BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV 2012- IN THE MATTER ...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV 2012- IN THE MATTER ...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV 2012- IN THE MATTER ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>BEFORE</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong><strong>ENV</strong>IRONMENT</strong> <strong>COURT</strong><br />
To: The Registrar<br />
Environment Court<br />
PO Box 5027<br />
DX:SX11154<br />
Wellington<br />
<strong>ENV</strong> <strong>2012</strong>-<br />
<strong>IN</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>MATTER</strong> of the Resource Management<br />
Act 1991<br />
AND<br />
<strong>IN</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>MATTER</strong> of an appeal pursuant to clause<br />
14(1) of the First Schedule of<br />
the Act<br />
BETWEEN FEDERATED FARMERS OF<br />
NEW ZEALAND<br />
Appellant<br />
AND RUAPEHU DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />
Respondent<br />
_______________________________________________________<br />
NOTICE OF APPEAL TO <strong><strong>ENV</strong>IRONMENT</strong> <strong>COURT</strong><br />
AGA<strong>IN</strong>ST DECISION ON PROPOSED DISTRICT PLAN<br />
Clause 14(1) of First Schedule, Resource Management Act 1991<br />
Federated Farmers of New Zealand<br />
_______________________________________________________<br />
Federated Farmers of New Zealand, appeal against a decision of Ruapehu District Council on the<br />
following plan change:<br />
Ruapehu District Plan<br />
Federated Farmers of New Zealand made a submission on that plan change.<br />
Federated Farmers of New Zealand is not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308D of the<br />
Resource Management Act 1991.<br />
Federated Farmers received notice of the decision on 14 December 2011.<br />
Federated Farmers appeal to the Ruapehu District Plan 1
The decision was made by Ruapehu District Council.<br />
The decision that Federated Farmers of New Zealand is appealing is:<br />
Summary of the decision specific provision or matter<br />
Definition: Factory Farming and Animal Boarding Facility<br />
Submission 284.3<br />
Buffer Zone: Issue RU2.4 and associated policy stream, Rule RU3.2.3, Rule SU3.2.1.3 and RU3.5<br />
Assessment Criteria<br />
Submission 284.13<br />
Riparian Management: RP2.4 Public Access<br />
Submission 284.27<br />
Rural Zone: RU3.3.1 Front Yard<br />
Submission 284.44<br />
Rural Zone: RU3.3.3 Density<br />
Submission: 284.45<br />
Rural Zone: RU 3.3.5 Noise<br />
Submission 284.46<br />
Rural Zone: RU3.4.6 Extraction Activities<br />
Submission 284.49 and 284.50<br />
Rural Zone: RU3.4.13 Airport Activities<br />
Submission 284.57 and 284.58<br />
Road Transport: Vehicle Access Separation TI3.3.2<br />
Submission 284.59<br />
Hazardous Substances: HS3.2.1 List of Permitted Activities<br />
Submission 284.67<br />
Summary of reasons for the appeal<br />
Definition: Factory Farming and Animal Boarding Facility<br />
Submission 284.3<br />
Council decision was to accept this submission in part.<br />
Federated Farmers is concerned that the definition of factory farming includes outdoor enclosures<br />
which could also include paddocks. Federated Farmers believes that farming in paddocks is not<br />
factory farming and therefore the definition could inhibit normal farming practices.<br />
Relief sought<br />
That the definition be replaced with the definition we provided in our submission:<br />
Includes any agricultural production which results in the creation of living matter and which is carried<br />
out primarily within buildings, including but not limited to such activities as intensive poultry farming<br />
(excluding low density free range poultry or the keeping of fewer than 20 birds), boarding kennels<br />
Federated Farmers appeal to the Ruapehu District Plan 2
and catteries, rabbit or fitch farming, intensive pig farming or mushroom production. For the purpose<br />
of this Plan ‘factory farming’ excludes horticulture.<br />
