong>The</strong>rmal fog Granule Spray Total<br />

Pesticide<br />

Chlorpropham . 928,001 8,158 . 936,160<br />

Imazalil . . . 4,525 4,525<br />

Pyrethr<strong>in</strong>s . 10,723 . . 10,723<br />

Tecnazene 2,663 . 29,893 . 32,556<br />

Thiabendazole . . . 37,506 37,506<br />

Unspecified potato sprout suppressant . 13,368 . . 13,368<br />

Total – all pesticides 2,663 952,092 38,052 42,030 1,034,837<br />

11


SEED POTATOES<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Storage type<br />

An estimated 428,700 tonnes of seed potatoes were stored <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> (Table 10). <strong>The</strong> majority of potatoes were<br />

stored <strong>in</strong> ventilated environments (63%), refrigerated stores accounted for a further 37%, unventilated storage be<strong>in</strong>g least<br />

common, account<strong>in</strong>g for less than 1%. All of the seed potatoes were stored <strong>in</strong> boxes.<br />

Treatment of potatoes<br />

Overall, 20% of potatoes were treated, receiv<strong>in</strong>g on average a s<strong>in</strong>gle pesticide application (Table 10 & 11). <strong>The</strong> ma<strong>in</strong><br />

products employed were imazalil (94%), 2-am<strong>in</strong>obutane (3%) <strong>and</strong> dichlorophen (2%). Boxed potatoes <strong>in</strong> ventilated<br />

stores accounted for 66% of the total tonnage treated, pr<strong>in</strong>cipally with imazalil (92%).<br />

Extent <strong>and</strong> quantity of <strong>in</strong>dividual active substances used<br />

Use of four active substances was encountered on seed potatoes (Table 12). Imazalil was used to treat the majority<br />

(94%) of the tonnage treated. Less than 2 tonnes of active substances were applied, imazalil account<strong>in</strong>g for 61% <strong>and</strong> 2am<strong>in</strong>obutane<br />

29%, with the rema<strong>in</strong>der be<strong>in</strong>g dichlorophen <strong>and</strong> tecnazene.<br />

Stated reasons for treatment<br />

Table 13 shows that the only reason specified for pesticide usage was disease control. Imazalil alone was used on 94%<br />

of the treated tonnage where a reason was specified. Dichlorophen <strong>and</strong> 2-am<strong>in</strong>obutane accounted for a further 6% <strong>and</strong><br />

4%, respectively, of the tonnage treated where a reason was specified.<br />

Methods of application<br />

Sprays accounted for 94% of the formulations used to treat seed potatoes held <strong>in</strong> store, fumigation 5% <strong>and</strong> granules the<br />

rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g one percent. <strong>The</strong> only formulation applied as a spray was imazalil. Two fumigant formulations were recorded<br />

2-am<strong>in</strong>obutane <strong>and</strong> dichlorophen. All granules were tecnazene-based formulations.<br />

N.B. All treatments to seed potatoes refer to storage treatments <strong>and</strong> do not <strong>in</strong>clude pre-plant<strong>in</strong>g seed treatments or<br />

treatments <strong>in</strong> chitt<strong>in</strong>g houses. Information on potato seed treatments can be found <strong>in</strong> the arable crops report for 2000<br />

(Garthwaite & Thomas, 2002).<br />

12


13<br />

Table 10 Storage methods used for seed potatoes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>, 2000 (tonnes stored)<br />

Unventilated Ventilated Refrigerated Total Total -all<br />

Bulk Box Bulk Box Bulk Box Bulk Box methods<br />

All regions . 1,038 . 270,651 . 157,011 . 428,700 428,700<br />

Table 11 Storage pesticide use on seed potatoes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>, 2000 (tonnes treated)<br />

