PDF, GB, 56 p., 1,3 Mo - Femise

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The impact of the diagonal cumulation of Rules of Origin in the context of Euro-Med integration Michael Gasiorek (CARIS, United Kingdom) Patricia Augier (DEFI, France) Charles Lai-Tong, (GREQAM, France)
Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 3 2. Conceptual Background.................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Determining originating status .......................................................................................... 5 2.2 The impact of constraining ROOs on trade ..................................................................... 5 2.3 Cumulation and its impact on trade.................................................................................. 7 3. Sectoral gravity modeling of Rules of Origin ................................................................... 9 3.1 The gravity model .............................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Panel Estimation: difference in difference ..................................................................... 11 3.3 Results.............................................................................................................................. 14 3.4 Cumulation and external trade diversion ....................................................................... 16 4. What drives the significance of ROOs? ......................................................................... 19 4.1 Firm, sectoral, and country level characteristics ........................................................... 19 4.2 Estimating the importance of the key characteristics.................................................... 21 4.3 Results.............................................................................................................................. 24 4. Summary and Conclusion.......................................................................................... 28 5. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 29
Page 1: In collaboration with: F E M I S E
Page 5 and 6: to identify whether ROOs are indeed
Page 7 and 8: that can be use, or on the imported
Page 9 and 10: Mediterranean countries, which incl
Page 11 and 12: etween countries which are typicall
Page 13 and 14: 1.2 1.4 .8 1 1.1 .8 .9 1 322 323 .8
Page 15 and 16: 3.3 Results The principal results f
Page 17 and 18: Table 2: ROO+TD dummy by industry -
Page 19 and 20: still satisfying the originating re
Page 21 and 22: Sectoral level characteristics: •
Page 23 and 24: constraining rules of origin, we us
Page 25 and 26: Ceteris paribus, if the share of in
Page 27 and 28: positive, as would be expected, in
Page 29 and 30: 4. Summary and Conclusion In summar
Page 31 and 32: European Commission, (2003), Green
Page 33 and 34: The role of Rules of Origin in Egyp
Page 35 and 36: 1 Introduction The aim of this part
Page 37 and 38: and Morocco appear to have benefite
Page 39 and 40: Tunisia 21.4 20.1 40.7 15.2 2.5 11.
Page 41 and 42: Source: Obtained from www.capmas.go
Page 43 and 44: Hence, if you consider that bottom
Page 45 and 46: For the total of all manufacturing
Page 47 and 48: Total 29,305,151 14,425,977 43,731,
Page 49 and 50: obtained goods, exporting to only o
Page 51 and 52: 5 Appendix 1: Qualifying Industrial
Page 53 and 54:
6 Orouba Agrifoods Processing co. J
Page 55:
Shaded cells will be completed. (Th
show all

PDF, GB, 56 p., 1,3 Mo - Femise

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?