Intensive pig farming means the keeping, breeding or rearing for any purpose of more than five pigs<br />
that have been weaned, or more than two sows, where the predominant productive processes are<br />
carried out within buildings or closely fenced outdoor runs where the stocking density precludes the<br />
maintenance of pasture or ground cover but excludes non-intensive pig farming.<br />
Intensive poultry farming means the keeping, rearing or breeding of 20 or more poultry, whether in<br />
relation to the production of poultry for human consumption or in relation to egg production, where<br />
the predominant productive processes are carried out primarily within buildings and includes freerange<br />
poultry farming activities, but excludes low density free-range poultry.<br />
Low density free range poultry means the keeping, rearing or breeding of poultry (whether for the<br />
purpose of raising poultry for human consumption or for egg production) where:<br />
a) birds have permanent access to open air runs;<br />
b) permanent vegetation cover exists on the land where birds are permitted to range;<br />
c) the stocking rate of the runs to which the birds have access does not exceed 1.5 per square metre;<br />
and<br />
d) the stocking rate of any permanent weatherproof shelter to which birds have access does not<br />
exceed 5 birds per square metre of deep litter floor space or 10 birds per square metre of<br />
slatted floor space or 13 birds per square metre on framed perches.<br />
Non-intensive pig farming means the keeping, breeding or rearing for any purpose, of pigs on pasture<br />
(but including areas used for access to shelter) at a stocking density that sustains the maintenance of<br />
pasture or ground cover.<br />
Buffer Zone: Issue RU2.4 and associated policy stream, Rule RU3.2.3, Rule SU3.2.1.3 and RU3.5<br />
Assessment Criteria<br />
Submission 284.13<br />
Council decision was to reject this submission.<br />
Federated Farmers believes that the buffer zone is a blunt tool to achieve ensure consultation with<br />
the Department of Conservation when development is occurring. Federated Farmers and the<br />
Department of Conservation undertook pre-hearing discussions and came to an agreed viewpoint<br />
which was presented at the hearing but ignored by Council. Federated Farmers believes that the<br />
Department of Conservation was comfortable that our shared position would allow them the level of<br />
comfort they required to ensure they were consulted regarding development which could affect<br />
important conservation estate.<br />
Relief sought<br />
Federated Farmers appeal to the Ruapehu District Plan 3
That all buffer zone provisions are removed but that assessment criteria for Restricted Discretionary,<br />
Discretionary and Non-Complying Activities remains for industrial activity, exploration activity,<br />
extraction activity, prospecting activity, transfer station activity and subdivision activity to ensure<br />
that potential impacts upon the identified conservation land are considered. This would involve<br />
amendments as follows:<br />
RURAL<br />
RU3.2.3 Discretionary Activities<br />
The following activities are Discretionary Activities.<br />
(g) Development within 500m of identified Conservation Land<br />
Any of the following activities (excluding rural activities, or residential activities located<br />
on a building platform approved as part of a subdivision consent under Rule SU3.2.1.3<br />
of this District Plan) listed within:<br />
(iii) Rule RU3.2.1’Permitted Activities’<br />
(iv) Rule RU3.2.2 ‘Controlled Activities’;<br />
(i) Industrial Activity<br />
(ii) Exploration Activity<br />
(iii) Extraction Activity<br />
(iv) Prospecting Activity<br />
(v) Transfer Station Activity<br />
that are located within 500m of the following areas:<br />
Otamarautara Stream Scenic Reserve<br />
Pukepoto Ecological Area<br />
Erua Forest Sanctuary<br />
Waimarino Scientific Reserve<br />
Tongariro National Park<br />
Pokaka Scenic Reserve<br />