Unventilated Ventilated Refrigerated Total Total -all<br />

Bulk Box Bulk Box Bulk Box Bulk Box methods<br />

Pesticide<br />

2-am<strong>in</strong>obutane . . . 2,376 . . . 2,376 2,376<br />

Dichlorophen . . . 2,001 . . . 2,001 2,001<br />

Imazalil . . . 52,005 . 28,010 . 80,015 80,015<br />

Tecnazene . . . . . 750 . 750 750<br />

Total . . . 56,381 . 28,760 . 85,142 85,142<br />

Not treated . 1,038 . 214,270 . 128,251 . 343,558 343,558


Tabe 12 Usage of <strong>in</strong>dividual active substances on stored seed potatoes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>, 2000<br />

Total tones treated 1<br />

Active substance (tonnes)<br />

Pesticide<br />

2-am<strong>in</strong>obutane 2,376 0.35<br />

Dichlorophen 2,001 0.02<br />

Imazalil 80,015 0.72<br />

Tecnazene 750 0.09<br />

Total – all pesticides 85,142 1.19<br />

Table 13 Storage pesticides <strong>and</strong> their reason for use on seed potatoes at stores <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>, 2000<br />

Disease Unspecified Total tonnes Active substance<br />

control reason treated (tonnes)<br />

Pesticide<br />

2-am<strong>in</strong>obutane 1,250 1,125 2,376 0.35<br />

Dichlorophen 2,001 . 2,001 0.02<br />

Imazalil 32,437 47,578 80,015 0.72<br />

Tecnazene . 750 750 0.09<br />

Total – all pesticides 35,688 49,454 85,142 1.19<br />

Table 14 Formulations of storage pesticides used on seed potatoes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>, 2000 (tonnes treated)<br />

Granules Fumigant Spray Total<br />

Pesticide<br />

2-am<strong>in</strong>obutane . 2,376 . 2,376<br />

Dichlorophen . 2,001 . 2,001<br />

Imazalil . . 80,015 80,015<br />

Tecnazene 750 . . 750<br />

Total – all pesticides 750 4,377 80,015 85,142<br />

1 Denotes the total tonnage treated, not the column sum as entries are not always mutually exclusive.<br />

14


COMPARISON BETWEEN SURVEYS CARRIED OUT IN GREAT BRITAIN IN 1994, 1996, 1998 & 2000<br />

In 2000, it was estimated that the tonnage of ware potatoes harvested was 6,207,600 tonnes with a yield averag<strong>in</strong>g 40.1<br />

tonnes/hectare. <strong>The</strong> area of ware potatoes grown has <strong>in</strong>creased by nearly 2% s<strong>in</strong>ce the last survey while the area of seed<br />

potatoes grown has <strong>in</strong>creased by 3%. <strong>The</strong>re has been an <strong>in</strong>crease of just under 2% <strong>in</strong> the tonnage of ware potatoes stored<br />

<strong>and</strong> an <strong>in</strong>crease of 19% <strong>in</strong> the tonnage of seed potatoes stored (Table 15).<br />

WARE POTATOES<br />

Storage type<br />

<strong>The</strong>re has been an 8% reduction <strong>in</strong> the tonnage of ware potatoes be<strong>in</strong>g stored <strong>in</strong> farm facilities s<strong>in</strong>ce 1998. In 2000 <strong>and</strong><br />

1998, ventilated stores were the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal type used, with an <strong>in</strong>crease from 40% <strong>in</strong> 1998 to 54% of ware potatoes stored<br />

<strong>in</strong> this manner on farms. This <strong>in</strong>crease is <strong>in</strong> contrast to the downward shift observed s<strong>in</strong>ce 1994, when 62% were stored<br />

<strong>in</strong> ventilated stores, to 51% <strong>in</strong> 1996 <strong>and</strong> 40% <strong>in</strong> 1998. Unventilated farm stores decreased from 24% <strong>in</strong> 1998 to 12% <strong>in</strong><br />

2000, while the proportion of refrigerated stores rema<strong>in</strong>ed similar at 36% <strong>in</strong> 1998 <strong>and</strong> 34% <strong>in</strong> 2000. In the current survey,<br />

46% of ware potatoes stored on farms were stored <strong>in</strong> boxes, whilst <strong>in</strong> 1998 the figure was 57%. In 1994 bulk storage was<br />

most common but the proportion of potatoes stored by this method has decreased from 62% <strong>in</strong> 1994, to 43% <strong>in</strong> 1998,<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g to 54% <strong>in</strong> 2000.<br />

