Extreme Dry Management and Planning Toolkit - Federated Farmers

COPING WITH STRESS 

ON THE FARM? 

THIS PAMPHLET CONTAINS SOME GENERAL INFORMATION 

ABOUT STRESS AND ITS MANAGEMENT. MEDICAL ADVICE 

SHOULD BE SOUGHT FROM YOUR DOCTOR. 

 

The farming community face stressors that townies 

don’t…weather doesn’t do what it needs to, the 

unpredictability of working with animals, never-ending 

farm work to be done, seasonal employment, unfair or unequal 

returns for investment and effort, too much responsibility 

and/or too much uncertainty to mention a few. It is easy to let 

it seriously get to you. 

If you or someone you know frequently feels frazzled or 

overwhelmed, you can help protect yourself and others 

from the stresses farm life throws at you by learning how to 

recognise the symptoms of stress and taking steps to reduce 

and manage it. 

WHAT IS STRESS? 

Stress is a normal physical response to changes or events that 

make you feel threatened or upset. When you sense danger 

– whether it’s real or imagined – the body’s natural defences 

automatically kick into high gear; this is known as a “fight or 

flight” reaction, or stress response. It’s the body’s way of 

protecting you from harm. 

This response helps you to stay focused, energetic, and alert, 

improving your ability to respond intuitively to a situation, for 

example, being able to slam on your brakes to avoid an accident 

or keeping you on your toes when you are kicking a gamewinning 

conversion. 

The danger lies in too much stress or stress over a long time. 

Beyond a certain point, stress stops being helpful and starts 

causing major damage to your health, your mood, your 

productivity, your relationships, and the quality of your life. 

Everyone experiences and deals with stress in different ways.

WHAT CAN CONTRIBUTE TO STRESS? 

In the rural workplace, the things that can cause stress include: 

• Weather not doing what is needed. 

• Time pressures, “too much work, too little time” (especially 

during calving, shearing, silage, cropping). 

• Financial pressures and uncertain incomes (for example, 

paying the mortgage, supporting children, buying property 

or shares, buying stock or feed, managing staff). 

• Unfair and/or unequal returns in the market. 

• Rising costs and lack of support from being geographically 

isolated (for example, education, health care, transport, 

communications, social services). 

• Relationship issues with boss, staff, neighbours, and family. 

• Long hours, shift work. 

• Having unclear roles and responsibilities, a promotion with 

more responsibility. 

• Complicated or unpleasant tasks, poor training. 

• Feeling isolated or undervalued. 

• Bullying or harassment. 

• Physical environment (for example, noise, dirt, dangers, 

poor equipment, working in bad weather, difficult animals). 

• Juggling work and home life. 

• Technology – it can be so frustrating and stressful, especially 

if it breaks down. 

WHAT ARE SOME OF THE WARNING 

SIGNS OF STRESS? 

Every person has a different reaction to stress, here are some of 

the more common warning signs that its time to manage your 

stress and consider getting help: 

• Loss of enjoyment and interest in activities usually enjoyed. 

• Loss of energy and constant tiredness. 

• Persistent worrying about little things. 

• Changes in sleeping patterns: sleeping difficulties despite 

physical exhaustion, or sometimes sleeping too much. 

• Indigestion or stomach upsets. 

• Muscle tension and pains (for example, lower back, chest, 

shoulders, joints, nervous ‘twitches’ or muscle spasms). 

• Skin itches or rashes for no apparent reason. 

• Frequent sickness (for example, cold, flu and stomach bugs). 

• Shortness of breath or shallow breathing. 

• Memory or concentration problems. 

• Doing risky or careless things (excessive drinking, gambling, 

drug use). 

• Continuous feelings of anxiousness and tension for no 

obvious reason. 

• Feeling irritable, impatient or teary with no apparent reason. 

• Finding it hard to make decisions and concentrate. 

• A sad mood that will not go away despite good things 

happening. 

• Loss of appetite or over-eating. 

• Isolation by avoiding people, places and events.

WHAT CAN YOU DO ABOUT STRESS? 

In some instances you may be able to remove the cause of 

stress. However, it is not always practical to change your 

workplace, where you live, or your relationships – but you can 

manage your body’s reaction to stress by learning new ways 

to manage or cope differently. Here are some ways to help 

manage stress: 

Talk about your worries: Spend time with someone you 

trust. Talk to a friend, partner, parents, counsellor or clergy. 