Rangataua No.2 Conservation Area<br />
Mangamingi Stream Conservation Area<br />
Tongariro Conservation Area<br />
Rangataua Conservation Area<br />
Erua Conservation Area<br />
Pureora Forest Park (and public conservation land contiguous with the Park)<br />
Advice Note:<br />
These areas are shown on the District Plan Maps, with a 500m buffer around them.<br />
DOC will be considered an affected party for any application submitted. It is<br />
recommended that evidence of consultation with DOC is provided with any such<br />
application under the above rule.<br />
RU3.5 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA<br />
RU3.5.1 Restricted Discretionary, Discretionary and Non-Complying Activities<br />
Federated Farmers appeal to the Ruapehu District Plan 4
Restricted Discretionary Activities will be assessed only in respect of the Relevant Assessment Criteria<br />
applicable to the Conditions with which the activity was unable to comply. Discretionary and Non-<br />
Complying Activities will be assessed against, but not limited to, the assessment criteria below.<br />
(d) Development affecting Adjoining identified Conservation Land<br />
• Otamarautara Stream Scenic Reserve<br />
• Pukepoto Ecological Area<br />
• Erua Forest Sanctuary<br />
• Waimarino Scientific Reserve<br />
• Tongariro National Park<br />
• Pokaka Scenic Reserve<br />
• Rangataua No.2 Conservation Area<br />
• Mangamingi Stream Conservation Area<br />
• Tongariro Conservation Area<br />
• Rangataua Conservation Area<br />
• Erua Conservation Area<br />
• Pureora Forest Park (and public conservation land contiguous with the Park)<br />
(referred to in RU3.2.3(fg) (applies to industrial activity, exploration activity, extraction activity,<br />
prospecting activity, transfer station activity and subdivision activity)<br />
(i) Whether any development adjoining these areas, has been designed in a manner that will<br />
not detract from the valued characteristics of the area (including but not limited to the design<br />
and location of dwellings or structures, orientation and layout of subdivisions, and any<br />
covenants and consent notices proposed as part of a subdivision).<br />
(ii) Whether a landscape mitigation plan has been provided to ensure the adverse visual effects<br />
of the proposal when viewed from these identified areas, are avoided or mitigated to minor<br />
levels.<br />
(iii) The impact of the development, and subsequent use, on biodiversity values. Specific<br />
consideration will be given to measures proposed to ensure pest plant and animal species are<br />
not introduced into Conservation Land as a result of the development, along with measures to<br />
ensure that stormwater and wastewater do not affect water quality.<br />
(iv) Whether the Department of Conservation has been consulted with regarding the<br />
development, and the outcome of that consultation.<br />
Subdivision<br />
SU3.2.1.3 Non-Complying Activities<br />
The following activities are Non-Complying Activities:<br />
(d) Any subdivision with a complying building platform within 500 metres of Tongariro<br />
National Park. the following areas:<br />
Otamarautara Stream Scenic Reserve<br />
Pukepoto Ecological Area<br />
Erua Forest Sanctuary<br />
Federated Farmers appeal to the Ruapehu District Plan 5
Waimarino Scientific Reserve<br />
Tongariro National Park<br />
Pokaka Scenic Reserve<br />
Rangataua No.2 Conservation Area<br />
Mangamingi Stream Conservation Area<br />
Tongariro Conservation Area<br />
Rangataua Conservation Area<br />
Erua Conservation Area<br />
Pureora Forest Park (and public conservation land contiguous with<br />
the Park)<br />
Advice Note:<br />
These areas are Tongariro National Park is shown on the District Plan Maps, with a<br />
500m buffer around it them.<br />
DOC will be considered an affected party for any application submitted under the above<br />
rule. It is recommended that evidence of consultation with DOC is provided with any<br />
such application.<br />