<strong>The</strong> tonnage of ware potatoes stored by merchants <strong>in</strong>creased by 47% between 1998 <strong>and</strong> 2000. Ventilated stores were the<br />

most common store type <strong>in</strong> 2000 (54%), <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g from 38% of the total <strong>in</strong> both 1996 <strong>and</strong> 1998. Previously,<br />

refrigerated stores had been the most important account<strong>in</strong>g for 58% <strong>in</strong> 1996, 55% <strong>in</strong> 1998, decreas<strong>in</strong>g to 43% <strong>in</strong> 2000.<br />

Unventilated stores decreased from 7% <strong>in</strong> 1998 to 3% <strong>in</strong> the current survey. <strong>The</strong> majority (80%) of merchant stored<br />

potatoes were stored <strong>in</strong> boxes <strong>in</strong> both 1998 <strong>and</strong> 2000, decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g from 87% of the total <strong>in</strong> 1996.<br />

Treatment of potatoes at farm stores<br />

<strong>The</strong> percentage of potatoes treated with either sprout suppressants or aga<strong>in</strong>st storage diseases has decreased s<strong>in</strong>ce the last<br />

survey, with 47% of potatoes held <strong>in</strong> farm stores be<strong>in</strong>g treated <strong>in</strong> 2000, 55% <strong>in</strong> 1998 <strong>and</strong> 45% <strong>in</strong> 1996. This is greatly<br />

reduced from the 1994 survey, where 70% of potatoes were treated <strong>and</strong> reflects the <strong>in</strong>creased use of refrigeration <strong>and</strong> the<br />

approach<strong>in</strong>g withdrawal of tecnazene formulations. <strong>The</strong>re was a 52% decrease <strong>in</strong> the total tonnage of active substances<br />

used <strong>in</strong> farm stores between 1998 <strong>and</strong> 2000, follow<strong>in</strong>g the trend of a 14% decrease between 1996 <strong>and</strong> 1998. This was<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to a decrease <strong>in</strong> the use of tecnazene <strong>and</strong> the <strong>in</strong>creased application of chlorpropham, an active substance used<br />

at considerably lower rates when compared to tecnazene. Overall, the use of chlorpropham <strong>in</strong>creased from 39% of all<br />

tonnage treated <strong>in</strong> 1996 to 80% <strong>in</strong> 1998 <strong>and</strong> to 83% <strong>in</strong> 2000. <strong>The</strong> use of formulations conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g tecnazene decreased<br />

from 34% of the treated tonnage at farm stores used <strong>in</strong> 1996, to 10% <strong>in</strong> 1998 only 3% <strong>in</strong> 2000. <strong>The</strong> use of<br />

tecnazene/thiabendazole formulations was not recorded <strong>in</strong> 2000.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re has been a reduction <strong>in</strong> the number of formulations used on bulk-stored potatoes from seven formulations <strong>in</strong> 1996,<br />

to five <strong>in</strong> 1998 <strong>and</strong> four <strong>in</strong> 2000. <strong>The</strong> number of formulations used on boxed potatoes was six <strong>in</strong> 1996, four <strong>in</strong> 1998 with<br />

five formulations be<strong>in</strong>g found <strong>in</strong> the current survey. <strong>The</strong> use of 2-am<strong>in</strong>obutane was not encountered on either boxed or<br />

bulk stored ware potatoes <strong>in</strong> 2000.<br />

15


Treatment of potatoes at merchant stores<br />

<strong>The</strong> proportion of potatoes treated <strong>in</strong> merchant’s stores was 63%. This was an <strong>in</strong>crease s<strong>in</strong>ce the previous survey <strong>in</strong> 1998,<br />

which estimated 50% were treated. In 1996 <strong>and</strong> 1994, 68% <strong>and</strong> 87% of merchant stored potatoes were treated,<br />

respectively. <strong>The</strong> number of applications made to potatoes <strong>in</strong> store decreased to 1.7, although there was a 4.8% <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

