PDF, GB, 139 p., 796 Ko - Femise
PDF, GB, 139 p., 796 Ko - Femise
PDF, GB, 139 p., 796 Ko - Femise
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
and between 157% and 247% in 2004. These horrendous rates are there to protect not only<br />
small family farms but also moshavim (production cooperatives) and kibbutzim (communes).<br />
Tariff quotas apply to 12 product groups although for most of these products the in-quota<br />
tariff rate is above the MFN applied rate, thus rendering the quota redundant (WTO 2006).<br />
When it is not, there is obviously some scope for lobbying the Ministries of Agriculture and<br />
Rural Development (for agricultural products and fresh food) and Industry, Trade, and Labour<br />
(for processed food) which are the ones in charge of the administration of those quotas. They<br />
apply among others to imports of prunes, walnuts, sweet corn, and concentrated citrus fruit.<br />
Another protection measure for agriculture were variable import levies applied to imports of<br />
basic products like sugar, pasta, sunflower seeds, jams, fruits, wine, cheese and frozen fish<br />
(WTO, 1999). At the end of 1990’s, in accordance with the WTO Agreement on Agriculture,<br />
all variable levies were eliminated. Now, Israel applies tariff quotas to 12 product groups<br />
(nuts, corns, orange juice, sheep and goat milk and cheese). “However, for most of these<br />
products the in-quota tariff rate is above the MFN applied rate, thus rendering the quota<br />
redundant. 52 As a result, these tariff quotas are in general overfilled” (WTO, 2006, p. 63). On<br />
the other hand, note that some of the PTAs signed by Israel with third countries offer the latter<br />
some tariff preferences (generally within a quota). For instance, in 1996 Israel and the US<br />
signed an agricultural trade accord aimed at including the remaining goods not covered by the<br />
1985 FTA agreement. Accordingly, agricultural imports from the USA were entitled to a<br />
preference of 10 percent (USDA, 2005). This implies, of course, devastating trade diversion<br />
against non-preferred countries, such as Argentina.<br />
A second sector deserving particular attention covers food, beverages and tobacco industries.<br />
In 2002, it accounted for about 15% of industrial production; it was the second largest<br />
employer in the industrial sector with more than 16% of industrial employment in 2004. The<br />
sector exhibits an oligopolistic market structure, especially in the case of tobacco products,<br />
soft drinks, fresh juices and wines. According to the political economy models oligopolistic<br />
structure favours the emergence and operation of lobbies. The industries are mostly oriented<br />
towards the domestic market, with exports representing only 6% of production or less. The<br />
52<br />
In principle “in quota” tariff rates should be below MFN rates in order to enable a minimum level of imports<br />
to a protected market.<br />
96