12.10.2013 Views

PDF, GB, 139 p., 796 Ko - Femise

PDF, GB, 139 p., 796 Ko - Femise

PDF, GB, 139 p., 796 Ko - Femise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Working hypotheses<br />

Nine hypotheses will be presented; each one is derived from either theoretical literature or<br />

historical analysis. Some arguments are given exogenously, such as the level of development<br />

or the level of democracy, since it is unlikely that any of these two are going to change<br />

significantly in the near future, while others relate directly to the regulatory environment of<br />

conducting business. Data sources for each variable used in the testing of the hypotheses are<br />

fully documented in the appendix B.<br />

Hypothesis 1: Corruption is lower in higher economically developed countries<br />

The economic linkage between the economic development and corruption suggested by the<br />

literature is undeniable. Corrupt deal exposure is much more probable in more economically<br />

developed countries. In addition to its clear impact on democracy, economic development<br />

improves the spread of education, literacy, and depersonalizes economical relationships —<br />

each of these ought to increase the likelihood that a misuse of public power will be detected<br />

and tackled. Therefore, the first hypothesis is that corruption will decline as the economic<br />

development improves. Note that the index of corruption is calculated with higher values<br />

pertaining to cleaner governments; hence, a strong positive relation is expected.<br />

Hypothesis 2: Stable democratic institutions and corruption are expected to be positively<br />

correlated<br />

Democracy is a complex phenomenon, involving not just a single attribute but a<br />

complementary set of characteristics including free and fair elections, the rule of law, respect<br />

for human and civil rights, active citizen participation in the political process. The common<br />

argument in favour of democracy connects democracy with citizens’ freedom, the availability<br />

of information on examples of corruption and the voice to protest against it. Moreover, there<br />

is a significant coincidence of free markets and democracies. Even though there are some<br />

cases of spread of corruption in fresh democracies, the consolidation of democratic<br />

institutions reduces corruption in the long run. Many researchers suggest that electoral<br />

competition, checks, and balances associated with consolidated democratic systems facilitate<br />

a public scrutiny that impedes politicians’ wants for private gains as they risk losing elections<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!