12.10.2013 Views

PDF, GB, 139 p., 796 Ko - Femise

PDF, GB, 139 p., 796 Ko - Femise

PDF, GB, 139 p., 796 Ko - Femise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

simple average MFN for the sector has increased from 20.5% in 1999 to 25.5% in 2005.<br />

According to WTO (2006), average tariffs have increased for food manufacturing and<br />

preparations, but decreased for the beverage and tobacco industries. MFN tariffs are<br />

particularly high on dairy products (112.7% on average), manufacture of bakery products<br />

(60.9%) and meat products (50.3%). Tariff rates also feature a high dispersion, ranging from<br />

zero to 340% in the food industry and fruit and vegetables canning.<br />

Finally, it is interesting to note that regarding textiles and wearing apparel, the simple average<br />

applied MFN tariffs are at present "only" 7.7% (down from 12.5% in 1999) and 11.3% (down<br />

from 31.2% in 1999), respectively. As noted in much of the literature on Israel's trade policy,<br />

Israel has accepted since at least a decade that if textile and clothing firms are to survive under<br />

Israeli ownership and management they had to be "de-localized" to neighbouring countries<br />

such as Jordan and Egypt and some less developed East European countries (like Romania) .<br />

The process has taken place in an orderly way and is now almost completed. It is remarkable<br />

to note that whereas such a move has been accepted as a second best for the textiles and<br />

clothing industry, such is not the case neither for the agricultural nor for the food sectors.<br />

Apart from the old conventional argument that population dispersion is a defense imperative,<br />

something which was also true regarding textiles and clothing, there are two other possible<br />

reasons one can think about. One might be that small protected farms are partly in the hand of<br />

settlers in the West Bank, including the Jordan Valley (and until 2005 in the Gaza Strip).<br />

They have had a lot of clout in certain key political parties. Another reason for the high<br />

tariffs might be the fear of the government that lowering protection might leave without<br />

alternative employment the very poor Arab Israeli population in the Neguev desert, made up<br />

of Bedouin tribes. Such a move could lead to a nationalist uprising in Israel or to massive<br />

migration to urban suburbs in the centre of the country. So here the lobby in favour of<br />

maintaining protection would be the defense establishment and the intelligence services. The<br />

oligopolistic food industry had probably also played a role in lobbing for higher level of<br />

protection.<br />

Thus, it seems that the Israeli government was efficient - especially in comparison to other<br />

MPCs - in implementing gradual, mostly unilateral, liberalization of its trade policy regime.<br />

Agriculture is the only major exception to the liberalization tendency. This trend reflects<br />

mainly a broad consensus among major political parties in Israel in pursuing liberal trade<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!