Limit your expectations: Be selective and use your energy to 

do the most important and achievable tasks. Set goals you can 

reach. Do not blame yourself if you don’t reach all your goals, 

these may be possible next time. 

Eat well: Eat a variety of fresh foods in a balanced diet. Some 

foods actually cause increased tension, for example, coffee, tea, 

chocolate, alcohol and soft drinks. These are foods we crave 

when we are stressed so be aware and try to limit your intake 

of them. 

Make time to exercise, take time out, and spend with 

family and friends: Make some time (3 times a week 

minimum) for exercise such as walking, swimming or 

something you enjoy. Give yourself a breather now and then. 

Get away from the farm for a few hours or a day. Spend time 

with family/whanau and friends or find ways of meeting new 

friends. 

Organise your work habits: Get up 5 or 10 minutes earlier 

so you don’t have to rush; break large projects down into more 

manageable smaller tasks. Spend 5 to 10 minutes at the end of 

the day preparing for the next day. This helps you gain control 

of your life. 

Solve problems: Try to find a solution to conflict; learn to be 

more assertive and say NO. 

Get sufficient sleep: To help sleep, take a walk in the evening, 

practise relaxation, make your bedroom a sleeping space only 

(remove the TV). 

Put fun and laughter in your life: This has proven to be 

good for health and it makes you feels good. 

If you or someone you know is experiencing high and 

persistent levels of stress and would like further information 

or support, talk to your doctor about how you are feeling. 

Your doctor will let you know what options are available. 

 

INFORMATION AND SUPPORT 

Other avenues for information and support include: 

Depression information www.depression.org.nz 

Depression Helpline 0800 111 757 

Like Minds Information Line 0800 102 107 

Lifeline 0800 543 354 

Victim Support 0800 842 846 

Relationship Services 0800 735 283 

Youthline 0800 376 633 

The LowDown, for youth www.thelowdown.co.nz 

Mensline 0800 636 754 

Healthline 0800 611 116 

Alcohol Drug Helpline 0800 787 797 

Gambling Helpline 0800 654 655 

Rural Women New Zealand 0800 256 467 

Federated Farmers 0800 FEDFARM 

(0800 327 646) 

If you or someone you know needs urgent help, call 111

RURAL SUPPORT TRUSTS 

Rural Support Trusts are a nationwide network which assists rural communities and individuals during and following adverse events such 

as floods and droughts. As well as this, a number of the trusts also provide their services in times of general hardship. The services that the 

trusts provide vary depending on funding and focus, but in general they offer co-ordination of an initial response to an event, help rural 

people decide business options, provide mentors or colleagues from rural backgrounds to talk to, act as advocates for financial assistance, 

advocate for assistance from Work and Income programmes (like welfare support), and provide stress management services. If the trust 

does not offer particular services themselves they will have contacts with appropriate individuals and organisations that can assist. 

Region Trusts Name Phone Contact Email 

Northland/Rodney Northland Rural Support Trust 09 430 0954 Helen Moodie helen.moodie@landcare.org.nz 

Waikato/Hauraki/ Waikato, Hauraki-Coromandel Rural 0800 787 254 Neil Bateup bateup@xtra.co.nz 

Coromandel 

Support Trust 

Bay of Plenty Bay of Plenty Rural Support Charitable 

Trust 

07 533 3764 Derek Spratt spratty@netsmart.net.nz 

East Coast East Coast Rural Support Trust 

Gisborne 06 868 4840 David Scott treescapefarm@xtra.co.nz 

Hawkes Bay 06 877 3930 Mike Barham md.ee.barham@xtra.co.nz 

Tararua 06 374 9862 Chris Southgate cwsouthgate@xtra.co.nz 

Wairarapa/ Upper Hutt 06 378 6895 Bruce Watkins hmebw@xtra.co.nz 

Taranaki Taranaki Rural Support Trust 06 757 3423 Harvey Leach taranaki@fedfarm.org.nz 

Ruapehu/Wanganui Ruapehu-Wanganui Rural Support Trust 07 893 8547 Lyn Neeson alyn@xtra.co.nz 