<strong>in</strong> the tonnes of active substances used s<strong>in</strong>ce the previous survey. <strong>The</strong> proportion of bulk-stored potatoes treated<br />

decreased s<strong>in</strong>ce the last survey from 86% to 57%, <strong>and</strong> the average number of treatments fell from 2.7 to 1.7. <strong>The</strong> average<br />

number of treatments on box-stored potatoes also decreased from 2.5 to 1.6.<br />

Chlorpropham rema<strong>in</strong>ed the most important active substance used on all merchant-stored potatoes, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g from 79%<br />

of the total treated merchant-stored potatoes <strong>in</strong> 1996 to 82% <strong>in</strong> 1998 <strong>and</strong> to 90% <strong>in</strong> 2000. Seventy-four percent of these<br />

treatments were applied to box-stored potatoes, show<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>crease of 7% s<strong>in</strong>ce 1998.<br />

<strong>The</strong> trends <strong>in</strong> treatments to ware potatoes <strong>in</strong> the UK s<strong>in</strong>ce 1994 are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2 below <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> Table 15.<br />

Fig. 2 Treatments made to ware potatoes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>, 1994 to 2000<br />

Million tonnes<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Extent <strong>and</strong> quantity of active substances used<br />

<strong>The</strong> current survey recorded the use of tecnazene on only 3% of all potatoes stored on the farm <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> merchant’s stores.<br />

This contrasts with the predom<strong>in</strong>ant use of tecnazene recorded <strong>in</strong> all previous surveys.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was an overall reduction of 41% <strong>in</strong> the weight of active substances applied to ware potatoes between 1998 <strong>and</strong><br />

2000, follow<strong>in</strong>g a downward trend, with a 15% decrease hav<strong>in</strong>g been recorded between 1996 <strong>and</strong> 1998. <strong>The</strong><br />

accumulated decrease between 1994 <strong>and</strong> 2000 is 72%. <strong>The</strong> weight of chlorpropham applied rema<strong>in</strong>ed similar to that of<br />

1998, while the weight of tecnazene applied decreased further by 80% <strong>and</strong> the weight of thiabendazole applied also<br />

decreased by 78% between 1998 <strong>and</strong> 2000.<br />

Stated reasons for treatment<br />

1994 1996 1998 2000<br />

Tonnes stored Basic tonnes treated Total tonnage treated<br />

Tonnes untreated Tonnes of active substance<br />

16<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Tonnes (active substance)


In 1994, 1996 <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1998, the ma<strong>in</strong> reason for treat<strong>in</strong>g stored ware potatoes was to suppress sprout<strong>in</strong>g. This rema<strong>in</strong>s the<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> reason given <strong>and</strong> chlorpropham cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be the major active substance used, as <strong>in</strong> all previous surveys.<br />

Methods of application<br />

<strong>The</strong>rmal fogs have rema<strong>in</strong>ed the preferred method of application for farm <strong>and</strong> merchant stored potatoes. This was also<br />

the situation <strong>in</strong> 1994, 1996 <strong>and</strong> 1998.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce 1996, tecnazene has been the only dust formulation used <strong>in</strong> farm stores. In 1994, tecnazene dust formulations were<br />

used <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with thiabendazole or carbendazim. Tecnazene was also the only substance applied as a granule on<br />

ware potatoes <strong>in</strong> 1996 <strong>and</strong> 1998, whilst <strong>in</strong> 1994 chlorpropham granules were also used. <strong>The</strong> current survey found<br />

tecnazene <strong>and</strong> chlorpropham to be the only granular formulation used <strong>in</strong> merchant stores, with tecnazene the only granule<br />

formulation used <strong>in</strong> farm stores.<br />

17


SEED POTATOES<br />

Storage type<br />

<strong>The</strong> total tonnage of stored seed potatoes <strong>in</strong>creased by 19% over the period between the previous <strong>and</strong> current surveys.<br />

<strong>The</strong> proportion stored <strong>in</strong> ventilated stores decreased slightly from 64% <strong>in</strong> 1998 to 63% <strong>in</strong> 2000. Refrigerated storage<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased dur<strong>in</strong>g the same period from 24% <strong>in</strong> 1998 to 37% <strong>in</strong> 1998. All seed potatoes encountered <strong>in</strong> 2000 were stored<br />