Relevant Objectives and Policies - RU2.4.2(a) and RU2.4.3(a)<br />
Riparian Management: RP2.4 Public Access<br />
Submission 284.27<br />
Council decision was to reject the submission.<br />
Federated Farmers has concerns with Issue RP2.4. In some instances public access can actually be<br />
detrimental to the natural character and ecological wellbeing of the water body. Further, there is no<br />
legal requirement for public access to areas of significant value on privately owned land. Access<br />
must be negotiated with the landowner and there must be no presumption of public access.<br />
Considering the significant costs associated with maintenance it is inappropriate to facilitate public<br />
access without a robust cost benefit analyse.<br />
Also, in many cases paper roads already provide public access water bodies.<br />
Relief sought<br />
That Issue RP 2.4 be amended as follows:<br />
(a) Facilitate public access where a demand exists to and along waterways in a manner that<br />
protects their natural character and the property rights of adjoining landowners and where<br />
paper roads do not already provide said demand. (or words to that effect)<br />
Rural Zone: RU3.3.1 Front Yard<br />
Submission 284.44<br />
Council decision was to reject the submission<br />
Federated Farmers appeal to the Ruapehu District Plan 6
Federated Farmers is concerned that by not allowing farm sheds and structures to be located next to<br />
the road it will negatively impact farming operations. Often it is difficult, if not impossible to get<br />
stock trucks or other delivery / pick up vehicles into a property. It is therefore important that farm<br />
sheds be located directly next to the road so that farmers may have their stock transported. Further<br />
to this, appropriate building sites are often limited in rural hill country and the best sites are likely to<br />
be located next to the road where the most favourable topography exists.<br />
Relief sought<br />
That RU3.3.1 (a) and (b) be amended as follows:<br />
(a) For sites of 3000m² in area or greater, all buildings, shall be setback a minimum of 10 metres<br />
from the front boundary adjoining a local road or collector road. Farm sheds are exempt from Front<br />
Yard restrictions.<br />
(b) For sites of 3000m² in area or greater, all buildings, shall be setback a minimum of 30 metres<br />
from the front boundary adjoining any road other than a local road or collector road. Farm sheds are<br />
exempt from Front Yard restrictions.<br />
Rural Zone: RU3.3.3 Density<br />
Submission: 284.45<br />
Council decision was to reject the submission<br />
Much of the rural hill country is limited in appropriate building sites and therefore it is necessary to<br />
to concentrate dwellings where the topography is most suitable.<br />
Federated Farmers believes that having one dwelling per 50 hectares over 100 hectares is<br />
appropriate when the adverse effects are no greater than having two dwellings on a 100 hectare<br />
site.<br />
Relief sought<br />
That RU3.3.3 (d) be amended as follows:<br />
(d) Not more than two dwellings shall be erected on any one site with an area of less than 100<br />
hectares and no more than four one dwelling shall be erected for every 50ha (or part thereof) on any<br />
one site with an area of 100 hectares or more.<br />
Rural Zone: RU 3.3.5 Noise<br />
Submission 284.46<br />
Council decision was to reject the submission<br />
Federated Farmers appeal to the Ruapehu District Plan 7
Federated Farmers supported the exemptions list of example “normal seasonal rural activities” but<br />
believe it should be extended to also include milking, feeding out, top dressing, calf and lamb<br />
weaning and fertiliser application, all of which have the potential to create noise but are normal<br />
rural activities which should be expected in the rural zone.<br />
Relief sought<br />
That RU3.3.5(a) be amended as follows:<br />
(iii) Normal seasonal rural activities such as harvesting, or haymaking, milking, feeding out, calf<br />