Manawatu/Rangitikei/ Manawatu/Rangitikei Rural Family 

06 329 6860 Margaret Millard millard@manawatu.gen.nz 

Kapiti 

Support Trust 

Marlborough/Nelson Top of the South Rural Support Trust 03 578 9923 Ian Blair ieblair@xtra.co.nz 

West Coast West Coast Rural Support Trust 027 4441 580 Ross Bishop rossbishop@xtra.co.nz 

North Canterbury North Canterbury Rural support Trust 03 318 1742 Dorothy Oakley spudfarm@xtra.co.nz 

Mid Canterbury Mid-Canterbury Emergency Relief 

03 308 7594 or Allan Baird allan.baird@xtra.co.nz 

Charitable Trust 

0274 350 141 

South Canterbury South Canterbury Rural Assistance Trust 03 612 6367 David Hewson hewson@farmside.co.nz 

Otago Otago Adverse Support Trust 03 437 1544 or 

027 6596 800 

Andrea Ludemann andrea@banarachfarm.co.nz 

Southland Southland Rural Support Trust 027 431 8173 or 

03 207 2741 

Russell Falconer russell.f@sld.quik.co.nz 

027 222 4005 Janet Gregory Janet.gregory@landcare.org.nz












Support Trust 


Trust 











Kapiti 

Support Trust 







0274 350 141 



027 6596 800 



03 207 2741 














Support Trust 


Trust 











Kapiti 

Support Trust 







0274 350 141 



027 6596 800 



03 207 2741 














Support Trust 


Trust 











Kapiti 

Support Trust 







0274 350 141 



027 6596 800 



03 207 2741 














Support Trust 


Trust 











Kapiti 

Support Trust 







0274 350 141 



027 6596 800 



03 207 2741 














Support Trust 


Trust 











Kapiti 

Support Trust 







0274 350 141 



027 6596 800 



03 207 2741 














Support Trust 


Trust 











Kapiti 

Support Trust 







0274 350 141 



027 6596 800 



03 207 2741 



FARM 

RD BRIEF 131: FARMER 

DECISION-MAKING, A TOOL 

TO AID THE PROCESS 

This R&D Brief describes the 

Multi-Criteria Decision Making 

(MCDM) process and how it 

can help farmers learn more 

about their decision-making. 

As a test of its effectiveness, 

seven Beef Focus farmers and 

their community group used 

the process and spreadsheet 

tool when considering 

changing beef policies. 

It helped show farmers what 

was important to them in 

making decisions. In the case 

 

a 50% weighting in the overall 

decision. Other issues that 

 

sustainability, market risk, 

effects on family and ease of 

management. 

RESEARCH AND 

DEVELOPMENT 

WHAT THE STUDY INVOLVED 

Through funding from Beef + Lamb New Zealand, 

AgResearch scientists took seven farmers through 

the Multi-Criteria Decision Making process. Three of 

the farmers were considering breeding cow policies 

 

hill country. 

Background information on the farm was collected 

and the policy options to consider were agreed upon. 

Then farmers were taken through the process using the 

spreadsheet tool. This took about two and a half hours 

per farmer. 

THE DECISIONMAKING PROCESS 

USING THE MCDM METHOD 

The MCDM process involved the following steps 

 

 

 

farmers in making their selection (i.e. the criteria). 

 

 

 

A mentor group helped each of the Beef Focus 

farmers to help identify possible options. These 10 to 

14 people were mostly local sheep and beef farmers, 

with two to four rural professionals included. 

 

or less and included the current system as a yardstick. 

 

 

viability of each option. 

0800 BEEFLAMB (0800 233 352) | WWW.BEEFLAMBNZ.COM 

FUNDED BY FARMER LEVIES

THE FARMS 

 

 

 

a large Mäori Trust farm. Farm size ranged from 

400 to 2800 effective hectares. 

THE DECISION 

Three farmers were considering changes 

to breeding cow policies and four were 

 

 

were – 

- Changing the sheep to cattle ratio. 

 

- Yearling heifer mating. 

- Changes to cow breed. 

HOW DO YOU WEIGH UP WHAT IS 

THE MOST IMPORTANT CRITERIA? 

Farmers made a list of the critical factors that were 

 

The farmers then weighted the relative importance of 

the criteria by comparing the criteria with each other 

i.e. giving them “swing values”. 

