Etudes par pays volume 2, PDF, 346 p., 1,4 Mo - Femise
Etudes par pays volume 2, PDF, 346 p., 1,4 Mo - Femise Etudes par pays volume 2, PDF, 346 p., 1,4 Mo - Femise
Rank Country CPI 2002 score Surveys used Standard deviation High-low Range 88 Kazakhstan 2.3 4 1.1 1.7 - 3.9 89 Bolivia 2.2 6 0.4 1.7 - 2.9 Cameroon 2.2 4 0.7 1.7 - 3.2 Ecuador 2.2 7 0.3 1.7 - 2.6 Haiti 2.2 3 1.7 0.8 - 4.0 93 Moldova 2.1 4 0.6 1.7 - 3.0 Uganda 2.1 4 0.3 1.9 - 2.6 95 Azerbaijan 2.0 4 0.3 1.7 - 2.4 96 Indonesia 1.9 12 0.6 0.8 - 3.0 Kenya 1.9 5 0.3 1.7 - 2.5 98 Angola 1.7 3 0.2 1.6 - 2.0 Madagascar 1.7 3 0.7 1.3 - 2.5 Paraguay 1.7 3 0.2 1.5 - 2.0 101 Nigeria 1.6 6 0.6 0.9 - 2.5 102 Bangladesh 1.2 5 0.7 0.3 - 2.0 Explanatory notes A more detailed description of the CPI methodology is available at http://www.transparency.org/cpi/index.html#cpi or at www.gwdg.de/~uwvw/2002.html A CPI 2002 Score relates to perceptions of the degree of corruption as seen by business people and risk analysts, and ranges between 10 (highly clean) and 0 (highly corrupt). A Surveys Used refers to the number of surveys that assessed a country’s performance. A total of 15 surveys were used from nine independent institutions, and at least three surveys were required for a country to be included in the CPI. Standard Deviation indicates differences in the values of the sources: the greater the standard deviation, the greater the differences of perceptions of a country among the sources. High-Low Range provides the highest and lowest values of the different sources Source: www.transparency.org
Table 26 Maternal Health Indicators, Egypt 2000 Indicator (% of ever married women 15 to 49) Urban Rural Total Care during pregnancy Anti Natal Care Any 71.2 47.2 52.9 Regular 56.2 32.8 36.7 One or more TT injection(s) 75.3 80.4 72.5 Other medical care 9.9 13.2 11.4 Any medical care 87.6 80.7 85.3 Pregnancy care indicator by background characteristics Weighed 75.6 48.5 59.6 Height measured 43.3 24.9 32.4 Blood pressure measured 76.1 46.2 58.4 Urine sample 63.6 33.4 45.7 Blood sample 64.1 34.3 46.5 Iron tablets/syrup 39.4 20.7 28.3 Told where to go for complications 22.6 14.6 17.9 Place of delivery Public health facility 33.4 15.2 22.2 Private health facility 36.4 19.4 26 At home 30 65.3 51.7 Other 0.1 0 0 Assistance during delivery Doctor 73.3 41 53.5 Trained 8.1 7 7.4 Birth attendant 17 47.1 35.5 Relative/other 1.1 3.3 2.5 No one 0.4 1.5 1.1 Postnatal care by background characteristics Delivered in facility 69.8 34.6 48.2 Had any postnatal checkup 2.5 5.4 4.3 Had checkup within 2 days of birth 0.6 1.5 1.1
- Page 25 and 26: 11873_02 Study D2: Poverty, Informa
- Page 27 and 28: 11873_02 Study D2: Poverty, Informa
- Page 29 and 30: 11873_02 Study D2: Poverty, Informa
- Page 31 and 32: 11873_02 Study D2: Poverty, Informa
- Page 33 and 34: 11873_02 Study D2: Poverty, Informa
- Page 35 and 36: 11873_02 Study D2: Poverty, Informa
- Page 37 and 38: 11873_02 Study D2: Poverty, Informa
- Page 39 and 40: 11873_02 Study D2: Poverty, Informa
- Page 41 and 42: 11873_02 Study D2: Poverty, Informa
- Page 43 and 44: 11873_02 Study D2: Poverty, Informa
- Page 45 and 46: 11873_02 Study D2: Poverty, Informa
- Page 47 and 48: 11873_02 Study D2: Poverty, Informa
- Page 49 and 50: 11873_02 Study D2: Poverty, Informa
- Page 51 and 52: 11873_02 Study D2: Poverty, Informa
- Page 53 and 54: 11873_02 Study D2: Poverty, Informa
- Page 55 and 56: 11873_02 Study D2: Poverty, Informa