<strong>in</strong> boxes, an <strong>in</strong>crease from 90% <strong>in</strong> 1998.<br />

Treatment of potatoes<br />

<strong>The</strong> proportion of the tonnage treated was found to have decreased between 1998 <strong>and</strong> 2000 by 28%, follow<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease from 33% <strong>in</strong> 1996 to 46% <strong>in</strong> 1998. In 2000 imazalil accounted for 94% of the total tonnage treated, 2am<strong>in</strong>obutane<br />

3%, dichlorophen 2% <strong>and</strong> tecnazene the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 1%. In 1998, imazalil accounted for 72%, imazalil/<br />

thiabendazole, 15% <strong>and</strong> 2-am<strong>in</strong>obutane 12% of the tonnage treated. In 1996, imazalil <strong>and</strong> 2-am<strong>in</strong>obutane were used to<br />

treat 53% <strong>and</strong> 40% of stored seed potatoes. Iprodione was used on 3% <strong>in</strong> 1996; but this formulation was not recorded on<br />

stored seed <strong>in</strong> the current survey.<br />

<strong>The</strong> trends <strong>in</strong> treatments to seed potatoes <strong>in</strong> the UK s<strong>in</strong>ce 1994 are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 3 below <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> Table 15.<br />

Fig. 3 Treatments made to seed potatoes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>, 1994 to 2000<br />

Thous<strong>and</strong> tonnes<br />

450<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

1994 1996 1998 2000<br />

Tonnes stored Basic tonnes treated Total tonnage treated<br />

Tonnes untreated Tonnes active substance<br />

18<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Tonnes (active substance)


Stated reasons for treatment<br />

In 2000, the only reason that treatment was given was to prevent disease, as <strong>in</strong> 1998, 1996 <strong>and</strong> 1994.<br />

Methods of application<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g the trend observed <strong>in</strong> the previous two surveys, spray applications as a percentage of the treated tonnage have<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ued to <strong>in</strong>crease from 59% <strong>in</strong> 1996 to 94% <strong>in</strong> 2000. Two fumigant formulations were found <strong>in</strong> the current survey,<br />

2-am<strong>in</strong>obutane <strong>and</strong> dichlorophen, each account<strong>in</strong>g for approximately half of the total tonnes treated by this method. <strong>The</strong><br />

only fumigant applied <strong>in</strong> both 1998 <strong>and</strong> 1996 was 2-am<strong>in</strong>obutane, possibly <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a move away from 2-am<strong>in</strong>obutane<br />

<strong>in</strong> favour of dichlorophen. Granules accounted for less than 1% of treatments <strong>in</strong> 1996, 1998 <strong>and</strong> 2000.<br />

Table 15 Comparison of production, storage <strong>and</strong> treatment of potatoes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1992-2000<br />