 

value for the Risk criteria may be half as important as 

 

 

percentage (so the weightings for all criteria added to 

100%). 

 

more important to him than impacts on family life. 

Figure A: 

for two of the farmers. 

 

with other criteria having relatively little importance. 

In contrast, Farmer 7 (F7) put similar weighting on a 

 

Farmers later had the opportunity to alter the 

weightings on their criteria. Most chose to do so. They 

found that this helped them to think through their 

evaluation of the alternatives and what really was 

important in their decision. 

HOW WELL DID THE 

ALTERNATIVES PERFORM? 

The performance of the alternatives was compared 

against each of the criteria. Gross margin was used 

 

 

The performance of the alternatives and the 

 

 

Figure B: The different options ranked according to 

criteria and their weighting. 

Note: Maximum is a hypothetical option that scores best on all criteria. 

 

came out on top. Even so, there was not a lot 

separating the seven alternatives. Although the ‘R1yr 

 

 

because of poor performance on other criteria. This 

means it is unlikely to be adopted by that farmer. 



MAKING DECISIONS? 

 

thing driving farmer decision-making. However, often 

 

to make them more money. 

 

for farmers running breeding cows. This 

technology was backed by sound research 

 

that it was apparently both a simple system, 

 

technology has been adopted by only around 

50% of farmers running breeding cows. 

 

option when all criteria were considered in nearly half 

the cases. 

 

component of decision making (as the research 

 

always control the outcomes. 

 

related issues made up less than half of the 

contribution to the performance of the top ranked 

system. In two cases, it contributed less than 20% of 

the total. 

WHAT DOES IT TELL US ABOUT 

FARMER DECISION MAKING? 

 

intuitively take a number of factors into account 

 

 

People advising farmers must recognise this and not 

 

new technologies. 

WHAT DID FARMERS THINK 

OF THE PROCESS? 

Feedback from the farmers involved was that the 

Multi-Criteria Decision Making process initially looked 

complicated but once they started it was easy to 

understand and use. Comments included - 

 

not routine daily decisions. 

 

decision and question the importance of different 

factors in my decision making. 

 

focus for discussion. 

 

working through the information. 

Although MCDM is increasingly used in Europe and 

USA, it has not been widely used in agricultural and 

environmental decision making in Australia and 

New Zealand. 

The process is recommended to farmers and people 

advising them as a useful way to help consider 

different options and to make the right decision on a 

 

 

technologies. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS & MORE INFORMATION 

 

An AGMARDT post-doctoral fellowship allowed the 

MCDM spreadsheet model to be built. 

For more information in relation to this R&D Brief see - 

 

systems on sheep and beef farms, D. C. Smeaton 

and A.E. Dooley, AgResearch, Grasslands 

Association paper. Available from Duncan Smeaton 

(see contact details below). 

For further information freephone Beef + Lamb 

New Zealand on 0800 BEEFLAMB (0800 233 352) 

or contact 

Andy Bray 

 

Liz Dooley 

AgResearch 

(07) 838 5914 liz.dooley@agresearch.co.nz 

Duncan Smeaton 

 



MAKING DECISIONS? 

 

thing driving farmer decision-making. However, often 

 

to make them more money. 

 

for farmers running breeding cows. This 

technology was backed by sound research 

 

that it was apparently both a simple system, 

 

technology has been adopted by only around 

50% of farmers running breeding cows. 

 

option when all criteria were considered in nearly half 

the cases. 

 

component of decision making (as the research 

 

always control the outcomes. 

 

related issues made up less than half of the 

contribution to the performance of the top ranked 

system. In two cases, it contributed less than 20% of 

the total. 

WHAT DOES IT TELL US ABOUT 

FARMER DECISION MAKING? 

 

intuitively take a number of factors into account 

 

 

People advising farmers must recognise this and not 

 

new technologies. 

WHAT DID FARMERS THINK 

OF THE PROCESS? 

Feedback from the farmers involved was that the 

Multi-Criteria Decision Making process initially looked 

complicated but once they started it was easy to 

understand and use. Comments included - 

 

not routine daily decisions. 

 

decision and question the importance of different 

factors in my decision making. 

 

focus for discussion. 

 

working through the information. 

Although MCDM is increasingly used in Europe and 

USA, it has not been widely used in agricultural and 

environmental decision making in Australia and 

New Zealand. 