- Page 57 and 58: 11873_02 Study D2: Poverty, Informa
- Page 59 and 60: APPENDIX
- Page 61 and 62: Table 2 - Population Distribution b
- Page 63 and 64: Table 7 Gross Domestic Product at F
- Page 65 and 66: Table 9 Investment and Saving durin
- Page 67 and 68: Table 12: Income, Distribution and
- Page 69 and 70: Table 15-c: Poverty measures by edu
- Page 71 and 72: Table 20 : Housing conditions by po
- Page 73 and 74: Table 24 The Number of Crimes Repor
- Page 75: Rank Country CPI 2002 score Surveys
- Page 79 and 80: JORDAN Royal Scientific Society
- Page 81 and 82: 11873_2002 Study D2: Poverty, Infor
- Page 83 and 84: 11873_2002 Study D2: Poverty, Infor
- Page 85 and 86: 11873_2002 Study D2: Poverty, Infor
- Page 87 and 88: 11873_2002 Study D2: Poverty, Infor
- Page 89 and 90: 11873_2002 Study D2: Poverty, Infor
- Page 91 and 92: 11873_2002 Study D2: Poverty, Infor
- Page 93 and 94: 11873_2002 Study D2: Poverty, Infor
- Page 95 and 96: 11873_2002 Study D2: Poverty, Infor
- Page 97 and 98: 11873_2002 Study D2: Poverty, Infor
- Page 99 and 100: 11873_2002 Study D2: Poverty, Infor
- Page 101 and 102: 11873_2002 Study D2: Poverty, Infor
- Page 103 and 104: 11873_2002 Study D2: Poverty, Infor
- Page 105 and 106: 11873_2002 Study D2: Poverty, Infor
- Page 107 and 108: 11873_2002 Study D2: Poverty, Infor
- Page 109 and 110: Population Projection 2000 - 2005 Y
- Page 111 and 112: Distribution of Population Living i
- Page 113 and 114: Total Jordanians Non jordanians Tot
- Page 115 and 116: Table 3 - Growth Rates of Economic
- Page 117 and 118: Contribution of Economic Sectors to
- Page 119 and 120: Table 1 Main Economic Indicators (C
- Page 121 and 122: Table 2 Expenditure on Gross Domest
- Page 123 and 124: Table 30 Components of Public Expen
- Page 125 and 126: Table 32 Outstanding External Publi
Rank Country<br />
CPI 2002<br />
score<br />
Surveys<br />
used<br />
Standard<br />
deviation<br />
High-low<br />
Range<br />
88 Kazakhstan 2.3 4 1.1 1.7 - 3.9<br />
89 Bolivia 2.2 6 0.4 1.7 - 2.9<br />
Cameroon 2.2 4 0.7 1.7 - 3.2<br />
Ecuador 2.2 7 0.3 1.7 - 2.6<br />
Haiti 2.2 3 1.7 0.8 - 4.0<br />
93 <strong>Mo</strong>ldova 2.1 4 0.6 1.7 - 3.0<br />
Uganda 2.1 4 0.3 1.9 - 2.6<br />
95 Azerbaijan 2.0 4 0.3 1.7 - 2.4<br />
96 Indonesia 1.9 12 0.6 0.8 - 3.0<br />
Kenya 1.9 5 0.3 1.7 - 2.5<br />
98 Angola 1.7 3 0.2 1.6 - 2.0<br />
Madagascar 1.7 3 0.7 1.3 - 2.5<br />
Paraguay 1.7 3 0.2 1.5 - 2.0<br />
101 Nigeria 1.6 6 0.6 0.9 - 2.5<br />
102 Bangladesh 1.2 5 0.7 0.3 - 2.0<br />
Explanatory notes<br />
A more detailed description of the CPI methodology is available at<br />
http://www.trans<strong>par</strong>ency.org/cpi/index.html#cpi or at www.gwdg.de/~uwvw/2002.html<br />
A CPI 2002 Score relates to perceptions of the degree of corruption as seen by business<br />
people and risk analysts, and ranges between 10 (highly clean) and 0 (highly corrupt).<br />
A Surveys Used refers to the number of surveys that assessed a country’s performance.<br />
A total of 15 surveys were used from nine independent institutions, and at least three<br />
surveys were required for a country to be included in the CPI.<br />
Standard Deviation indicates differences in the values of the sources: the greater the<br />
standard deviation, the greater the differences of perceptions of a country among the<br />
sources.<br />
High-Low Range provides the highest and lowest values of the different sources<br />
Source: www.trans<strong>par</strong>ency.org