weaning, and lamb weaning and fertiliser application including top dressing may exceed the noise<br />
control rule.<br />
Road Transport: Vehicle Access Separation TI3.3.2<br />
Submission 284.59<br />
Council decision was to reject the submission.<br />
Federated Farmers believes it is unfair to apply minimum vehicle access separation distances to<br />
paddocks. Paddocks are usually not designed for regular access and are not always placed where it is<br />
possible or appropriate to create an access which meets the minimum vehicle access separation.<br />
Relief sought<br />
Insert TI 3.3.2 (c)<br />
These rules do not apply to accesses used infrequently such as to farm paddocks (or words to that<br />
effect).<br />
Hazardous Substances: HS3.2.1 List of Permitted Activities<br />
Submission 284.67<br />
Council decision was to reject the submission.<br />
Federated Farmers is very concerned that HS3.2.1 does not allow for the normal fertiliser and<br />
agrichemical storage for typical farming operations.<br />
An example of a fertilizer which would be captured by the HSNO subclasses 6.3B and 6.4A of<br />
Appendix 3 is urea. Urea is extremely common and has been safely used as a nitrogen fertilizer for<br />
generations, however under the proposed Plan its storage in typical farm quantities would be a<br />
discretionary activity.<br />
Federated Farmers appeal to the Ruapehu District Plan 8
Federated Farmers is of the opinion that where a New Zealand Standards approved Code of Practice<br />
has been developed and where compliance can be demonstrated that fertiliser and agrichemical<br />
storage should be a permitted activity. In regard to the use, storage and disposal of agriculture<br />
chemicals the NZS 8409:2004 has been developed for the agrichemical users and developed to meet<br />
the requirements of both the HSNO and RMA. This would provide a valid alternative for landowners<br />
to demonstrate compliance with the District Plan.<br />
Further to this, we submit that it is inappropriate to try and quantify an appropriate storage limit for<br />
farms as circumstances vary greatly. What is more important than the amount of hazardous<br />
substance being stored is that the substance is being stored and used appropriately. This is why<br />
compliance with NZS8409:2004 would be more suitable than a storage limit.<br />
Relief sought<br />
That HS3.2.1 Permitted Activities be amended as follows:<br />
The following activities are Permitted Activities provided they comply with the General Conditions<br />
outlined in section HS3.3.<br />
(d) Agrichemical use, storage and disposal where these activities are carried out in accordance with<br />
NZS8409:2004 Management of Agrichemicals (or words to this effect)<br />
I attach the following documents to this notice:<br />
(a) a copy of my submission (Appendix A)<br />
(b) a copy of the relevant decision (or part of the decision) (Appendix B)<br />
(c) any other documents necessary for an adequate understanding of the appeal<br />
(d) a list of names and addresses of persons to be served with a copy of this notice (Appendix C)<br />
Address for service of appellant:<br />
Kelly Martyn<br />
Regional Policy Advisor<br />
Federated Farmers of New Zealand<br />
PO Box 422<br />
New Plymouth<br />
____________________________________<br />
Kelly Martyn<br />
for Federated Farmers of New Zealand<br />
DATE: 17 February <strong>2012</strong><br />
Federated Farmers appeal to the Ruapehu District Plan 9
Telephone: (06) 757 3425<br />
Fax: (06) 757 3424<br />
Email: kmartyn@fedfarm.org.nz<br />
Advice to recipients of copy of notice of appeal<br />
How to become party to proceedings<br />
You may become a party to the appeal if you made a submission on the matter of this appeal; and<br />
you lodge a notice of your wish to be a party to the proceedings (in form 33) with the Environment<br />
Court within 15 working days after the period for lodging a notice of appeal ends.<br />
You may apply to the Environment Court under section 281 of the Resource Management Act 1991<br />