The process is recommended to farmers and people 

advising them as a useful way to help consider 

different options and to make the right decision on a 

 

 

technologies. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS & MORE INFORMATION 

 

An AGMARDT post-doctoral fellowship allowed the 

MCDM spreadsheet model to be built. 

For more information in relation to this R&D Brief see - 

 

systems on sheep and beef farms, D. C. Smeaton 

and A.E. Dooley, AgResearch, Grasslands 

Association paper. Available from Duncan Smeaton 

(see contact details below). 

For further information freephone Beef + Lamb 

New Zealand on 0800 BEEFLAMB (0800 233 352) 

or contact 

Andy Bray 

 

Liz Dooley 

AgResearch 

(07) 838 5914 liz.dooley@agresearch.co.nz 

Duncan Smeaton 

 



Palm Kernel Facts:

Palm Kernel Facts:

Palm Kernel Facts:

Palm Kernel Facts:

Palm Kernel Facts:

Palm Kernel Facts:

Palm Kernel Facts:

Palm Kernel Facts:

Palm Kernel Facts:

Palm Kernel Facts:

Palm Kernel Facts:

FARM 

124: ILL-THRIFT identifying 

the causes and measuring 

their effects 

This R&D Brief outlines a 

project to develop better 

ways of recognising and 

testing for ill-thrift in stock. 

Using on-farm data, it 

 

between different ill-thrift 

factors e.g. endophyte 

toxicity, and animal 

performance. Knowing the 

exact relationship helps 

give farmers an indication 

whether a change of 

management is required. 

1 WHAT IS ILL-THRIFT? 

Ill-thrift is a term used to describe when stock grow at 

a slower growth rate than expected, given their feed 

 

young cattle have more than 30% slower growth rates 

than expected. 

THE AIM OF THE PROJECT WAS TO: 

a) Identify possible causes of ill-thrift. 

b) Find ways to measure the particular effect on 

growth rate e.g. amount of liveweight gain 

suppression from eating pasture with high levels of 

endophyte toxins. 

c) Develop a process whereby farmers can identify 

causes of ill-thrift. 

RESEARCH AND 

DEVELOPMENT 

TRADITIONALLY, FARMERS IDENTIFY IF THEIR FLOCK IS 

AFFECTED BY ILL-THRIFT BY: 

 

e.g. hogget weight gain in January was 25% behind 

last year. 

 

 

burden in stock. 

NEW METHODS 

The project showed that farmers can also use Beef + 

Lamb New Zealand Q-Graze software (which predicts 

liveweight gain given pasture intake and quality) to 

show that stock have ill-thrift. Actual performance (e.g. 

hoggets growing at 75g/hd/day over summer) can 

 

should be doing (e.g. 100g). 

 

 

On-farm data showed that, over summer and autumn, 

ill-thrift occurred 36% of the time in cattle and 62% of 

the time in sheep. 

Miserable or happy? Ill-thrift can be complicated to diagnose. 

 

 

The most common reason for stock growing slower 

than farmers expected over summer and autumn was 

poor pasture quality. However, when pasture quality 

was taken into consideration the next biggest cause 

of ill-thrift was parasitism - around 45% of the time in 

young sheep. 



The project monitored actual growth rates of young 

cattle mobs in the Waikato and compared them to 

Q-Graze predictions. It was shown that 36% of the 

cattle were suffering from ill-thrift. Further analysis 

indicated that 30% was due to parasites and 20% was 

linked to fusaria toxicity. Fifty percent of the causes 

were undiagnosed. 

In sheep, healthy ewe lambs were growing at 142g/ 

day but those with ill-thrift grew only 46g/day. Over 62% 

 

Of these, 45% was due to parasitism, 19% due to fusaria 

toxicity and 36% had undiagnosed causes. 

 

Ill-thrift is caused by a number of different factors 

so it is important that tests can identify a particular 

cause. The project investigated and validated tests 

 

 

deoxynivalenol (DON). Following is a summary of tests 

for diagnosing ill-thrift. 

Table A: Summary of tests 

Table A: 

Cause Test 

 

quality 

 

content and visual test for dead/ 

aged material are good methods. 

 

lamb parasite burden, less useful 

for cattle. 

 

toxin 

 

challenge requires further 

research. 

 

and not suitable for use. 