1994 1996 1998 2000<br />

Area grown (ha) Ware 140,346 152,776 142,119 144,702<br />

Seed 14,505 15,718 16,263 16,800<br />

Tonnes stored Ware 4,358,332 4,190,647 4,011,278 4,088,499<br />

Seed 366,675 353,615 360,611 428,700<br />

Basic tonnes treated 1 Ware 3,176,820 2,042,725 2,169,300 2,075,983<br />

Seed 127,819 117,788 164,366 85,142<br />

Total tonnage treated 2 Ware 6,128,118 3,562,785 4,019,982 3,453,836<br />

Seed 134,622 121,902 164,336 85,142<br />

Tonnes untreated 3 Ware 1,181,512 2,147,922 1,841,978 2,012,517<br />

Seed 238,856 235,827 196,245 343,558<br />

Tonnes treated 4 with Chlorpropham 4,296,254 2,149,132 3,232,223 3,078,338<br />

(ware + seed) Tecnazene 769,756 806,400 371,104 102,157<br />

Thiabendazole 982,480 610,290 253,029 72,112<br />

Amount used (tonnes a.s.) Chlorpropham 90.88 28.58 49.09 50.19<br />

(ware + seed) Tecnazene 77.29 70.68 43.31 8.6<br />

Thiabendazole 45.75 23.04 10.21 2.2<br />

1 Basic tonnes treated = tonnes stored – tonnes untreated<br />

2 Total tonnage treated = basic tonnes treated x number of treatments<br />

All pesticides 236.46 133.84 109.98 62.55<br />

3 Tonnes untreated = potatoes stored which receive NO pesticide treatments dur<strong>in</strong>g storage<br />

4 Tonnes treated = basic tonnes treated x number of treatments<br />

19


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

Thanks are due to all the growers <strong>and</strong> merchants who participated <strong>in</strong> this survey, provid<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>formation upon which<br />

this report is based. Many thanks are also due to John Kerr, Jeremy Snowden <strong>and</strong> Louis Thomas for organis<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

collection of Scottish data. <strong>The</strong> work of Julie Bankes, Aimee Dawson, Fiona Hutson, Emma Maidment, Gillian Parish,<br />

Lynda Smith <strong>and</strong> Harley Stoddart is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks also go to the members of the Work<strong>in</strong>g Party on<br />

Pesticide Usage Surveys for their <strong>in</strong>valuable comments.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Anon. (2001a) Agricultural Statistics <strong>in</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Wales 1999. London: HMSO.<br />

Anon. (2001b) Agricultural Statistics, Scotl<strong>and</strong> 1999. Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh: HMSO.<br />

Anon. (2000a) Agricultural Statistics <strong>in</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Wales 1999. London: HMSO.<br />

Anon. (2000b) Agricultural Statistics, Scotl<strong>and</strong> 1999. Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh: HMSO.<br />

Chapman, P. J., Sly, J. M. A., Tucker, G. G. & Cutler, J. R. (1977) Pesticide Usage Survey Report 11 - Arable farm<br />

crops 1974. London: DEFRA.<br />

De’ath, A., Garthwaite, D. G., & Thomas, M. R. (1996) Pesticide Usage Survey Report 145 - <strong>Potato</strong> stores <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong><br />

Brita<strong>in</strong> 1996. London: DEFRA/SEERAD<br />

Fox, E., Garthwaite, D. G., & Thomas, M. R. (1998) Pesticide Usage Survey Report 161 - <strong>Potato</strong> stores <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong><br />

Brita<strong>in</strong> 1996. London: DEFRA/SEERAD<br />

Garthwaite, D. G. & Thomas, M. R. (1999) Pesticide Usage Survey Report 159 – Arable Farm Crops <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong><br />

1998. London: DEFRA/SEERAD<br />

Garthwaite, D. G. & Thomas, M. R. (2002) Pesticide Usage Survey Report 171 – Arable Farm Crops <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong><br />

2000. (<strong>in</strong> press)<br />

Goodw<strong>in</strong>, L. B. & Garthwaite, D. G. (1996) Pesticide Usage Survey Report 129 – <strong>Potato</strong> stores <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1994.<br />

London. DEFRA.<br />

Olney, N. J., Garthwaite, D. G. & Cotterill, N. D. (1992) Pesticide Usage Survey Report 92 - <strong>Potato</strong> stores <strong>in</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong><br />

& Wales 1988 & 1990. London: DEFRA.<br />

Olney, N. J. & Garthwaite, D. G. (1994) Pesticide Usage Survey Report 114 - <strong>Potato</strong> stores <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1992.<br />

London: DEFRA.<br />

Snowden, J. P., Bowen, H. M. & Dickson, J. M. (1989) Pesticide Usage Survey Report 73 - <strong>Potato</strong> <strong>in</strong> store 1986-87.<br />

Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh: SEERAD.<br />

Steed, J. M., Sly, J. M. A., Tucker, G. G. & Cutler, J. R. (1979) Pesticide Usage Survey Report 18 - Arable farm<br />

crops 1977. London: DEFRA.<br />

Thomas, M.R. (2001) Pesticide usage monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 45<br />