for a waiver of the above timing requirements (see form 38).<br />
How to obtain copies of documents relating to the appeal<br />
The copy of this notice served on you does not attach a copy of the appellant’s submission or the<br />
decision (or part of the decision) appealed. These documents may be obtained, on request, from the<br />
appellant.<br />
The copy of this notice served on you does not attach a copy of any other documents necessary for<br />
the adequate understanding of the appeal (of which there were none), or a list of names and<br />
addresses of persons to be served with a copy of this notice. These documents may be obtained, on<br />
request, from the appellant.<br />
Advice<br />
If you have any questions about this notice, contact the Environment Court Unit of the Department<br />
for Courts in Auckland, Wellington or Christchurch.<br />
Federated Farmers appeal to the Ruapehu District Plan 10
Persons to be served with a copy of this notice:<br />
Kate Dahm<br />
Ruapehu District Council<br />
Private Bag 1001<br />
TAUMARUNUI 3946<br />
kate.dahm@ruapehudc.govt.nz<br />
Ashley Cole<br />
Murumuru Farms Limited<br />
Ruatiti<br />
RAETIHI 4696<br />
ash.ash@xtra.co.nz<br />
Horticulture New Zealand<br />
Chris Keenan - Manager - Resource Management and Environment<br />
PO Box 10232<br />
The Terrace<br />
WELL<strong>IN</strong>GTON 6143<br />
chris.keenan@hortnz.co.nz<br />
Ernslaw One Ltd<br />
Richard Heikell<br />
PO Box 2042<br />
GISBORNE 4040<br />
Richard.heikell@ernslaw.co.nz<br />
NZ Forest Managers Ltd<br />
Jackie Egan<br />
PO Box 304<br />
TURANGI 3353<br />
jackie@nzfm.co.nz<br />
Hancock Forest Management (NZ) Ltd<br />
Sally Strang<br />
PO Box 648<br />
Braeside Avenue<br />
TOKOROA 3444<br />
Sstrang@hnrg.com<br />
David Holland<br />
PO Box 10003<br />
Bayfair<br />
TAURANGA 3152<br />
djeholland@gmail.com<br />
New Zealand Fire Service Commission<br />
C/- Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd: ATTN: Alexandra Rielly<br />
PO Box 3942<br />
WELL<strong>IN</strong>GTON 6011<br />
Appendix C<br />
Federated Farmers appeal to the Ruapehu District Plan 11
NZ Transport Agency (NZTA)<br />
ATTN: Jeff Mitchell-Anyon<br />
PO Box 345<br />
WANGANUI 4540<br />
Jeff.Mitchell-Anyon@nzta.govt.nz<br />
Genesis Energy<br />
Jeremy Stevenson-Wright<br />
PO Box 10568<br />
The Terrace<br />
WELL<strong>IN</strong>GTON 6143<br />
Craig.mckibbin@mitchellpartnerships.co.nz<br />
Tukia Group Ltd<br />
C/- NZ Forest Managers Ltd - ATTN: John Hura<br />
PO Box 304<br />
TURANGI 3353<br />
john@nzfm.co.nz<br />
Winstone Pulp International<br />
Susan Bramley<br />
PO Box 48<br />
OHAKUNE 4660<br />
susan.bramley@wpi-international.co.nz<br />
Rural Community Group<br />
P John Chuman<br />
1125 Erua Road<br />
NATIONAL PARK 3984<br />
johnaterua@hotmail.com<br />
P John Chuman<br />
1125 Erua Road<br />
NATIONAL PARK 3984<br />
johnaterua@hotmail.com<br />
Velma Siemonek<br />
PO Box 32<br />
NATIONAL PARK 3948<br />
d.v.siemonek.erua@hotmail.com<br />
Donald Leslie Siemonek<br />
PO Box 32<br />
NATIONAL PARK 3948<br />
d.v.siemonek.erua@hotmail.com<br />
Bryan Finnerty<br />
Erua Lodge & The Crossing Backpackers<br />
PO Box 35<br />
NATIONAL PARK 3948<br />
bryan@erualodge.co.nz<br />
Federated Farmers appeal to the Ruapehu District Plan 12
Miriam Gillingham<br />
Erua Lodge & The Crossing Backpackers<br />
PO Box 35<br />
NATIONAL PARK 3948<br />
miriam@erualodge.co.nz<br />
Adventure Headquarters<br />
Paul Ratlidge<br />
PO Box 94<br />
NATIONAL PARK 3948<br />
info@adventurehq.co.nz<br />
Property Rights in New Zealand Inc<br />
C/- D Coles, Chairman<br />
4545 Highway 22<br />
RD2<br />
HUNTLY 3772<br />
donald.p.coles@gmail.com<br />
Robert & Shona Forbes<br />
PO Box 7<br />
NATIONAL PARK 3948<br />
royturner.ski@xtra.co.nz<br />
National Park Community Board<br />
Chairperson Shona Forbes<br />
C/- Ruapehu District Council<br />
Private Bag 1001<br />
TAUMARUNUI 3946<br />
royturner.ski@xtra.co.nz<br />
David Griffiths<br />
PO Box 24<br />
