12.10.2013 Views

Submission on Draft Land Transport Rule, Agricultural Vehicles ...

Submission on Draft Land Transport Rule, Agricultural Vehicles ...

Submission on Draft Land Transport Rule, Agricultural Vehicles ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.22 Pilot vehicle requirements<br />

4.23 Federated Farmers supports the proposal to relax the requirements for agricultural<br />

motor vehicles travelling in a c<strong>on</strong>voy to be accompanied by a Class 2 pilot vehicle.<br />

4.24 It is proposed that over-dimensi<strong>on</strong> category 1 and 2 agricultural motor vehicles<br />

travelling in a c<strong>on</strong>voy of three or less vehicles would not be required to have a pilot<br />

for each agricultural vehicle. This is provided there is a pilot vehicle positi<strong>on</strong>ed at the<br />

fr<strong>on</strong>t and at the rear of the c<strong>on</strong>voy.<br />

4.25 This amendment would <strong>on</strong>ly apply to areas where adequate visibility is maintained,<br />

where there is not adequate visibility <strong>on</strong> the roads a pilot vehicle would still be<br />

required for every over-sized agricultural vehicle.<br />

4.26 We agree that removing the piloting requirement altogether for oversized agricultural<br />

vehicles would raise too many c<strong>on</strong>cerns about safety.<br />

4.27 Removal of forks and other equipment fitted to the fr<strong>on</strong>t<br />

4.28 Federated Farmers supports the proposal to clarify that operators do not have to<br />

remove forks and other mounted implements fitted to the fr<strong>on</strong>t arms of agricultural<br />

vehicles.<br />

4.29 Under the External Projecti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>Rule</strong> an operator of an agricultural vehicle has to<br />

show they are following best practice and meeting the requirements set out in the<br />

<strong>Agricultural</strong> <strong>Vehicles</strong> Guide 2009. Federated Farmers believes this is a sensible<br />

safety precauti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

5. COMMENT ON ROAD USER AND VEHICLE LIGHTING AMENDMENTS<br />

5.1 Although some c<strong>on</strong>cern has been expressed to us about an ‘over saturati<strong>on</strong>’ of<br />

flashing lights, Federated Farmers supports the proposal that slow moving<br />

agricultural vehicles registered from May 2013 require to be fitted with and to use<br />

amber beac<strong>on</strong>s. We will also be encouraging farmers to use them even if their<br />

vehicles were registered before that date.<br />

5.2 The value of the beac<strong>on</strong> is when there is a large difference between speed of the<br />

vehicle and the speed of the traffic. C<strong>on</strong>cern has been expressed to us that they<br />

could be a distracti<strong>on</strong> for drivers in built up areas moving at much the same speed<br />

as the agricultural vehicle. On the other hand, the large size of agricultural vehicles<br />

and their density relative to other road users makes it important that warning is<br />

provided to motorists who do not regularly come into proximity of such large<br />

vehicles.<br />

5.3 Federated Farmers accepts that the amber flashing beac<strong>on</strong> must be visible for at<br />

least 100m. Where a towed vehicle obscures the amber flashing beac<strong>on</strong> another<br />

beac<strong>on</strong> may be fitted <strong>on</strong> to the towed vehicle.<br />

6. VEHICLE INSPECTION (AND LICENSING) REQUIREMENTS<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!