Urine test for high ergovaline levels 

validated by project. Not currently 

commercially available. 

Facial eczema 

counts, or blood GGT tests are 

very useful. 

Fusaria fungi 

measured to indicate the 

presence of other, more toxic 

fungi. These tests are available 

commercially. 

Trace elements Liver tests useful in many cases. 

 

 

at works with pleurisy is an 

indicator of pneumonia. Use 

 

 

calculate your level. 

 

 

Using the on-farm data, scientists were able to show the 

relationship between the levels of fungi, spores, larvae etc 

and liveweight gain suppression. 

The key links are - 

 

0.8 mg/kgDM, then it is likely that the toxic Trichothecenes 

will be reducing LWG by 40g/d in lambs and 0.2kg/day in 

cattle. Urine patches may have very high levels of fungi 

(200-times higher than inter-urine patches). However, this 

hypothesis requires further research. 

 

and around 70% of samples were shown to have fungi 

that produce toxins. However, the presence of toxic 

fungi does not mean that toxins are being produced, as 

was shown in further tests where fungi were present and 

growing, but no toxins could be detected. 

 

 

 

The degree of LWG suppression was not able to be 

 

 

suppressed if above 500 epg in lambs and 300 epg in 

young bulls). 

 

 

The good news is that the biggest causes of ill-thrift 

(parasitism and pasture quality) can be reduced by 

management (e.g. providing stock with higher quality 

pasture, management to reduce larval contamination of 

pastures, worm control). It is best that farmers eliminate 

 

fungi issues. 

A mentor group of vets helped guide the project. Results 

have been passed on to vets and other industry people. 

MORE INFORMATION & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

Final Report: 

Management of the factors leading to ill-thrift in young 

 

Related Beef + Lamb New Zealand resources: 

There are two R&D Briefs on trace elements, seven R&D 

Briefs on fungal toxins and eight R&D Briefs on parasites. For 

 

(0800 233 352). 

For the Wormwise information pack on managing internal 

 

Q-Graze software, phone Beef + Lamb New Zealand 

 

Ill-thrift project leader - Annette Litherland, AgResearch 

annette.litherland@agresearch.co.nz 












 



 




 

 




Table A: 

Cause Test 

 

quality 

 



 


for cattle. 

 

toxin 

 


research. 

 







very useful. 





commercially. 


 

 



 

 


 

 





 






 






 

 

 


 

 


young bulls). 

 

 






 

fungi issues. 




Final Report: 


 




 

(0800 233 352). 


 


 














 



 




 

 




Table A: 

Cause Test 

 

quality 

 



 


for cattle. 

 

toxin 

 


research. 

 







very useful. 





commercially. 


 

 



 

 


 

 





 






 






 

 

 


 

 


young bulls). 

 

 






 

fungi issues. 




Final Report: 


 




 

(0800 233 352). 


 


 














 



 




 

 




Table A: 

Cause Test 

 

quality 

 



 


for cattle. 

 

toxin 

 


research. 

 







very useful. 





commercially. 


 

 



 

 


 

 





 






 






 

 

 


 

 


young bulls). 

 

 






 

fungi issues. 




Final Report: 


 




 

(0800 233 352). 


 


 














 



 




 

 




Table A: 

Cause Test 

 

quality 

 



 


for cattle. 

 

toxin 

 


research. 

 







very useful. 





commercially. 


 

 



 

 


 

 





 






 






 

 

 


 

 


young bulls). 

 

 






 

fungi issues. 




Final Report: 


 




 

(0800 233 352). 


 


 














 



 




 

 




Table A: 

Cause Test 

 

quality 

 



 


for cattle. 

 

toxin 

 


research. 

 







very useful. 





commercially. 


 

 



 

 


 

 





 






 






 

 

 


 

 


young bulls). 

 

 






 

fungi issues. 




Final Report: 


 




 

(0800 233 352). 


 


 














 



 




 

 




Table A: 

Cause Test 

 

quality 

 



 


for cattle. 

 

toxin 

 


research. 

 







very useful. 





commercially. 


 

 



 

 


 

 





 






 






 

 

 


 

 


young bulls). 

 

 






 

fungi issues. 




Final Report: 


 




 

(0800 233 352).

Extreme Dry Management and Planning Toolkit - Federated Farmers

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?