TURANGI 3353<br />
griffsjd@yahoo.com<br />
Alan & Julie Whale<br />
C/- Aimee Barwick<br />
65 Parr Terrace<br />
Castor Bay<br />
North Shore<br />
AUCKLAND 0620<br />
lambrown@woosh.co.nz<br />
Tuwharetoa Maori Trust Board<br />
C/- Sean te Heuheu<br />
PO Box 87<br />
TURANGI 3353<br />
sean@tuwharetoa.co.nz<br />
Federated Farmers appeal to the Ruapehu District Plan 13
Murray Horn<br />
PO Box 849<br />
NEW PLYMOUTH 4615<br />
m.j.h@bigpond.net.au<br />
Kathleen Murdoch<br />
203 Miro Street<br />
MANUNUI 3924<br />
katydid1165@gmail.com<br />
WM & CE O'Donnell<br />
Treadwell Gordon<br />
PO Box 4084<br />
WANGANUI 4541<br />
Winston Oliver<br />
Ruatiti Airstrip Committee<br />
29 Makino Road<br />
RD6<br />
RAETIHI 4696<br />
Steve Fahey & Joss Richardson<br />
C/- Cheal Consultants - ATTN: Ella Bacher<br />
PO Box 165<br />
TAUPO 3351<br />
ellab@cheal.co.nz<br />
Ian Shaw<br />
C/- Cheal Consultants - ATTN: Ella Bacher<br />
PO Box 165<br />
TAUPO 3330<br />
ellab@cheal.co.nz<br />
Michael Plowman<br />
RD2<br />
OWHANGO 3990<br />
s.plowman@xtra.co.nz<br />
Tuwharetoa Maori Trust Board<br />
C/- Sean te Heuheu<br />
PO Box 87<br />
TURANGI 3353<br />
sean@tuwharetoa.co.nz<br />
The Department of Conservation<br />
Nicola Etheridge<br />
Private Bag<br />
TURANGI 3353<br />
netheridge@doc.govt.nz<br />
Federated Farmers appeal to the Ruapehu District Plan 14
Sharon Adams<br />
RD1<br />
OWHANGO 3989<br />
ss.adams@xtra.co.nz<br />
SE Williams<br />
2264 State Highway 4<br />
RD1<br />
OWHANGO 3989<br />
williams2007@xtra.co.nz<br />
Angela Fergusson<br />
32 Falkner Park<br />
TAUMARUNUI 3920<br />
Andrew Harland<br />
CMB 98<br />
OWHANGO 3990<br />
andrewharland@actrix.co.nz<br />
Jeremy Stubbs<br />
C/- PO Box 364<br />
TAUMARUNUI 3946<br />
jeremy@peakca.co.nz<br />
Earl Rutherford & Brenda Solon<br />
39A Townsend Road<br />
Mirimar<br />
WELL<strong>IN</strong>GTON 6022<br />
Frank Taylor<br />
54 Goldfinch Street<br />
OHAKUNE 4625<br />
Vivien L Pohl<br />
58 Norton Park Avenue<br />
LOWER HUTT 5011<br />
p.pohl@orcon.net.nz<br />
JM Duff<br />
27 Onge Street<br />
OWHANGO 3990<br />
judithduff@orcon.net.nz<br />
Elizabeth Ellicock<br />
15 Lairdvale Road<br />
TAUMARUNUI 3920<br />
CRS & LA Lagocki<br />
243 Taupo Road<br />
TAUMARUNUI 3920<br />
Federated Farmers appeal to the Ruapehu District Plan 15
Farina Brady<br />
PO Box 147<br />
OHAKUNE 4660<br />
farinabrady@gmail.com<br />
Donald Borck<br />
RD4<br />
Taringamotu<br />
TAUMARUNUI 3994<br />
Christina Borck<br />
RD4<br />
Taringamotu<br />
TAUMARUNUI 3994<br />
Chevington Trust<br />
Terry Jones<br />
25 Rowan Road<br />
Epsom<br />
AUCKLAND 1023<br />
terry@uccl.co.nz<br />
Annette Eileen Mason<br />
PO Box 90094<br />
Victoria Street West<br />
AUCKLAND 1142<br />
Tania Taylor<br />
PO Box 76<br />
OHAKUNE 4660<br />
tarnzz@hotmail.com<br />
Denise Blair<br />
496 Waikaka Road<br />
MATIERE 3995<br />
AR & AC Aanensen<br />
50 Harvey Street<br />
TAUPO 3330<br />
Bryan M McAnnalley<br />
RD2<br />
OWHANGO 3990<br />
Rodney Blackburn<br />
73 Fisher Road<br />
NATIONAL PARK 3948<br />
rodneydaniel76@hotmail.com<br />
DJ Blackburn<br />
73 Fisher Road<br />
NATIONAL PARK 3948<br />
starlet01@msn.com<br />
Federated Farmers appeal to the Ruapehu District Plan 16
SR Blackburn<br />
73 Fisher Road<br />
NATIONAL PARK 3948<br />
srb011@msn.com<br />
Miriam Gillingham<br />
Erua Lodge & The Crossing Backpackers<br />
PO Box 35<br />
NATIONAL PARK 3948<br />
miriam@erualodge.co.nz<br />
CC & NM Gebbie Ltd<br />
Chris Gebbie<br />
1-7 Millar Street<br />
NATIONAL PARK 3948<br />
chrisgebbie@xtra.co.nz<br />
Ruapehu Property.com Ltd<br />
Chris Gebbie<br />
1-7 Millar Street<br />
NATIONAL PARK 3948<br />
chrisgebbie@xtra.co.nz<br />
Hakan Svensson<br />
PO Box 43<br />
NATIONAL PARK 3948<br />
mountainheights@xtra.co.nz<br />
David Brown<br />
C/- Aimee Barwick<br />
65 Parr Terrace<br />
Castor Bay<br />
North Shore<br />
AUCKLAND 0620<br />
lambrown@woosh.co.nz<br />
Federated Farmers appeal to the Ruapehu District Plan 17