12.10.2013 Views

PDF, GB, 56 p., 1,3 Mo - Femise

PDF, GB, 56 p., 1,3 Mo - Femise

PDF, GB, 56 p., 1,3 Mo - Femise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

still satisfying the originating requirements. If this is correct, than one would also<br />

expect that the greater the impact of diagonal cumulation on spoke-spoke flows, the<br />

greater would be the impact of cumulation on RoW-Spoke flows. We explore this in<br />

the two figures below, where we plot the correlation between these two sets of<br />

coefficients for both Experiment 1 and Experiment 2. The results are again<br />

interesting. What we see, is that there is indeed a positive correlation, which again<br />

lends strong support to our interpretation that cumulation did not have a negative<br />

impact on RoW-Spoke trade, but a positive impact.<br />

Correlation between ROO and ROW-Spoke impacts<br />

(experiment 1)<br />

0.600<br />

0.500<br />

0.400<br />

0.300<br />

0.200<br />

0.100<br />

0.000<br />

-0.200 0.000 0.200 0.400 0.600 0.800<br />

-0.100<br />

Correlation between ROO and ROW-Spoke impacts<br />

(experiment 2)<br />

0.600<br />

0.500<br />

0.400<br />

0.300<br />

0.200<br />

0.100<br />

0.000<br />

-0.300 -0.200 -0.100 0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500<br />

-0.100<br />

-0.200

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!