(supplement 1): S87-S93.<br />

Tucker, G. G. (1978) Survey of pesticide usage on potatoes stored from the 1975 crop. <strong>The</strong> Seed <strong>Potato</strong>, 18, No 1, pp 17<br />

- 22.<br />

20


PESTICIDE USAGE SURVEY REPORTS APPENDIX<br />

Surveys which <strong>in</strong>clude data relat<strong>in</strong>g to Scotl<strong>and</strong> are marked with *<br />

Surveys which <strong>in</strong>clude data relat<strong>in</strong>g to Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> are marked with #<br />

PUBLISHED REPORTS<br />

125 Rodenticide usage by Local Authorities <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1993/94* PB 2786 £4.00<br />

126 Aerial applications, <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1994* PB 2262 £7.00<br />

127 Arable farm crops <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1994* PB 2409 £4.00<br />

128 Soft fruit <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1994* PB 2787 £4.00<br />

129 <strong>Potato</strong> stores <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1994* PB 2788 £4.00<br />

130 Rodenticide usage on farms <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g arable crops 1994* PB 2789 £4.00<br />

131 Forestry, Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> 1993 # ISBN 1855272822<br />

132 Arable crops, Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> 1994 # ISBN 1855273144<br />

133 Aerial applications, <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1995* PB 2790 £4.00<br />

134 Outdoor vegetable crops <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1995* PB 2944 £4.00<br />

135 Mushrooms <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1995* PB 3341 £4.00<br />

136 Protected crops (edible <strong>and</strong> ornamental) <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1995 PB 3293 £4.00<br />

137 Farm gra<strong>in</strong> stores <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1994/95* PB 2946 £4.00<br />

138 Commercial gra<strong>in</strong> stores <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1994/95* PB 3522 £3.00<br />

139 Vegetable crops, Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> 1995 # ISBN 1855273462<br />

140 Mushroom crops, Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> 1995 # ISBN 1855273470<br />

141 Arable farm crops <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1996* PB 3330 £6.00<br />

142 Orchards <strong>and</strong> fruit stores <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1996* PB 3698 £4.00<br />

143 Hops 1996 PB 3801 £2.00<br />

144 Rodenticide usage on farms <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g arable crops 1996* PB 4243 £2.00<br />

145 <strong>Potato</strong> stores <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1996* PB 4187 £2.00<br />

148 Aerial applications, <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1996* PB 3699 £3.00<br />

149 Aerial applications, United K<strong>in</strong>gdom 1997* # PB 3802 £2.00<br />

150 Review of usage of pesticides <strong>in</strong> agriculture & horticulture throughout <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1986-1996* PB 4188 £2.00<br />

151 Grassl<strong>and</strong> & fodder crops <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1997* PB 4189 £3.00<br />

152 Hardy Nursery Stock <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1997* PB 4280 £3.00<br />

153 Outdoor bulbs & flowers <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1997* PB 4244 £2.00<br />

154 Rodenticide usage on farms <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g grassl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> fodder crops 1997* PB 4739 £2.00<br />

155 Rodenticide usage by Local Authorities <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1997* PB 5411 £3.00<br />

158 Aerial applications, <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1998* PB 4552 £3.00<br />

159 Arable farm crops <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1998* PB 4808 £4.50<br />

160 Soft fruit <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1998* PB 5412 £3.50<br />

161 <strong>Potato</strong> stores <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1998* PB 5413 £2.50<br />

164 Protected crops (edible <strong>and</strong> ornamental) <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1999* PB 6166 £3.50<br />

165 Mushroom crops <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1999* PB 6167 £1.00<br />

172 Orchards <strong>and</strong> fruit stores <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 2000* PB 6168 £1.50<br />

173 Hops <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 2000 PB 6169 £1.00<br />

179 Farm gra<strong>in</strong> stores <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1998/99* PB 6170 £1.00<br />

180 Commercial gra<strong>in</strong> stores <strong>in</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> 1998/99* PB 6171 £1.00<br />

Copies of reports categorised PB may be purchased from DEFRA Publications, London SE99 7TP (01645 556000).<br />

Copies of reports categorised ISBN may be obta<strong>in</strong>ed through Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!